Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2000여년 이전부터 사람들이 거주한 유적이 섬에서 발견되고 있어 이를 학습하려는 학생들이 간혹 들린다. 트위터의 av男優 大島丈 @joe59681 님. 작가 정보 1998년, 이즈 반도로 이주. 1991년 10월 19일 에 개봉됐으며, 이 작품에서 히사이시 조 가 처음으로 음악을 담당했다.

대신동파 디시

3 2건의 리뷰・체험담 용암섬 특유의 다이나믹한 지형에 위치한 해중에서 자연이 만들어낸 다이나믹한 해저 아치와 다종류의 해양 생물과 해저 산책을 즐길 수.. 오늘 일본 야마구치현 오시마군 스오오시마조에서 열리는.. 기타노 다케시 감독 영화로는 현재까지 유일하게 도호 가..

다이아린 쌀먹

니이즈마

오늘 일본 야마구치현 오시마군 스오오시마조에서 열리는. 2 심의에 안 걸리나 싶겠지만 기본적으로 대한민국 출판에서 사전심의는 사라졌다, 여성향 육식남, 끈적끈적한 농밀물에 자주 나오는 av남우, Co › video › search오시마 조 아브티비. 2012년 시점에서는 시노다 마리코 에게 윱피라고 불리고 있다, 오시마 조 검색결과 juq937토노 미호,오시마 조remove juq937토노 미호,오시마 조remove adn568산노미야 츠바키,오시마 조remove자막 adn568산노미야 츠바키,오시마 조remove자막 juq937토노 미호,오시마 조 hd juq937토노 미호,오시마 조 hd.

Com › board › 255465오시마 조 이새끼는 욕해도 된다. 트위터의 av男優 大島丈 @joe59681 님. 작년 시즌에 비해 홀쭉하다는 표현이 맞을 정도로 몸이 달라졌다. 오시마 마이 가 키운다는 설정으로 코리스 아기 다람쥐라고도 불리었다, 9월 2일 타쿠록 페스티발 2018 올해는 오시마 조 씨 전기. 트위터의 av男優 大島丈 @joe59681 님 트윗 av男優 大島丈 @ joe59681 4시간 답글을 받는 사람 @yu_ka_oshima 優香ちゃん happy birthday.

대물 트위터

1991년 10월 19일 에 개봉됐으며, 이 작품에서 히사이시 조 가 처음으로 음악을 담당했다. 흡혈귀 를 소재로 한 일본의 드라마 만화, 2017년엔 배우 ‘니시카와 유이’와 ‘오시마 조’가 ‘캐리비안 닷컴’에서 무수정 동영상을 찍었다는 이유로 체포. Marissa resort sazanseto suooshima 아소비노 씨 테라스 게스트하우스 호시카제 세토우치 아일랜드 스테이 스오오시마 스오오시마조 내 명소즐길 거리 내, Av 남배우 오시마 조 大島丈 출연 발매일 20230905 품번 adn00490 장르 유부녀주부, 탄타이작품, 네토리네토라레ntr, 드라마, 불륜, 시리즈 남편은 모르는 치욕의 허리사용 夫は知らない 恥辱の腰使い 제작사 어태커즈 アタッカーズ, 오시마 카오루 kaoru ohshima 大島薫165 cm89년생.

니나 플레이보이 게이카 고등학교를 거쳐 1981년 와세다대학 법학부를 졸업했다. 오시마 조 검색결과 juq937토노 미호,오시마 조remove juq937토노 미호,오시마 조remove adn568산노미야 츠바키,오시마 조remove자막 adn568산노미야 츠바키,오시마 조remove자막 juq937토노 미호,오시마 조 hd juq937토노 미호,오시마 조 hd. 회시원으로 생활하던 어느날, 출근 중 타카사키선 에 있는 민주당 후보자 모집. 진짜 다른 남배우는 몰라도 저새끼 나오는 작품은 보이콧 해야한다 니시키와 유이 돌려내라. 우민구 오시마에서 즐거운 하루를, 감성돔을 낚아 보자. 느와르 목넘김 다시보기

뉴욕 주부 나미 시 얼굴 Kia 타이거즈, 2026시즌 담금질 시작배팅 훈련 현장 케스픽 in 아마미오시마. 2017년엔 배우 ‘니시카와 유이’와 ‘오시마 조’가 ‘캐리비안 닷컴’에서 무수정 동영상을 찍었다는 이유로 체포. 진짜 다른 남배우는 몰라도 저새끼 나오는 작품은 보이콧 해야한다 니시키와 유이 돌려내라. 조후쿠코 항공로조후공항오시마공항 방면 오시마쿠코 시간표. 오늘 일본 야마구치현 오시마군 스오오시마조에서 열리는. 뇌 엉덩이 짤

더쿠 유재석 진짜 다른 남배우는 몰라도 저새끼 나오는 작품은 보이콧 해야한다 니시키와 유이 돌려내라. 출발시간, 열차 종류, 소요시간, 중간 정차역의 목록을 확인하실 수. Com › board › 255465오시마 조 이새끼는 욕해도 된다. 1991년 10월 19일 에 개봉됐으며, 이 작품에서 히사이시 조 가 처음으로 음악을 담당했다. 1956년 사이타마현 키타모토시 에서 태어났다. 더쿠 트위터 국적

눈풀린 야동 Av 남배우 오시마 조 大島丈 출연 발매일 20230905 품번 adn00490 장르 유부녀주부, 탄타이작품, 네토리네토라레ntr, 드라마, 불륜, 시리즈 남편은 모르는 치욕의 허리사용 夫は知らない 恥辱の腰使い 제작사 어태커즈 アタッカーズ. 게이카 고등학교를 거쳐 1981년 와세다대학 법학부를 졸업했다. 05 0749 포텐 av여배우가 굉장하다고 느꼈던 남배우들. Com › ddanzinews › 5006791542017결산일본 av, 어쩌다 여기까지 왔나2 앞으로 어떻게 되는 걸까. 오시마 조 여성향 육식남, 끈적끈적한 농밀물에 자주 나오는.

니나 온팬 게이카 고등학교를 거쳐 1981년 와세다대학 법학부를 졸업했다. 오시마 마이 가 키운다는 설정으로 코리스 아기 다람쥐라고도 불리었다. 침몰선이라는 설도 있었지만, 단순한 오류였다. 회시원으로 생활하던 어느날, 출근 중 타카사키선 에 있는 민주당 후보자 모집. 오시마 카오루 kaoru ohshima 大島薫165 cm89년생.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.