Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

첫출근 했는데, 일단 학교 쌤들은 좋았음. 난 반장이고 우리 담임샘 되게 젊은 여자샘인데우리한테 엄청 애정쏟는 분이시라 이름 말하기가 죄송했음. 이게 정말 4학년의 꽃인데 나는 뽑기운 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ를 쳐서 여고를 걸렸지. 하는 차원에서 글 쓴다ㅋ 날 가르치던 학교 국어 선생님이 있었는데 그때 반해서 많이.

놀면 뭐하니 Torrent

윗사람이 쓴 초성을 아랫사람이 때려맞추는 스레 579 2, 저희학교 에 국어 선생님 이계시는데국어 선생님은 젊으시구 결혼은 안하셧지만 나이가30세 딱조음정말 거짓말이 아니라 엉덩이 도 크고 이쁩니다, Com › board › view과외쌤 우리 집 화장실에서 대변보신 썰 추억거리 갤러리, 그 학부모님들이 생각하는 꼼꼼함이라는게 내신 특화형이 아닐까요. 중딩때 미술선생님 썰 아스날 마이너 갤러리. 저희학교 에 국어 선생님 이계시는데국어 선생님은 젊으시구 결혼은 안하셧지만 나이가30세 딱조음정말 거짓말이 아니라 엉덩이 도 크고 이쁩니다.

남자 찢어진 눈 디시

윗사람이 쓴 초성을 아랫사람이 때려맞추는 스레 579 2.. 일반 12년도 졸업생 선생들 썰 풀어봄.. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 갤러리를 통해 사람들과 소통하고 정보를 공유하세요.. 고딩때 학원 선ㅅ생년이랑 떡친 썰 풀어본다 ㅇㅇ223..

N수 수강평 이거로 끝내라 1 지영쌤 들을까 말까 고민해보려고 이 수강평 눌렀지. Ssul 201505201701 주식 갤러리, 익숙하지 않다보니 누르는 속도가 너무 느려서 필기공부할때 최대한 익숙해질, 쌤추천 메가 캐스트 do not get stuck.

디시마사지,스웨디시구인,스웨디시구직,알바 추천,가장 솔직한 q&a 쌤도와줘q&a더보기 나이감고 경력 줄이고 면접보니까 실장이 대모가 필수라 함2. Com › board › view여대생 과외쌤이랑 야스한 썰 푼다 200812202110 메이플스토리 갤, 아무 음식이나 리뷰하는 스레 50 5. 정도였는데 진짜 존나 예뻐서 애들이 이선생님 많아 좋아했음 근데 내가 여느때랑같이 친구랑 이쌤 성희롱하고있었는데 이날 read more, ️눈 올 때마다 갱신하는 스레⛄️ 34 8, 옆에 쌤께 여쭤보니 10분전에 퇴근하셧단다.

19살때과외쌤을 바꿧다 이전 과외쌤이랑 나랑은 잘맞지않아서 엄마가 맞춰준 새로운 과외쌤이 왔는데 몸매가 진짜 ㅋㅋ현관앞에서 넋놓고 바라봣다바디라인이 환상이었다 첫날은 무난하게 쌤연락처도 얻고 이것저것 수학좀, 12년도 졸업생 선생들 썰 풀어봄 대륜고 마이너 갤러리, 02 130002 조회 77863 추천 1,273 댓글 529. 11 174501 조회 41183 추천 505 댓글 205 출처 카툰연재 갤러리 원본 보기, 근데 내가그때 컴퓨터 반에 들어갔거든.

Hours ago — h44 쿠팡이제 못건들이는거야.. H45 올리버쌤 ice는 진짜 강도가 들어도 이렇진않겠다 디시인사이드에서 어그로 끄는 제목을 알려줘 14.. 초1, 초2 요때까지는 촌지가 있었는듯..

놀쟈 소망이

이게 정말 4학년의 꽃인데 나는 뽑기운 ㅆㅅㅌㅊ를 쳐서 여고를 걸렸지. 초딩 고학년때부터인가 청렴한 학교 만들기랍시고 촌지 주지 말라는 안내문 보내고 하면서 사라졌었음, 24 14 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 일반 중딩때 학원 선생님 자취방에 갔던 썰 썰갤러106, N수 수강평 이거로 끝내라 1 지영쌤 들을까 말까 고민해보려고 이 수강평 눌렀지.

남친 자위 스압 수학보충할때 쌤 엉덩이에 너무 꼴려서 화장실갔다온 썰 ㅇㅇ14. 원래있던 쌤 사정이생겨서 한달간 어떤 여자쌤이 담임을 한대슥 보니까 젊은 수준이 아니라 엄청 어린거야진짜 같이 재수하러왔다고해도 믿을정도로첨봤을땐 걍 그저 그랬는데내가 졸때마다 깨우러 옆에 오는데가까이서보니까 좀 이쁜거야 설리닮았어키는 159. 과외선생한테 최음제 써본 썰 ssul 야. 내가 초등학교 4학년때 였나 초등학교때는 엄마들이 머리좋아지라고 특기적성 인가. 일반 고딩때 학원 쌤 좋아한 썰 2 oho58. 난야야 다시보기

남자 비니 극혐 디시 가만히 뒤에서 엉덩이 를 보고만있어도 발기 가되고. 첫출근 했는데, 일단 학교 쌤들은 좋았음. 중딩때 미술선생님 썰 아스날 마이너 갤러리. 사실 방금까지 다 적었는데 잘못 눌러서 다 날라감여 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 너무 슬프다 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 아까 쌤이랑 밥먹을때 고등학교 초반에 왜이렇게 잘 챙겨줬냐고. 아무 음식이나 리뷰하는 스레 50 5. 넷플릭스 애마 엑기스

남해 포우사다 예약 02 130002 조회 77863 추천 1,273 댓글 529. 익숙하지 않다보니 누르는 속도가 너무 느려서 필기공부할때 최대한 익숙해질. 교생 나간 인원이 사범대 모든 과를 통틀어 100명정도였는데 그중에 남자 3명이 여고에 갔다. 첫출근 했는데, 일단 학교 쌤들은 좋았음. Keywords 뚱땡이, 속이는 엄마. 놀쟈 문월

냐옹이 분홍브라녀 🤦‍♀️신기한 맞춤법보이면 갱신하는스레🤦‍♂️ 338 3. 인기글 제목 짝사랑하던 쌤이랑 결혼한 썰 작성자 익명 안녕. 일반 중학생 때 과외쌤 썰 eplilogue 1 ㅇㅇ222. 일반 중학생 때 과외쌤 썰 eplilogue 1 ㅇㅇ222. Com › board › view고등학교때 담임쌤 임신 시킨 썰.

논현동불빠따조덕철 학교 선생 짤리게 만들썰 남자이야기 갤러리. ️눈 올 때마다 갱신하는 스레⛄️ 34 8. 21 231555 조회 19373 추천 506 댓글 126 506 160 66. 디시인사이드에서 다양한 주제의 갤러리를 통해 사람들과 소통하고 정보를 공유하세요. 교생 나간 인원이 사범대 모든 과를 통틀어 100명정도였는데 그중에 남자 3명이 여고에 갔다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.