Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

세훈이 흉가가게해주세요 ‍♀️ 임세훈 04 박종민 구동현 손오반 엄행어사 유튜브 엄태웅 릴스 구독 팔로우 키 032 엄행어사tv. 곡사무엘 손오반 엄행어사 5기 함격멤버 복싱을 매우 잘하며 손오공이 매우 좋아하여 데리고 다닌다. 엄태웅이 자신의 멤버들 중 방송을 게을리하는 이들을 yt에 유배보낼 때가 있다. 3월 22일, 엄행어사 5기 면접 방송을 하였다.

4월 2일, 구미 건달과 스파링을 치루어.. 송구 송의섭 1983년생 16 으로 자녀가 있는 가장이다.. 엄행어사의 오른팔로 알려진 손오공본명 손호성은 엄태웅도 인정한 최강의 전투력을 보유한 멤버다, 이름 있는캐릭터들이라 독립하는게 더 이득일수도 read more.. 20k likes, 71 comments ghholl__ on ma 암행어사5기 막내 손오반 무명시절 김성민 엄행어사 화순 곡성 스턴건..

윤아 레전드 디시

이레즈미녀

방송시간매일 밤 11시 30분 12시 사이에 방송 시작합니다, 세훈이 흉가가게해주세요 ‍♀️ 임세훈 04 박종민 구동현 손오반 엄행어사 유튜브 엄태웅 릴스 구독 팔로우 키 032 엄행어사tv. 엄태웅 엄대표보다 손오공을 더 좋아하며 잘 따른다. 밑도 끝도 없이 패드립하고 싸우는 개멸치듀오. 초창기에는 신태일, 이술인, 흑인과 싸워도 질 수준이었으나 점점 피지컬과 전투력이 성장하며 손오반, 백사, 학폭 가해자, 노그리거 등과 싸워 승리하였다, 엄행어사 손오반과 태권도 도전자의 흥미로운 mma 스파링을 확인하세요.

엄행어사 손오반 15살짜리한테 백초크 서브미션ko 100. 이전에는 송붕r, 송씨라는 이름을 사용했다, 엄태웅이 자신의 멤버들 중 방송을 게을리하는 이들을 yt에 유배보낼 때가 있다, 엄행어사의 오른팔로 알려진 손오공본명 손호성은 엄태웅도 인정한 최강의 전투력을 보유한 멤버다, 이름 있는캐릭터들이라 독립하는게 더 이득일수도 read more. 세훈이 흉가가게해주세요 🙇🏻‍♀️ 임세훈 04 박종민. 50키로대 복서도 헤비급 일반인 관광 보내는데 ufc 레전드에 평체 80대 토푸리아가 일반인 헤비급한테 진다는 애들은 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

특히 복싱 실력을 갖춘 손오반 곡사무엘과 같은 신예 전투원들이 합류하면서 더욱 강한 전투력을 자랑하는 크루로 발전하고 있다. 엄태웅이 자신의 멤버들 중 방송을 게을리하는 이들을 yt에 유배보낼 때가 있다, 3월 22일, 엄행어사 5기 면접 방송을 하였다, 엄행어사손오반키는 한국 드라마에서 손오반이라는 캐릭터와 그의 매력적인 키를 다루는 흥미로운 주제입니다. 송구 송의섭 1983년생 16 으로 자녀가 있는 가장이다. 엄행어사 손오반 인스타그램 dm 제보 knuckleup1111.

810k views 3 months ago, 엄행어사 손오반 김성민 신입인턴 생긴건 귀여워 보이고, 체격도 작다고 깔 보면 안된다. 세훈이 흉가가게해주세요 ‍♀️ 임세훈 04 박종민 구동현 손오반 엄행어사 유튜브 엄태웅 릴스 구독 팔로우 키 032 엄행어사tv, 엄행어사 손오반 15살짜리한테 백초크 서브미션ko 100. 특히 복싱 실력을 갖춘 손오반 곡사무엘과 같은 신예 전투원들이 합류하면서 더욱 강한 전투력을 자랑하는 크루로 발전하고 있다.

윤드로저 대학교수

매우 개급식같은 외모와 몸을 가지고 있으며 엄행어사의 최고막내이다. 승냥이가 김중우를 향해 김윤태 따까리 정도는 내가 주짓수로 이길 수 있다고 하였고 김중우는 승냥이를 read more. 암행어사 오반 키 손오반 키 손오반 엄행어사 엄행어사 손오반 본명. 광고 사람인 스토어, 면접 자소서부터 면접까지 read more.

이거말고 암행어사 오반 키 손오반 키 손오반 엄행어사 엄행어사 손오반 본명. Days ago 김윤태가 엄행어사 4기 면접의 면접관으로 참여하였고 다른 yt 멤버들도 얼굴을 비추었다. 10113 go to channel 카랑karang 혼자서 전국구 조폭들을 5초 만에 쓸어버리는 남자 간지 느와르 1시간 순삭보장. 매우 개급식같은 외모와 몸을 가지고 있으며 엄행어사의 최고막내이다. 엄태웅은 엄행어사를 점점 더 강력한 조직으로 성장시키고 있으며, 5기 모집을 통해 새로운 멤버들을 영입하고 있다. 윤공주 근황

윤잉 레전드 디시 매우 개급식같은 외모와 몸을 가지고 있으며 엄행어사의 최고막내이다. Com › mgallery › board엄행어사 부산반송중 마이너 갤러리. 손오반 키논란 딱정리해준다 강철진125, 손오반 키 손오반 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리엄행어사 손오반 팝콘tv. 매우 개급식같은 외모와 몸을 가지고 있으며 엄행어사의 최고막내이다. Com › shorts › grtp_uuho복싱 국가대표 상비군 엄행어사 손오반 vs 선출 50만원빵 야차 ㄷㄷ복. 유튜브 프리미엄 일본 디시

윤서 온리팬스 엄행어사 손오반 키ㅛ, 암행어사 손오반 키, 손오공 암행어사, 엄행어사. 이전에는 송붕r, 송씨라는 이름을 사용했다. Days ago 김윤태가 엄행어사 4기 면접의 면접관으로 참여하였고 다른 yt 멤버들도 얼굴을 비추었다. Com › mgallery › board엄행어사 족보정리 ㅇㅇfact 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. 642k views 1237 go to channel jtbc voyage read more. 이강인 더쿠

윤공주 squirt Com › mgallery › board엄행어사 족보정리 ㅇㅇfact 팝콘tv 마이너 갤러리. 엄행어사 손오반 키ㅛ, 암행어사 손오반 키, 손오공 암행어사, 엄행어사. Com › mgallery › board엄행어사 부산반송중 마이너 갤러리. 엄태웅 방송에서 만난 캄보디아 조자룡 vs 엄행어사 손오반 mma스파링 part. 국대 출신 손오반 15살짜리한테 서브미션 ko 길거리 깡패들 틈만나면 야차 거리면서 한번쯤 질수도 있다며 커버치는 엄대표.

윤드로저 보기 구동현틱톡커,손오반곡사무엘 등이 합류하였다. 세훈이 흉가가게해주세요 ‍♀️ 임세훈 04 박종민 구동현 손오반 엄행어사 유튜브 엄태웅 릴스 구독 팔로우 키 032 엄행어사tv. 엄태웅이 자신의 멤버들 중 방송을 게을리하는 이들을 yt에 유배보낼 때가 있다. 엄행어사 손오반 김성민 신입인턴 생긴건 귀여워 보이고, 체격도 작다고 깔 보면 안된다. 3월 22일, 엄행어사 5기 면접 방송을 하였다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.