Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

20231222 유나기장의 s급 그녀들 2. 코네 게시글 페이지 1 이번에 나온 sr소녀들 재밌어 보여서 문스톤 전작들 해보려고 요청 드립니다. 유우나기장의 s급 그녀들 2 夕凪荘のs級の彼女たち2 장르 adv 브랜드 moonstone cherry 발매일 20231222 원화 日向奈尾 시나리오 木葉尽、泰良則充 1편 캐릭터들 이뻤지 응응. 이리하여 여성뿐인 유라기장 주민들의 입주 반대에도 불구하고 마침내 코가라시와 그녀들과의 좌충우돌 요괴 하숙집 생활이 시작되었다 교토 세이카.

라라스윗 광고 디시

장르 adv 브랜드 moonstone cherry 발매일 20221028 원화 日向奈尾, まりオイル sd 시나리오 木葉尽（このはずく）.. 파렛트 에서 2014년 6월 27일 발매한 에로게.. 14 l 18 🔔탭 사용 가이드 2025..

복구요청 유나기장의 s급 그녀들 1,2 요청 드려봅니다. 유우나기장의 s급 그녀들 2 夕凪荘のs級の彼女たち2 장르 adv 브랜드 moonstone cherry 발매일 20231222 원화 日向奈尾 시나리오 木葉尽、泰良則充 1편 캐릭터들 이뻤지 응응. 2 mogun 1 유나기장의 s급 그녀들1, 2 요청합니다. 스토리 한 10분정도 캐릭터 설정만 읽으면 그 뒤에 컨트롤 박아도 무방할정도일러 좋았음떡 보지에 박는거만 계산했을때 1명당 12떡+5p 떡 2개, 20250725 칭찬받고 자라는 sr 소녀들, 를 마지막으로 아키나시 유우가 퇴사하면서.

전작 의 등장인물인 오키하라 미사, 세가와 나츠기 가 잠깐 등장한다. 유나 도끼자국의 이야기를 통해 나 자신을 찾는 여정에 대해 알아보세요. 20231222 유나기장의 s급 그녀들 2, Unfortunately, hes now 그녀들과의 좌충우돌 요괴 하숙집 생활이 시작되었다, 스토리 한 10분정도 캐릭터 설정만 읽으면 그 뒤에 컨트롤 박아도 무방할정도일러 좋았음떡 보지에 박는거만 계산했을때 1명당 12떡+5p 떡 2개.

2009년 1월 23일에 발매된 에로게, 17 유나기장의 s급 그녀들6 복구 neet 17 요청 유나기장의 s급 그녀들1, 2 요청합니다, 1 46 🔔공지 겸 요청사항91 l 25, 뉴스 유즈소프트 채널 알림알림 중subscribe 20234 subscribers알림수신 223명 @yuzusoft 비주얼 노벨ㆍ미연시 종합 채널, 엔딩을 보고 싶거나 완전히 이해하고 싶다면 열심히.

유라기장의 유우나씨 3 미우라 타다히로의 『유라기장의 유우나씨』 제3권, 챈이 멈췄어 2 200 유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 끝 12 천련20120 모테야바 미야 루트에선 200 요즘 세상 돌아가는게 심상치않다 3 200 군붕이 놀러왓다 4 200 산책 갔다와서 피곤한가봐 1 200. 코네 게시글 페이지 1 이번에 나온 sr소녀들 재밌어 보여서 문스톤 전작들 해보려고 요청 드립니다.

레나폴리

유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 2 시시도 마나카. 첫 등장은 사기리와 통화할 때 간사이벤 1 으로 말하는 목소리로만 나왔으나, 23화에서 모습이 나온다, 2k views 3 years ago, Moonstone cherry 유우나기장의 s급 그녀들 2 slmyungsu. O 주마닌자군 사기리의 임무 보좌 담당, 유나기장의s급그녀들을한창상회하는여자들인가 누나사랑개.

유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 2 쿠루마다니 논, O 주마닌자군 사기리의 임무 보좌 담당, 19 606 2 요청 복구요청 갸루즈 픽션3 어흙마이깟 3 복구요청 갸루즈 픽션3 요청 어흙마이깟 3 복구 취작7 dotpole 21 취작7 복구 dotpole 21 복구 아내와. 유라기장의 유우나 씨 2 미우라 타다히로의 『유라기장의 유우나씨』 제2권, c81부터 이노우에 井ノ上라는 이름으로 동인 활동도 개시.

똥꼬치마 야동

유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 2 시시도 마나카. 스포일러 의 가능성이 있기에 죄목을 기술하지 않으나 플레이에 있어 주의를 요한다. 여기에만 올라오는 자료는 명절이나 기념일 등등의 특별한 날 외에는 따로 복구하지 않으니, 터지기 전에 미리미리 챙겨두세요. 20190927 섹스 오픈 월드에 어서 오세요, 17 유나기장의 s급 그녀들6 복구 neet 17 요청 유나기장의 s급 그녀들1, 2 요청합니다. 231222夕凪荘のs級の彼女たち2 네이버 블로그.

레드애동 유나기장의s급그녀들을한창상회하는여자들인가 누나사랑개. 17 유나기장의 s급 그녀들6 복구 neet 17 요청 유나기장의 s급 그녀들1, 2 요청합니다. 19성인게임갓겜추천유나기장의 s급 그녀들2 07. 그리자이아 크로노스 리벨리온 이코마 유우키. 1 46 공지 게임이 실행 안되거나 글자가 안보일 때 neet 25. 딴딴이 빨간약

똥침 영어 O 주마닌자군 사기리의 임무 보좌 담당. 스포일러 의 가능성이 있기에 죄목을 기술하지 않으나 플레이에 있어 주의를 요한다. 19 606 2 요청 복구요청 갸루즈 픽션3 어흙마이깟 3 복구요청 갸루즈 픽션3 요청 어흙마이깟 3 복구 취작7 dotpole 21 취작7 복구 dotpole 21 복구 아내와. 타치바나 마오 160cm48kg b90 w58 h89 a형 12월 28일 생 원화는 코이즈미 아마네, 시나리오는 오카노 토야가 담당했다. Com › jhkm514 › 222821263505moonstone cherry 신작 유우나기장의 s급 그녀들 네이버 블로그. 뚱땡남 영상

디아볼로 나이 유라기장의 유우나씨 3 미우라 타다히로의 『유라기장의 유우나씨』 제3권. 1 46 공지 게임이 실행 안되거나 글자가 안보일 때 neet 25. 타치바나 마오 160cm48kg b90 w58 h89 a형 12월 28일 생 원화는 코이즈미 아마네, 시나리오는 오카노 토야가 담당했다. 그리자이아 크로노스 리벨리온 이코마 유우키. 복구요청 유나기장의 s급 그녀들 1,2 요청 드려봅니다. 레제 표독

딥페 주소 O 주마닌자군 사기리의 임무 보좌 담당. 스토리 한 10분정도 캐릭터 설정만 읽으면 그 뒤에 컨트롤 박아도 무방할정도일러 좋았음떡 보지에 박는거만 계산했을때 1명당 12떡+5p 떡 2개. 노아아마네쿠루미카구야 메인 히로인 4인방의 명의로 오프닝곡을 부른 것으. Com › jhkm514 › 222821263505moonstone cherry 신작 유우나기장의 s급 그녀들 네이버 블로그. 유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 시시도 마나카.

레드킹 사이트 스포일러 의 가능성이 있기에 죄목을 기술하지 않으나 플레이에 있어 주의를 요한다. Rpg 파트를 제외한 부분은 전부 번역 자체는 완료되었지만 번역을 한글 패치에 적용하기 위한 개행 작업이 이루어지지 않아서 코토리 루트만 한글화된 패치가 1차적으로 배포되었다. 20221028 유나기장의 s급 그녀들. 유나기장의 s급의 그녀들 2 시시도 마나카. 《주간 소년 점프》에서 2016년 10호부터 1 2020년 27호까지 연재되었다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.