물론 손흥민, 김민재, 이강인 등 유럽 빅리그에서 활약하는 축구 해외파들의 화제성은 국내 야구 스타들 이상이다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이강인은 4일 한국시간 미국 뉴욕 아이칸 스타디움에서 실시된 축구 대표팀 훈련에 참여하지 않고 실내에서 회복 운동을 진행했다. Net › square › 3740833737더쿠 손흥민 이강인 탁구 사건 전말. 2022 fifa 월드컵 카타르 포르투갈전이 끝나고 기쁨을 주체 못해 이강인에게 볼 뽀뽀를 했는데 sns에서 폭발적인 반응을 불러왔다. 이강인 결장 psg, 오세르 10 꺾고 프랑스 리그1 5연승.

Net › Square › 3741890998더쿠 리그 우승 행사에 가족들+여친과 이강인.

국가대표 이강인 23파리 생제르맹 Fc이 두산家 5세와 사랑에 빠졌다.

잡담 조영욱 인스타에 이강인 기성용 ㅠㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 977 7 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

Kr › community › listview이강인 관련 이슈, 커뮤니티 베스트 모아보기 1일 이슈링크. 이강인 결장 psg, 오세르 10 꺾고 프랑스 리그1 5연승. 축구 국가대표 이강인의 소속팀 파리생제르맹psg이 fc바르셀로나스페인 출신의 18세 유망주 드로 페르난데스를 영입했다. 2018 아시안 게임 김학범호 에 뽑히길 기대한 축구 팬들이 많았으나, 결국 승선하지 못했다. Jpg 103,229 838 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

Net › square › 3106530810더쿠 단독 그러자, 주먹을 휘둘렀다&mldr.. Days ago 케이돌토크 잡담 손흥민 김민재 이강인 이재성 데리고 있으면 챗gpt로 전술짜도 지금 홍보단 나을듯 38 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo..

축구선수 이강인의 최신 소식, 경기 일정, 선수 통계와 하이라이트, 팬미팅 정보 등을 공유하며, 인터뷰와 경기 리뷰, 팬 토론에 대해 다루는 팬카페 사이트입니다. 무명의 더쿠 20250813 104825 진짜 반갑고 좋다 강인아ㅠㅠ보고싶었다ㅠ, 이강인 더쿠, 여시 눈팅했는데 다들 언팔완료, 국가대표 이강인 23파리 생제르맹 fc이 두산家 5세와 사랑에 빠졌다.

prettyyounggainer Net › leekangin더쿠 이강인. 우리를 처음부터 마지막까지 믿어주신 감독님과 코칭스태프에게 감사하다. 잡담 근데 이강인 왜갑자기 19번으로 바꾼거지 여태까지도 19번 계속 돌고도는 번호였는데. Kr › community › listview이강인 관련 이슈, 커뮤니티 베스트 모아보기 1일 이슈링크. Days ago 이슈 이강인 여친이랑 psg선수 여친들 모임 10,087 34 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. rance hitomi

pingo ai 디시 이강인 소속 psg, 바르사 출신 18세 유망주 페르난데스 영입. Psg는 미드필더를 우선순위로 고려하지 않고. Com › 6430863693이강인 더쿠, 여시 눈팅했는데 다들 언팔완료. 파리 프리시즌 경기 하나도 없었어서 못 맞춰봐서 그런지 다들 헤맸는데 진짜 이강인 들어오자마자 확 바뀜ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 이강인하무스 너무 좋았음 피케이도 개깔끔. 이강인의 연인은 박상효 25로, 재벌그룹의 로열 패밀리다. pornhub.comp

ratty bot only 대표팀 관계자에 따르면 이강인은 전날 훈련. 삭제일시 20250605 014623. Com › 6430863693이강인 더쿠, 여시 눈팅했는데 다들 언팔완료. 사회가 너무 파편화 되서 결혼해서 애낳고 사는게 dna에 각인되어 있는 사람들이 꼴에 비혼한다고 본능거부하고 미디어의 우상에 그 모성애를 투여하니 read more. Kr › community › listview이강인 관련 이슈, 커뮤니티 베스트 모아보기 1일 이슈링크. pikpak りょ

rattybot 라이키 야동 무명의 더쿠 20250813 104825 진짜 반갑고 좋다 강인아ㅠㅠ보고싶었다ㅠ. 탈세 200억 차은우 엄마 장어집 어제연숯불장어강화 회사 의혹. Days ago 황인범 선수와 최적의 조합 추천해줘 4명 추천해줌 황인범 선수는 창의적인 패스와 경기 조율 능력이 뛰어나지만, 상대적으로 피지컬 경합이나 전문적인 수비 커버에서 약점이 있을 수 있습니다. Jpg 103,229 838 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 이강인 인스타 업 102,818 1366 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

pikpak ranking Com › 6430863693이강인 더쿠, 여시 눈팅했는데 다들 언팔완료. 영국 더선은 6일 한국시각 아스널이 psg의 미드필더 이강인 영입을 다시 고려하고 있다고 보도했다. 미켈 아르테타 아스널 감독은 지난 1월에도 이강인에게 관심을 보였다. Days ago 케이돌토크 잡담 손흥민 김민재 이강인 이재성 데리고 있으면 챗gpt로 전술짜도 지금 홍보단 나을듯 38 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. ⠀ 지난 아시안컵 대회에서, 저의 짧은 생각과 경솔한 행동으로 인해 흥민이 형을 비롯한 팀 전체와 축구 팬 여러분께 큰 실망을 끼쳐드렸습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.