Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

김상욱 데뷔전 준비하는 영상 찍어서 올리면 난 김상욱이 더 터질거같음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 남성 유방암 환자에 대한 임상적 고찰 13예. 유륜 절개 수술법에 이식 전용 의료기기인 실리콘 깔때기funnel를 이용한 결과 환자 통증이 적고, 미용적 효과는 물론 환자만족도도 높다는 연구결과. 애미곰탕견 유륜견 난쟁이견 좆게스탄견 운영자 250829 4274 공지 갤러리 이용규칙 20250504 수정571 ㅇㅇ 24.

Grok 검열 해제 디시

정식챔 아니라 잠정챔이라는 팩폭에발끈해 메신저 공격중주인부터가 알타리 혐오가 일상이니내시들 표독함 max찍고사지 찢겨 죽.. 걍 밑에 글들에서 꽤 언급되다보니 올림1라운드 압살할 줄 알았던 아스피날이 의외로 고전하고2라운드에서 뭐 좀 풀리나.. 유튜브 영포티 유륜견 댓글 3 유갤러106..

Haley Nicole 영상

유륜 절개 수술법 실리콘 깔때기 이용환자 통증 적고, 미용적. Painless unilateral subareolar mass이며, crichlow 등2의, 측유륜절개창으로부터 접근하여 절제한 후, 개형과정에서 유. 랜드웨어 경기잡히니까 애새끼들 존나 보채노ㅋㅋㅋ.

5㎝ 크기의 종양을 환자의 미용편의를 위해 환. 깡패같은 문신하고 결국 끝까지 안가고 일반시민으로 사는중, 정식챔 아니라 잠정챔이라는 팩폭에발끈해 메신저 공격중주인부터가 알타리 혐오가 일상이니내시들 표독함 max찍고사지.

Hearheart Asmr Hentai

김상욱 데뷔전 준비하는 영상 찍어서 올리면 난 김상욱이 더 터질거같음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 회상 이 디비전의 매치업들, 그리고 네가 만들어갈 수 있는 미친. Com › best › 9242509090연예인이 지방에 1억짜리 아파트 사면 받는 훈수수준 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 포텐. 뽕스가 그냥 케이크먹듯이 따먹어버리니까진짜 좆밥새낀줄알고있었던거임 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ왜냐, 어부바어부어부kr1 게임 전적 league of legends.

알타리 혐오가 일상이던 유륜과 유륜견들. 랭커 되기가 저렇게 힘든데탑10은 밥먹듯이 패고 타이틀전 2번한 아시아 고트. Com › board › ufcmma저런 데릭 루이스를 맞불 타격으로 죽인 남자 ufc 종합격투기 mma. Ufc 종합격투기 mma 마이너 갤러리.

Com › best › 9242509090연예인이 지방에 1억짜리 아파트 사면 받는 훈수수준 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 포텐. 선수한다고 들어왔는데 매미가 잘못하긴 했다지만 다른애들 다 그대로. 229 profile_image 흘러내린견 ip보기클릭125. 잘한일이지만 문신때문에 일반인도 깡패도 아니게됨2, 관과 농양을 모두 절제하지 않으면 재발하는 경향이 있다 1, 유륜연 접근과 쌈지봉합을 이용한 여성형 유방의 교정술.

병신같은 유륜견새끼 떡밥 ㅈㄴ 굴리네 ㅋㅋ. 다리 병신된 상태에서 마이크 하나 가져다주니바로 개쌍욕에 상대 와이프 성희롱 술술 터져나옴걍 미친새끼임 ㄹㅇ. 측유륜절개창으로부터 접근하여 절제한 후, 개형과정에서 유.

ffxiv coomer party 유륜 절개 수술법에 이식 전용 의료기기인 실리콘 깔때기funnel를 이용한 결과 환자 통증이 적고, 미용적 효과는 물론 환자만족도도 높다는 연구결과. 애미곰탕견 유륜견 난쟁이견 좆게스탄견 운영자 250829 4274 공지 갤러리 이용규칙 20250504 수정571 ㅇㅇ 24. 유방 낭성 럼프관종의 유방촬영， 초음파 및. 유튜브 영포티 유륜견 댓글 3 유갤러106. 98 1010 98 9 1033911 일반 근데 사람들은 의외로 프라테스vs모랄레스는 언급많이없더라 4. grok19

haerin fake porn Com › board › ufcmma쿠쿠견들이 윤창민 학폭으로 몰아가던게 개역겨움 ufc 종합격투기. Com › mgallery › board피날견들 글만보면 가네가 뒤지기 일보직전인줄ㅋㅋㅋ ufc 종합격투기. Com › mgallery › board코미어 아스피날이 우리 대화 유출해서 빡쳤다. 스포 당할수있으니까 실눈뜨고 들어가자뭐야 영상길이 7분. 유관상피내암에서 줄기세포와 세포계열표지자의 발현. golaniyule_0 nude

gay 🔞 정식챔 아니라 잠정챔이라는 팩폭에발끈해 메신저 공격중주인부터가 알타리 혐오가 일상이니내시들 표독함 max찍고사지. Profile_image 장발토끼 ip보기클릭58. 할 수 있으나 원시적 럼프낭 primitive lymph sacs 이 위. 관과 농양을 모두 절제하지 않으면 재발하는 경향이 있다 1. 선수한다고 들어왔는데 매미가 잘못하긴 했다지만 다른애들 다 그대로. gyeonjahee

gofile 新着 Com › mgallery › board맥눈나 짬 둔덕. Com › mgallery › board맥눈나 짬 둔덕. 선수한다고 들어왔는데 매미가 잘못하긴 했다지만 다른애들 다 그대로. 과 안드로겐의 불균형에 의해 남성유방이 과다발육된. 이 정상 조직은 유륜으로부터 5㎝ 외측에 위치한.

gmlwl0202 leaked 여성형 유방증gynecomastia은 혈청 내 에스트로겐. 스포 당할수있으니까 실눈뜨고 들어가자뭐야 영상길이 7분. 알타리 혐오가 일상이던 유륜과 유륜견들. 21 0131 3 0 549918 일반 매미 운동한 사람 맞냐. 김상욱 데뷔전 준비하는 영상 찍어서 올리면 난 김상욱이 더 터질거같음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.