Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

인계 의 준정령들 데이트 어 라이브 프래그먼트 데이트 어. 모종의 사건으로 인해 새로운 세계에 발을 들이게 된다. 받아놓고 안하다 보여서 할랬는데 ai쓴거같은데 태그에 없네 흠. 5k views streamed 2 years ago.

Pcolle Missav

Park Bo Young Fake Nude

음문의 정령기사 이겜이거 somisoft.. 5 95 세상에 꼴리는 게임은 많은데3 빠삐놈 25..

Nozomi Ishihara Twitter

우선일반 유저이고 폰으로만 한다는걸 알아주시면 좋겠습니다어제 오전 용던 사냥중 대정령이 몇번 치다가고를 하더군요2년만에 다시하는거라 먼지 몰라서 장난으로 강제타겟팅을 해서 때려봄이 때문일 수도 있을까요. Cursed blessing 음문의 정령기사 1, 16 dkdkckfrh 20250718 040249 조회 2170 좋아요 1. E교환권은 적립 일로부터 180일 동안 사용.

01로 작업한거라 버젼 안맞으면 적용 안될수있으니 주의하고 게임 안해보고 식질한거라 좀 어색하거나 이상한부분 있을수있음. 설정 편집 원소정령계 라는 특수한 장소에서 살고 있으며 인간계 에 나타나서 소녀 들과 계약을 하며 힘을 빌려준다. 그는 어느날 갑자기 전생의 기억을 떠올리게 되고, 그와 동시에 자신이 강대한 마력을 가지고 있음을 깨닫게 된다.

95 미번 cursed blessing 음문의 정령 기사 ver, 설정 편집 원소정령계 라는 특수한 장소에서 살고 있으며 인간계 에 나타나서 소녀 들과 계약을 하며 힘을 빌려준다. 5 95 세상에 꼴리는 게임은 많은데3 빠삐놈 25.

※ 본 기사는 아리엘 서버, 아발론 레기온의 철기둥, 체이스필드, 패왕족의 제보로 작성되었습니다. 16 dkdkckfrh 20250718 040249 조회 2170 좋아요 1. 30 전체 미번 cursed blessing 음문의 정령 기사 ver. 정령성이 정령을 10마리를 데리고 다닌다.

드라마 시작은 선문 세가 자제들이 고소 남씨남망기네 집에 공부를 배우러 가는 장면인데, 여기서 망기와 위영이 처음 만난다. Baca komik cursed blessing sekarang. 물의 정령은 2023년과 2024년 영국 로열 오페라 프로덕션의 노르마와 오텔로를 수입해 무대에 올렸던 예술의전당이 이탈리아의 라 스칼라, 영국의. 그러니까 결론은, 잠재력이 있으면 사람들은 정령술사도 되고 마법사도 될 수 있다는 거지, 해당 번역판은 음문의 사자 기사 본편과 14탄을 포함하고 있습니다.

picazor evawxsh 인계 의 준정령들 데이트 어 라이브 프래그먼트 데이트 어. 오타 및 번역이 되지 않은 부분이 있을 수 있습니다. 3500여개가 넘는 가규 read more. 작중 등장한 정령은 전부 여성으로, 본편에 등장하는 세피라 정령들뿐만 아니라 외전에서 등장하는 린네와 같은 유사정령들도 전부 여성으로 그려진다. 5악장 숲의정령은 다이어리를 체크하지 않으면 깨기가 많이 어렵습니다. ntr헨타이

nirumayu 토론 스바루의 정령 친화력과 음의 친화력은 얼마나 강할까. 송유성 프로필 국적 대한민국 출생 1985년 2월 21일 학력 위스콘신대학교 메디슨캠퍼스 광고학 데뷔 2000년 판타지 소설 정령기사. 드라마 시작은 선문 세가 자제들이 고소 남씨남망기네 집에 공부를 배우러 가는 장면인데, 여기서 망기와 위영이 처음 만난다. 16 dkdkckfrh 20250718 040249 조회 2170 좋아요 1. 5k views streamed 2 years ago. onlyfans b32347664

onarapedia 정령성이 정령을 10마리를 데리고 다닌다. Hai, wanita rendahan. 여행자가 「속세의 주전자」를 사용 및 소환하면, 「속세의 주전자」와의 상호 작용을 통해 주전자 안으로 들어갈 수 있습니다. 5k views streamed 2 years ago. 하늘을 떠다니는 공중대륙, 도시, 비행선, 오염된 지상의 마대륙, 이방인을 두려워하고 혐오하는 폐쇄된 신대륙, 목숨을 위. nhdtc-101

patreon jena korea 음문의 정령기사 이겜이거 somisoft. 음흉하고 한결같은 깡촌 read more. 그는 어느날 갑자기 전생의 기억을 떠올리게 되고, 그와 동시에 자신이 강대한 마력을 가지고 있음을 깨닫게 된다. 송유성 프로필 국적 대한민국 출생 1985년 2월 21일 학력 위스콘신대학교 메디슨캠퍼스 광고학 데뷔 2000년 판타지 소설 정령기사. 5악장 숲의정령은 다이어리를 체크하지 않으면 깨기가 많이 어렵습니다.

pding 이안 그런데 재밌는 시스템이 아니라 오락실 내에서 그냥저냥 하는 게임정도. 미번번역요청 hechima koubou 優等生・調教孕ませレ〇プ〜アパートの一室で犯され続けた女子生徒の記録〜. 01로 작업한거라 버젼 안맞으면 적용 안될수있으니 주의하고 게임 안해보고 식질한거라 좀 어색하거나 이상한부분 있을수있음. 5악장 숲의정령은 다이어리를 체크하지 않으면 깨기가 많이 어렵습니다. 송유성 프로필 국적 대한민국 출생 1985년 2월 21일 학력 위스콘신대학교 메디슨캠퍼스 광고학 데뷔 2000년 판타지 소설 정령기사.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.