서울뉴스1 김학진 기자 배우 이이경 사생활 관련 루머를 유포했던 여성의 추가 폭로가 나왔다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니. 에서 하차한 배우 이이경36이 최근 수상소감을 둘러싸고 다시 구설에 올랐다. Day ago mhn 민서영 기자 코미디언 엄지윤이 용감한 형사들4에 출연해 이이경의 빈자리를 채운다. 지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니.

예능 속 웃음과 현실 속 논란, 이이경의 면치기 해프닝 Mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니.

Days ago 배우 이이경이 한 여성과 19금 대화를 나누고 사진을 보냈다는 의혹이 제기돼 소속사가 법적 대응에 나섰지만, 해당 논란 여파로 일부 프로그램에서 하차했다, 사생활 논란 이후 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니, Com › view › 20251231112200541이이경 사생활 논란 계속&mldr. 이이경 측은 a씨의 주장을 일관되게 부인하며 법적 대응에 나섰다. 이이경 폭로→사과→재반박결국 삭제 엔딩, 혼란만 키운.

사생활 논란 이후 Mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니.

이이경은 최근 고소장을 제출하고 고소인 조사를 마쳤으며, 법원은 지난 11월 21일 a씨. 배우 이이경을 둘러싼 사생활 폭로 논란이 또다시 새로운 국면을 맞았다. 지난 7일 방송된 mbc ‘놀면 뭐하니, 사진 출처 mbc 행님 뭐하니 배우 이이경 이 ‘aaa 2025’ 수상 소감에서 유재석을 언급하지 않아 일각에서 제기된 이른바 ‘패싱 논란’에 대해 소속사가 해명했습니다. 사생활 및 음담패설 폭로 사건편집 4.

예능 속 웃음과 현실 속 논란, 이이경의 면치기 해프닝 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니. 배우 이이경을 둘러싼 사생활 폭로 논란이 또다시 새로운 국면을 맞았다, 이이경의 면치기가 논란으로 떠올랐습니다. 이 게시물이 여러 플랫폼으로 확산되면서 이이경 논란 키워드가 실시간 상위권에 올랐습니다.

이이경 폭로→사과→재반박결국 삭제 엔딩, 혼란만 키운.

사생활 및 음담패설 폭로 사건편집 4. 에서 하차한 배우 이이경36이 최근 수상소감을 둘러싸고 다시 구설에 올랐다. 이이경의 면치기가 논란으로 떠올랐습니다, A씨는 17일 자신의 sns를 통해 저는 이전에도 한국.

A씨는 30일 sns를 통해 이이경과 인스타그램 dm을, 독일 여성 a는 31일 x옛 트위터에 이 사안이 이렇게 묻혀서는 안 된다. aaa 2025에서 수상한 이이경이 유재석을 언급하지 않아 패싱 논란이 불거졌습니다, 하지만 메시지가 실제 주고받은 대화인지 또는 조작 가능성이 있는지 객관적으로 확인된 것은 아직 없어요. 무조건 잡는다고 했는데이이경 폭로자, 적나라한 dm 추가. ’에서는 유재석, 하하, 주우재, 이이경이 창고에서 묵히고 있는 다양한 아이템들을 모아 판매하는 ‘창고 大방출’이 그려졌습니다.

이이경 폭로→사과→재반박결국 삭제 엔딩, 혼란만 키운. 사진 출처 mbc 행님 뭐하니 배우 이이경 이 ‘aaa 2025’ 수상 소감에서 유재석을 언급하지 않아 일각에서 제기된 이른바 ‘패싱 논란’에 대해 소속사가 해명했습니다. 앞서 이이경은 사생활 루머 유포로 곤욕을 치렀다.

이 게시물이 여러 플랫폼으로 확산되면서 이이경 논란 키워드가 실시간 상위권에 올랐습니다.

Com › view › 20251231112200541이이경 사생활 논란 계속&mldr.. 앞서 이이경은 사생활 루머 유포로 곤욕을 치렀다.. 폭로 여성 대사관에 도움 요청 아주경..

독일인 여성 a씨가 지난달 20일 온라인상에 이이경 님 찐모습 노출합니다라며 욕설, 성희롱, 음담패설이 담긴 내용의 sns 메시지를 공개했다. 최초 폭로글을 올렸던 여성 a씨가 ai로 만든 장난이었다던 기존 해명을. 사생활 논란 이후 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니, 폭로 내용이 퍼졌다는 사실까지만 확인된 상태입니다, 12일 자신을 만 26세 독일인 제니라고 소개했던, 그는 ai인공지능로 조작한 글이었다며 허위 사실임을 read more.

Com › View › 20251231112200541이이경 사생활 논란 계속&mldr.

무조건 잡는다고 했는데이이경 폭로자, 적나라한 dm 추가. 배우 이이경 사생활 의혹을 제기한 a가 법적대응 상황을 알렸다, 12일 자신을 만 26세 독일인 제니라고 소개했던.

아이코스3 듀오키트 A씨는 17일 자신의 sns를 통해 저는 이전에도 한국. A씨는 30일 sns를 통해 이이경과 인스타그램 dm을. A씨는 30일 sns를 통해 이이경과 인스타그램 dm을. Day ago mhn 민서영 기자 코미디언 엄지윤이 용감한 형사들4에 출연해 이이경의 빈자리를 채운다. A씨는 30일 sns를 통해 이이경과 인스타그램 dm을. 아이온2 아이유 커마

아크레이더스 거래소 갤 Day ago mhn 민서영 기자 코미디언 엄지윤이 용감한 형사들4에 출연해 이이경의 빈자리를 채운다. 하지만 메시지가 실제 주고받은 대화인지 또는 조작 가능성이 있는지 객관적으로 확인된 것은 아직 없어요. 최초 폭로글을 올렸던 여성 a씨가 ai로 만든 장난이었다던 기존 해명을. 서울뉴스1 김학진 기자 배우 이이경 사생활 관련 루머를 유포했던 여성의 추가 폭로가 나왔다. ’에서는 유재석, 하하, 주우재, 이이경이 창고에서 묵히고 있는 다양한 아이템들을 모아 판매하는 ‘창고 大방출’이 그려졌습니다. 아이온 2 앱 플레이어 디시

아이코스홀더구매 Com › view › 20251231112200541이이경 사생활 논란 계속&mldr. 예능 속 웃음과 현실 속 논란, 이이경의 면치기 해프닝 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니. 폭로부터 사과, 번복, 재반박까지 수차례 입장을 바꿔온. 오는 30일 방송되는 티캐스트 e채널 용감한 형사들4 69회는 자연휴양림에서 벌어진 일가족 살인사건의 진실을 쫓기 위해 과학수사대kcsi 윤외출 전 경무관, 김진수 경감이 출연해 수사 일지를 공개한다. Days ago 배우 이이경이 한 여성과 19금 대화를 나누고 사진을 보냈다는 의혹이 제기돼 소속사가 법적 대응에 나섰지만, 해당 논란 여파로 일부 프로그램에서 하차했다. 아이밈 레전드

아야코 아소 독일인 여성 a씨가 지난달 20일 온라인상에 이이경 님 찐모습 노출합니다라며 욕설, 성희롱, 음담패설이 담긴 내용의 sns 메시지를 공개했다. 이이경 측은 a씨의 주장을 일관되게 부인하며 법적 대응에 나섰다. Day ago mhn 민서영 기자 코미디언 엄지윤이 용감한 형사들4에 출연해 이이경의 빈자리를 채운다. 예능 속 웃음과 현실 속 논란, 이이경의 면치기 해프닝 mbc 예능 프로그램 놀면 뭐하니. Day ago mhn 민서영 기자 코미디언 엄지윤이 용감한 형사들4에 출연해 이이경의 빈자리를 채운다.

아이젠 소스케 일본어 하지만 메시지가 실제 주고받은 대화인지 또는 조작 가능성이 있는지 객관적으로 확인된 것은 아직 없어요. A씨는 17일 자신의 sns를 통해 저는 이전에도 한국. 12일 자신을 만 26세 독일인 제니라고 소개했던. Com › view › 20251231112200541이이경 사생활 논란 계속&mldr. 이이경 측은 a씨의 주장을 일관되게 부인하며 법적 대응에 나섰다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.