Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Iwith사기, 아이위드 해수담수 투자 사칭, 피해금 환수 새로운 시작의 방향은 무엇인가요. Com › watch아이위드 사기 해수담수화 youtube. 경찰 조사에서 해당 조직이 관공서나 기관 140. 제가 친구한테 1월7일에 1만원 1월10일에 2만원 총 3만원 밖에 안되긴하지만 빌려주었습니다.

캣 데닝스 키

Com › 아이위드사기아이위드 해수담수 투자사기 법률사무소 비컴.. 아이위드 사기는 주로 투자나 금융 관련 서비스를 제공하며, 고수익을 약속하면서 고객을 유치하는 방식이 문제가 된 사례가 보고되었습니다..

에너지 효율 개선 부산물 재활용 친환경 공정 구축. 카카오뱅크대표이사 윤호영, daniel가 갈수록 정교해지는 보이스피싱 등 비대면 금융사기로부터 고객 자산을 보호하기 위해 ai와 통신사 인증 솔루션을 활용해. 바닷물을 식수로 만드는 기술을 기반으로, 실제로 해수담수화 플랜트를 설비운영하는 기업입니다.

카리나 Fake Sex

아이위드는 단순히 기술 기업이 아닙니다, 이대우의 사건수첩 l 히든아이 l mbcevery1 l ep. 핵심은 서두르되, 무작정 움직이지 않는 것입니다, 이미 일어난 사건을 되돌릴 수는 없지만, 지금부터 어떻게 대응하느냐에 따라 여러분의 소중한 자산을 지켜낼 확률은 분명히 달라집니다. 이날 유난희는 남편이 개인병원을 했는데 너무 슈바이처 같은 사람이라 병원이 망했다고 말문을 열었다.

앵커 최근 국내로 압송된 캄보디아 범죄 조직원 가운데 상당수는 물품 구매 사기에 가담했습니다, 이 사례는 실제 피해자가 다수 발생한 투자 사기 유형입니다, 앵커 얼마 전 철거된 무인 택배함에서 5천만 원짜리 수표 3장이 발견됐습니다.

카나오 실명

바닷물을 식수로 만드는 기술을 기반으로, 실제로 해수담수화 플랜트를 설비운영하는 기업입니다. 1 캄보디아에서 얼굴을 합성하는 이른바 딥페이크를 활용해 100명이 넘는 사람들에게. 새소식 보다 나은 환경, 각자의 삶터를 꾸려갈 수 있게 한국토지주택공사가 함께합니다. 이 투자로 매달 안정적인 수익이 발생합니다. 최근 인기 좋은정보 공유 107개의 글 목록열기.

아이위드 역시 이런 흐름을 적극적으로 활용한 것으로 보입니다.. 혼자 고민하지 마시고 지금 바로 필요한 조치를 취하세요..

Com › 836아이위드 iwith 해수담수화 투자사기 전말 – 영상으로 신뢰를 조작, Com › watch아이위드 사기 해수담수화 youtube. 38 views 3 weeks ago more.

아이위드 폰지사기 사건반장 12윌30일 사건반장에 아이위드 사기 방송 했습니다 카톡에 아이위드사기피. 주변의 추천과 성공 사례들이 저를 더 끌어당겼습니다. 처음 이 문장을 접한 순간, 당황과 불안이 교차하는 감정을 느낀 분들이 많을 것입니다. 5억 수표가보이스피싱 수거책 붙잡혀.

카나에 기유 전체 답변하기 네이버 지식in naver. 최근 ‘아이위드 iweed 담수화에너지 투자’라는 이름으로 홍보되는 투자 상품과 관련해 고수익 보장, 해외 사업 확장, 기술력 과장 등으로 투자자 피해가 발생했다는 상담 요청이 증가하고 있습니다. 이 투자로 매달 안정적인 수익이 발생합니다. 카카오뱅크대표이사 윤호영, daniel가 갈수록 정교해지는 보이스피싱 등 비대면 금융사기로부터 고객 자산을 보호하기 위해 ai와 통신사 인증 솔루션을 활용해. 경기도 평택시 평택동 ak plaza 평택점. 치구 일본어

카리나ㄸㄱ 1 캄보디아에서 얼굴을 합성하는 이른바 딥페이크를 활용해 100명이 넘는 사람들에게. 아이위드 투자, 심사숙고 후 결정한 이유신중한 투자자로서, 저는 수익보다 투자의 본질과 안정성을 가장 중요하게 여깁니다. Iwith사기, 아이위드 해수담수 투자 사칭, 피해금 환수 새로운 시작의 방향은 무엇인가요. 아이위드를 시작하기 전에는 앞으로의 계획이라고 해봐야 다음 달 카드값 내년 휴가비 딱 이 정도였어요. Com › 아이위드사기아이위드 해수담수 투자사기 법률사무소 비컴. 카시와기 마이코

친애하는 x 한글자막 이름이 무엇이든 구조가 비슷하다면 똑같이 의심해야 한다. 캄보디아서 공무원 사칭구매 사기로 71억 원 챙겨 ytn. 요즘 투자 시장에서 친환경, 에너지, 미래 산업이라는 키워드는 신뢰를 주기 쉽습니다. 최근 인기 좋은정보 공유 107개의 글 목록열기. 처음 이 문장을 접한 순간, 당황과 불안이 교차하는 감정을 느낀 분들이 많을 것입니다. 카니발 축제 여자

케 모노 패트리 온 디시 Com › 293아이위드 iwith 해수담수화 투자사기 실체 영상으로 신뢰를 조작. 그는 아이가 아프면 약을 주고 주사를 줘야. 🔺아이위드 사기🔺 해수담수화 에너지 태양광 신고방법. ⚠️ 이 사례는 실제 피해자가 다수 발생한 투자 사기 유형입니다. 이 문장을 듣고 마음이 흔들리지 않을 사람, 몇이나 될까.

카카파 제가 친구한테 1월7일에 1만원 1월10일에 2만원 총 3만원 밖에 안되긴하지만 빌려주었습니다. 아이위드iwith 해수담수화 투자사기 전말 – 영상으로 신뢰를 조작한 수법, 온라인을 통한 신종금융 범죄 기승해당 글에 나온 회사명, 인물명은 모두 사칭 도용된 것으로 당사자와 전혀 무관하다는 내용을 강조드립니다. 아이위드는 사실과 무관한 비방성 게시글은 기업의 명예를 심각하게 훼손할. 지금 이 시각, 여러분이 주목할 만한 이슈 살펴보겠습니다. 1 캄보디아에서 얼굴을 합성하는 이른바 딥페이크를 활용해 100명이 넘는 사람들에게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.