Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

싼 가격의 상품을 놓고 경쟁이 치열한 지금 에이카화이트aeca white의 행보는 독특합니다. 음모가 역병이 되어 퍼졌다 2019년 최대 기대작으로 손꼽히는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 은 죽었던 왕이 되살아나자 반역자로 몰린 왕세자가 향한 조선의 끝, 그곳에서 굶주림 끝에 괴물이 되어버린 이들의 비밀을. 색상이나 디자인도 여러개가 있고 구매 후기도 많은 브랜드입니다. Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers.

아이코스3리셋

Jessup 2024 – the case concerning the sterren forty the jessup 2024 problem concerned traitors and crooks, and raises issues related to the right to political expression, statelessness, the r.. Access blocking country info..

에이카화이트 aeca white 에이카화이트는 심플하면서도 본질적인 삶을 추구하는 사람을 위한 브랜드입니다. Experience realtime purchase of rare kpop merch and korean preloved items on bunjang global site. 우리는 연령과 성별, 시대를 구분하지 않으며 규정된 라이프 스타일을 지양합니다, 급식들은 해외브랜드인 줄 알고 있는게 포인트, Its not possible to access the online shopping mall from your country. 에이카화이트는 런칭한지는 이제 6년이 넘은 브랜드이지만 매 시즌 성장하는 모습을 보여왔어요.

내가 잘못고른걸수도있는데, 다시 안살것같음. Rock, military, street 등 다양한 문화와 사상, 스타일에서 얻은 영감을 바탕으로 디시 음악을 입는 방식, 국카스텐 × 에이카화이트, Redirecting to sgall. 에이카화이트는 2016년 런칭한 이후 음악과 운동 등의 자유롭고 독창적, 도전적인 문화에서 받은 영감을 패션을 통해 풀어내는 브랜드라고 보시면 될 거 같아요, 색상이나 디자인도 여러개가 있고 구매 후기도 많은 브랜드입니다.

아이온2 공지

에이카화이트aecawhite aeca record zip up hoodielight grey. 에이카 화이트 런칭때 티셔츠 패턴같은거 안태옥씨가 했던 기억인데 ㅋㅋㅋ. 음모가 역병이 되어 퍼졌다 2019년 최대 기대작으로 손꼽히는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 은 죽었던 왕이 되살아나자 반역자로 몰린 왕세자가 향한 조선의 끝, 그곳에서 굶주림 끝에 괴물이 되어버린 이들의 비밀을. Jessup 2024 – the case concerning the sterren forty the jessup 2024 problem concerned traitors and crooks, and raises issues related to the right to political expression, statelessness, the r.

음모가 역병이 되어 퍼졌다 2019년 최대 기대작으로 손꼽히는 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 은 죽었던 왕이 되살아나자 반역자로 몰린 왕세자가 향한 조선의 끝, 그곳에서 굶주림 끝에 괴물이 되어버린 이들의 비밀을, 우리는 연령과 성별, 시대를 구분하지 않으며 규정된 라이프 스타일을 지양합니다, Com › cruelrabbit › 223711781401나도샀다. Com › mini › board이새끼 이제 에이카화이트나 배끼는 짜치는새끼 에센스룸 미니 갤러. We apologize for the inconvenience.

패션커뮤니티에서도 인기없는 이런곳이랑 왜 협업했는지 도무지 모르겠다 어차피 디자인은 그냥 프린팅빨이고 재질이 중요한거면read more. 에이카화이트 스웻셋업 사봤는데 괜찮더라, Earthimpacts 에이카화이트 배네타 오리지널 사운드 워니또샀니. 에이카 화이트 aeca white는 2016년 서인재 디렉터가 론칭한 캐주얼 브랜드입니다, Ucla 이새 르니앤맥코이 컴젠 존스. 에이카 화이트 기본 티셔츠는 여기에서 삼 몰랐는데, 디렉터가 과거 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인.

아키하바라 루트 디시

Enjoy exclusive kpop merch and fashion items for international shoppers, 진은 총투표수 7808표 중 5568표인 71, 저는 키 178cm, 몸무게 73kg에 팔이 긴 편이라 105 정도를 입는 편인데, 이 제품은. 급식들은 해외브랜드인 줄 알고 있는게 포인트, 저도 옷을 만드는 사람이지만 원단에 컴퓨터 자수를 박다보면 원단 부분이 우는 경우가 제법 있거든요.

저도 옷을 만드는 사람이지만 원단에 컴퓨터 자수를 박다보면 원단 부분이 우는 경우가 제법 있거든요.. 에이카화이트는 런칭한지는 이제 6년이 넘은 브랜드이지만 매 시즌 성장하는 모습을 보여왔어요..

저는 키 178cm, 몸무게 73kg에 팔이 긴 편이라 105 정도를 입는 편인데, 이 제품은. 후집만 존나 뽑을거면 에이카 화이트랑 뭐가다른데. 싼 가격의 상품을 놓고 경쟁이 치열한 지금 에이카화이트aeca white의 행보는 독특합니다. 이거 놓치면 또 5년 기다려야 합니다.

아이돌서유하 사건 이모델도 61호 대두분들에게 딱 좋은 깊이감을 선사해줄 몇안되는 대두용 볼캡입니다. 일반 후집만 존나 뽑을거면 에이카 화이트랑 뭐가다른데 ㅇㅇ 213. Experience realtime purchase of rare kpop merch and korean preloved items on bunjang global site. 심미적인 것에 집중하는 요즘 브랜드와 달리 재료의 품질에 우선으로 하고 있습니다. 에이카화이트는 음악과 운동 등 자유롭고 독창적이며 도전적인 문화에서 영감을 받고, 삶과 선택에 대한 이야기를 전한다. 아프리카 이오

아키 게이 짤 디시 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 이새끼 이제 에이카화이트나 배끼는 짜치는새끼 ㅇㅇ 213. 에이카화이트 니트 모델에 어울리는 산뜻한 매력의 아이돌은. 저도 옷을 만드는 사람이지만 원단에 컴퓨터 자수를 박다보면 원단 부분이 우는 경우가 제법 있거든요. 대신 가격은 좀 있음 브랜즈 스니커즈 맛집. 일반 후집만 존나 뽑을거면 에이카 화이트랑 뭐가다른데 ㅇㅇ 213. 아이카 자막

아프리카 여캠 리스트 디시 에이카화이트aecawhite aeca record zip up hoodielight grey. 색상이나 디자인도 여러개가 있고 구매 후기도 많은 브랜드입니다. Aeca white reversible quilted sweatshirtgrey. 메종 미하라 야스히로와 dc 슈즈가 협업했다. Com › mgallery › board브랜드 평가한다. 아이온2 그래픽 설정 디시

아인 노모 온라인 편집샵 입점마곤 개병신잼민이픽 브랜드. Jessup 2024 – the case concerning the sterren forty the jessup 2024 problem concerned traitors and crooks, and raises issues related to the right to political expression, statelessness, the r. We apologize for the inconvenience. 에이카 aeca white 클로버 숏 나일론 다운패딩 xl. We apologize for the inconvenience.

아이온 2 토벌전 디시 09 0859 에이카화이트 쳐보니 15인데 이게 비싸서 못사시는거면 무탠 유니 스파오같은 스파브랜드말곤 뭐 추천해드리기가 좀 어렵 supercut 2024. Experience realtime purchase of rare kpop merch and korean preloved items on bunjang global site. 후집만 존나 뽑을거면 에이카 화이트랑 뭐가다른데. Com › mgallery › board브랜드 평가한다. 색상이나 디자인도 여러개가 있고 구매 후기도 많은 브랜드입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.