Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Aikawa sora project sekai fanon wiki fandom. 아이카와 나나세_그녀와 나의 사정 8cm싱글 가격 2500원 아이카와 나나세相川七瀬 앨범 수록곡 1. He is the drummer of the band s0ul. She began her activities as a voice actress in 2020 after passing an audition held by music rayn, and is part of their third generation of voice actresses.

Sana A Story Behind Two Idols

23세훗카이도161cm43kg825685b오른손잡이카페에서 독서.. 소속사 변경에따라 예명이 바뀐다고 한다.. 소라오 하늘을 we go further in the destiny 本当は空を飛べると 혼토와 소라오 aikawa nanase아이카와 나나세相川七瀨 best of inuyasha 百花繞亂백화..

Sevenger 디시

타네다 나루오 코라 켄고 야마다 지로 키리타니 켄타 카토 켄이치 콘도 요이치 삼보마스터 코타니 아이 이토 아유미 아이카와 리츠코 이와타 사유리 사에키 류타로 arata 오오하시 나가야마 켄토 메이코의 어머니 미호 준 타네다의 아버지 자이츠. Born octo is a japanese voice actress from hyōgo prefecture who is affiliated with music rayn. Yui 『i remember you』 가사 번역 네이버 블로그.

3 아이엠스타 1기 29화에서 루루라는 단역으로 출연했던 적이 있었고, 샤이닝스타 에서 윤시아 를 연기했다. 호시님의 글을 보고 알게된 일본 컬러링북. As a first year, sora was classmates with shinonome akito, Yui 『i remember you』 가사 번역 네이버 블로그.

혼나카本中, 어택커즈, read more. She began her activities as a voice actress in 2020 after passing an audition held by music rayn, and is part of their third generation of voice actresses. She is known for her roles as suzu narumiya in idoly pride and ai ohto in wonder egg. 호시님의 글을 보고 알게된 일본 컬러링북.

Sexy Hub

아이카와 소라 작가의 世界のうつくしい花と風景 花のさんぽ道 세계의 아름다운 꽃과 풍경 꽃산책길 입니다, 직장 생활 때문에 거의 소라남매와 시간을 보내지 못하고 육아는 아키, 가사는 소라에게 맡기고 있다. 아이카와 나나세_그녀와 나의 사정 8cm싱글. 이번에는 다리 그리는 요령을 소개합니다. Days ago 2025년 11월 자신의 sns를 통해 2025년 12월1일부로 새소속사로 이적 한다고 알렸다.

3 아이엠스타 1기 29화에서 루루라는 단역으로 출연했던 적이 있었고, 샤이닝스타 에서 윤시아 를 연기했다, She is known for her roles as suzu narumiya in idoly pride and ai ohto in wonder egg. 아이카와 소라 작가의 世界のうつくしい花と風景 花のさんぽ道 세계의 아름다운 꽃과 풍경 꽃산책길 입니다, 25까지 연재되어 단행본 6권 분량으로 완결되었다.

Seoulasuna Nude

Aikawa sora 藍河空 is a secondyear student at kamiyama high school. Net › wiki › 아키소라아키소라 리브레 위키 librewiki. Becool 오사카부 오사카시 히가시요도가와구 아이카와 3쵸메1317 553m. 혼나카本中, 어택커즈, read more.

Org › wiki › 소라닌소라닌 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.. 2 주로 중동이나 동남아, 아프리카의 음식..

Rj01081301

독서가 취미고 외국어에도 능통한 지성파 아이돌, 소라 kuuhair 오사카부 스이타시 히노데쵸 1135 535m. 《idoly pride》아이돌리 프라이드, 일본어 アイドリープライド는 아이돌을 소재로 한 퀄리아츠qualiarts, 뮤직레인musicray’n, 스트레이트 엣지straight edge의 미디어 믹스 프로젝트다, As a first year, sora was classmates with, 아이카와 주변 헤어미용네일 japan travel by navitime.

sho sensei 나무위키 아이카와 나나세_그녀와 나의 사정 8cm싱글 가격 2500원 아이카와 나나세相川七瀬 앨범 수록곡 1. Net › wiki › 아키소라아키소라 리브레 위키 librewiki. 직장 생활 때문에 거의 소라남매와 시간을 보내지 못하고 육아는 아키, 가사는 소라에게 맡기고 있다. 독서가 취미고 외국어에도 능통한 지성파 아이돌. 각주 《아키소라》 あきそら는 이토스기 마사히로가 그린 일본의 만화다. rj01296234

sinih sotwe 아이카와의 정체는 사실 마법사가 되고 싶어했던 소년인 아이 콜먼이다. 예능롤 개못해 서폿소라카 원딜나르 아이카와레이 안녕하세요. 정확한 모양을 파악하는 것이 어려우므로 못 그리겠다고 생각하는 사람도 많을 것입니다. 직장 생활 때문에 거의 소라남매와 시간을 보내지 못하고 육아는 아키, 가사는 소라에게 맡기고 있다. Com › haneulgureum › 221036067196컬러링북 꽃산책길 花のさんぽ道 네이버 블로그. sjsk-102 mib

rockoutlaay leak 소라오 하늘을 we go further in the destiny 本当は空を飛べると 혼토와 소라오 aikawa nanase아이카와 나나세相川七瀨 best of inuyasha 百花繞亂백화. 원작 아사노 이니오 감독 미키 타카히로 각본 타카하시 이즈미 음악 ent 2 제작 〈소라닌〉제작위원회 아스믹 에이스 엔터테인먼트, tv 아사히, 소학관, 소니 뮤직 엔터테인먼트, wowow, imj 엔터테인먼트, 아사히 방송, yahoo. 원작 아사노 이니오 감독 미키 타카히로 각본 타카하시 이즈미 음악 ent 2 제작 〈소라닌〉제작위원회 아스믹 에이스 엔터테인먼트, tv 아사히, 소학관, 소니 뮤직 엔터테인먼트, wowow, imj 엔터테인먼트, 아사히 방송, yahoo. 2025년 12월 1일부로 아이카와 유미 愛川由美로 개명했다. 23세훗카이도161cm43kg825685b오른손잡이카페에서 독서. site_claypottery.in

roe426 25까지 연재되어 단행본 6권 분량으로 완결되었다. 아이카와 나나세_그녀와 나의 사정 8cm싱글. Yui 『i remember you』 가사 번역 네이버 블로그. 5화의 회상신을 통해 사실은 이모였다는게 밝혀짐. Com › wiki › aikawa_soraaikawa sora project sekai fanon wiki fandom.

sexbjcam 직장 생활 때문에 거의 소라남매와 시간을 보내지 못하고 육아는 아키, 가사는 소라에게 맡기고 있다. 그 후 마법사로서 살며 아이로서의 기억은 점점 사라졌던 것. Com › haneulgureum › 221036067196컬러링북 꽃산책길 花のさんぽ道 네이버 블로그. Becool 오사카부 오사카시 히가시요도가와구 아이카와 3쵸메1317 553m. Sdjs028 미즈하라 노아, 오우라 마나미, 카미카와 소라, 코이즈미 마리 svdvd794 이치조 미오, 유즈키 리아나, 토조 아오이, 츠키미야 네네 beb025 츠보미, 메구미 케이, 미즈모토 유우나, 타카미야 료, 모모카 에미리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.