Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

크리스탈은 소식을 듣고 많이 놀라고 슬픔을 감추지 못한 것으로 알려졌다. 원하고 원망하죠 애즈원 이민 별세향년 47. 맑고 사랑스러웠던 사람, 믿을 수 없어애즈원 이민 사망에. 1 8 10359 공지 자꾸 이상한방 들어가진다고 글 쓰는 갤럼들 필독50.

카리나 펨돔

캄부알라

케이 잠방 디시

크리스탈은 5월 9일 방송된 kbs 2tv 박보검의 칸타빌레에 이민과 함께 출연해 저희는 고등학교 때부터 친구였다.. 여성 알앤비 듀오 ‘애즈원’ 이민 본명 이민영47이 사망했다.. Com › best › 8751104150단독 애즈원 이민, 5일 저녁 사망&mldr.. Com › view › 20250806n19737단독 애즈원 이민, 5일 저녁 사망자택에서 숨진 채 발견..

친구여친 따먹

애즈원 이민은 8월 6일 자택에서 숨진 채 발견됐는데요. 서민재는 지난 5월 자신과 교제했던 남자친구 j 씨의 신상과 임신, 서민재는 지난 5월 자신과 교제했던 남자친구 j 씨의 신상과 임신. 사실 그가 마이애미 히트가 아닌 la 클리퍼스 이적도 고려했다는 충격적인 소식이 전해졌다.

그룹 애즈원 이민본명 이민영의 사망에 소속사가 애도를 표했다. 애즈원 한국 여가수 1978년 출생 1999년 데뷔 2025년 사망 한국계 미국인 미국으로 귀화한 인물 재한 미국인 한국 영주권자, 애즈원 이민 사망소속사 유가족 큰 충격, 장례 조용히 진행, 6일 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직에 따르면 이민은 지난 5일 오후.

여성 알앤비 듀오 애즈원의 이민이민영이 갑작스럽게 세상을 떠난 가운데, 동료 연예인들의 추모가 이어지고 있다, 지난 5일 저녁 자택에서 숨진 채로 발견됐다. 사망 소식이 전해졌으며, 정확한 사망원인.

케이 감동란 디시

원하고 원망하죠 애즈원 이민, 자택서 돌연 사망.. 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직 측은 이날 고인의 안타까운 소식을 전하게 되어 비통하다.. Com › national › national_general원하고 원망하죠 애즈원 멤버 이민, 자택서 숨진 채 발견.. 사실 그가 마이애미 히트가 아닌 la 클리퍼스 이적도 고려했다는 충격적인 소식이 전해졌다..

이민은 지난 5일 자택에서 숨진 채 발견됐고, 현재 경찰은 정확한 사망 경위를 조사 중이다. 이민님의 사망 소식은 안타까움 그 자체이며, 특히 유가족과 크리스탈님의 슬픔이 깊을 것으로 이해합니다. 현재까지 공식적으로 발표된 애즈원 이민 사인은 없습니다.

카마도 네즈코 여성 알앤비 듀오 ‘애즈원’ 이민 본명 이민영47이 사망했다. 4 애즈원 의 독특한 음색을 맡고 있다. 브랜뉴뮤직 관계자는 6일 디스패치와의 통화. 1 8 10359 공지 자꾸 이상한방 들어가진다고 글 쓰는 갤럼들 필독50. 애즈원은 팝을 연상시키는 세련된 창법과 감미로운 음색으로 너만은 모르길, 데이 바이 데이, 원하고 원망하죠 등을 잇달아 히트시키며 사랑받았다. 카토모모카

캣 데닝스 naked 브랜뉴뮤직은 이민의 사망 소식을 전하며 예정된 음원 발매 일정을 연기하겠다고 발표했다. we would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직에 따르면 8월 6일, 이민이 사망했으며, 현재 경찰 조사중인 상황으로. 브랜뉴뮤직 관계자는 현재 경찰이 조사를 하고 있다면서 결과가 나올 때까지 지나친 억측을 삼가달라고 말했다. 6일 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직 관계자에 따르면 이민은 전날 저녁 자택에서 숨진 채로 발견됐다. 카민 아프리카

캐치티니핑 메리루 단독 애즈원 이민, 5일 저녁 사망자택에서 숨진 채 발견. 소속사에 따르면 이민은 지난 5일 자택에서 사망한 채 발견됐다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 dispatch구민지기자 애즈원 이민본명 이민영46이 사망했다. 0 0 ai챗으로 요약 그룹 애즈원 이민 사진kbs 방송화면 캡처 그룹 애즈원 이민 본명 이민영의 사망에 소속사가 애도를 표했다. 여성 듀오 애즈원이민 크리스탈의 이민본명 이민영이 갑작스럽게 사망해 충격을 주고 있는 가운데, 경찰이 정확한 사인을 수사 중이다. 케데헌 움짤

카나에 나이 가요계 관계자에 따르면 이민은 5일 오후 자택에서 발견된 것으로 알려졌으며 현재 경찰이 정확한 사망 경위를 조사하고 있다. 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직에 따르면 8월 6일, 이민이 사망했으며, 현재 경찰 조사중인 상황으로. Com › article › life애즈원 이민의 비보, 예술계와 팬들의 애도 잇따라. 애즈원의 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직 관계자는 조선닷컴과의 통화에서 이민이 사망한 것은 맞는다면서도 정확한 사망 경위는 알지 못한다. 6 71 19023 공지 디스코드 갤러리 공지8 hostagen 23.

카사노바 다리문신녀 Com › content › 1997628정말 믿기 힘든 짱공유. 8월 5일 저녁, 가요계에 정말 충격적인 소식이 전해졌어요. 하트시그널 시즌3에 출연하며 현대자동차 정비사로 유명세를 얻은 방송인 겸 인플루언서 서민재서은우가 인스타그램에 극단적 선택 자살을 암시하는 유서 글을 작성해 또 다시 서민재와 남친의 임신 사건이 논란이 되고 있습니다. 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직은 갑작스러운 비보에 유가족과 브랜뉴뮤직 모든 임직원들이 큰. 소속사 브랜뉴뮤직 측은 이날 고인의 안타까운 소식을 전하게 되어 비통하다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.