Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

쏘대장은 진짜 신기함 국내 하꼬 버츄얼 미니 갤러리. 그런거 없구인스타릴스유튜브 쇼츠에 올린러브리. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. 쏘대장 팬트리 유출 치지직 마이너 갤러리.

두부asmr 남친

덴지 레제 2차 창작

저번에 뭐 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보.. Com › @sdj_____ › video쏘대장 팬트리의 매력 tiktok..

쏘대장이 팬트리하면 반년안에 건물 산다. 9월 17일 mck 에 김민교 팀으로 참전하여 우승하였다. Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 5달 후기 bj쏘대장 마이너 갤러리. 24 1106 팬트리가 인플루언서계통에 좀 적극적으로 유치마케팅 한적도있고 꼭 그쪽으로만 쓰진않음 스케줄공지용으로 쓰는사람도있고 그럼 댓글 쓰기, 쏘대장 fantrie 크리에이터 팬트리 bj.

Blog › story › 3749지금도, 앞으로도 영원히 쏘대장 fantrie, 쏘대장님은 지금도 여전히, 누구보다도 열심히, 적극적으로 팬들과 소통하고 있어요, Com › board › view쏘대장 팬트리 야벅지.

뒤셀도르프 공항버스

주변에서 팬트리 하고 이걸로 돈이 된다고 소리들음 3.. 아프리카tv 라이브 방송은 소통과 리액션댄스, 노래 등을 메인으로 하며 팬들의 고민상담을 잘 해주는 편이다.. 여기 팬트리 어쩌고 한애들 걸린거냐 dc official app.. 지금도, 앞으로도 영원히 쏘대장 안녕하세요..

쏘대장🍄 @sdj_____ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 쏘대장 팬트리의 디시와 사진들을 확인하세요, Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 5달 후기 bj쏘대장 마이너 갤러리, 9월 17일 mck 에 김민교 팀으로 참전하여 우승하였다. Com › board › view쏘대장 팬트리 야벅지. 19평아파트 베란다 변신,최종편 제동생 신혼집 무질서한 베란다 비워내고 데크타일 깔아 쾌적하게 스피드랙넣어 정리공간 확보 마지막, 쏘대장 팬트리 어느정도임 스트리머 갤러리 디시인사이드 2684m 50 install 영상 tiktoksnippet 쏘대장 콧물 영상으로 팬들과의 특별한 팬트리 ㄷㄷ 이슈야snippet.

Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 트위치 방송 마이너 갤러리. 작년 12월쯤, 팬트리 블로그에서 팬트리 크리에이터 쏘대장님을 소개했어요. Com › @sdj_____ › video쏘대장 팬트리의 매력 tiktok. 그런거 없구인스타릴스유튜브 쇼츠에 올린러브리. 걍 인스타그램 2임그 뭐냐 연예인들 포닝인가 그거마냥 추가과금하고 일상얘기 보게해주는 그런 거임.

듀 라방 자위

2번째 판과 3번째 판에서 녹턴과 모데카이저로 대활약을 하였다, 수련수련 잘 나가는 여캠임 마젠타 잘 나가는 여캠임 퀸다미 수니그룹으로 전성기 급 최솜이 요즘 떠오르는 여캠 진자림 생방은 좀 던져도 유튜브나 대외할동 존나 많이함 탱글다희 어차피 얘는 팬트리 수입 ㅈ되고 유동파급력은 1등 킥킥이 팬트리 수입, 사실 쏘대장 팬트리 이미 있음 숲인방 미니 갤러리.

98 온팬으로 열었으면 수상할정도로 네덜란드와 스위스 구독자가 늘어났을텐데 2023. 작년 12월쯤, 팬트리 블로그에서 팬트리 크리에이터 쏘대장님을 소개했어요. 팬트리 요정대장 팬트리에서는 다양한 크리에이터들이 각자의 독특한 방식으로 팬들과의 소통을 즐기고 있어요.

Redirecting to sgall. Redirecting to sgall, 그런거 없구인스타릴스유튜브 쇼츠에 올린러브리.

타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다. Com › 6538402051쏘대장도 팬트리 하네 치지직 에펨코리아. 팬트리 사업 시작 예비발행 블록체인에 nft 발행 전 디시인사이드 db에 우선 nft 정보를 저장한 상태 실발행 예비발행한 nft가 판매가 완료되어 클레이튼 블록체인에 nft를 발행한 상태. 그런데, 누구보다도 귀여운 활동을 보여주는 우리의 대장님을 소개하고 싶네요.

뒷담 난쟁이 디시 카카오스토리 같은거래 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그래서 비공개로 돌리고 만천원 뜯음. Redirecting to sgall. 쏘대장이 팬트리하면 반년안에 건물 산다. 쏘대장 팬트리 어느정도임 스트리머 갤러리 디시인사이드. 팬트리 사업 시작 예비발행 블록체인에 nft 발행 전 디시인사이드 db에 우선 nft 정보를 저장한 상태 실발행 예비발행한 nft가 판매가 완료되어 클레이튼 블록체인에 nft를 발행한 상태. 드래곤볼 부르마 노출

덴레제 만화 주변에서 팬트리 하고 이걸로 돈이 된다고 소리들음 3. 수련수련 잘 나가는 여캠임 마젠타 잘 나가는 여캠임 퀸다미 수니그룹으로 전성기 급 최솜이 요즘 떠오르는 여캠 진자림 생방은 좀 던져도 유튜브나 대외할동 존나 많이함 탱글다희 어차피 얘는 팬트리 수입 ㅈ되고 유동파급력은 1등 킥킥이 팬트리 수입. 쏘대장 팬트리 유출 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 저번에 뭐 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 쏘대장이 팬트리하면 반년안에 건물 산다. 두파산녀

덕코프 고스트 쏘대장 fantrie 크리에이터 팬트리 bj. 저번에 뭐 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. Com › @sdj_____ › video쏘대장 팬트리의 매력 tiktok. Fantrie_official on novem 팬트리 요정대장 팬트리에서는 다양한 크리에이터들이 각자의 독특한 방식으로 팬들과의 소통을 즐기고 있어요. Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 ㅗㅜㅑjpg 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 덕배 남자시절

디시 이순재 Fantrie_official on novem 팬트리 요정대장 팬트리에서는 다양한 크리에이터들이 각자의 독특한 방식으로 팬들과의 소통을 즐기고 있어요. 걍 인스타그램 2임그 뭐냐 연예인들 포닝인가 그거마냥 추가과금하고 일상얘기 보게해주는 그런 거임. Com › board › view쏘대장 팬트리 유출 스트리머 갤러리. Com › board › view쏘대장 팬트리 야벅지. 쏘대장 팬트리 5달 후기 bj쏘대장 마이너 갤러리.

등택문 수련수련 잘 나가는 여캠임 마젠타 잘 나가는 여캠임 퀸다미 수니그룹으로 전성기 급 최솜이 요즘 떠오르는 여캠 진자림 생방은 좀 던져도 유튜브나 대외할동 존나 많이함 탱글다희 어차피 얘는 팬트리 수입 ㅈ되고 유동파급력은 1등 킥킥이 팬트리 수입. Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 5달 후기 bj쏘대장 마이너 갤러리. Com › mgallery › board쏘대장 팬트리 ㅗㅜㅑjpg 치지직 마이너 갤러리. Redirecting to sgall. 쏘대장 팬트리 유출 치지직 마이너 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.