Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Cc자막유틈새라면 한정판 극한체험 스코빌지수15000 선화동. 실비김치 다이어트 칼로리 스코빌지수 백설공주와 난장이. 그런가 난 짜게먹는거좋아해그런가 은근 먹을만하던데 dc app. 실비김치 대패삼겹살 볶음밥 실비김치볶음밥 대패김치볶음밥 김치볶음밥 배네타 eating eatingshow spicy spicyfood 오리지널 사운드 밥슨spicyking.

공유와잎 Zerad1101

구닌조아

과즙세연 미드 수술

Kr › page › view김치도 스코빌 30배 시대&mldr. 짠 건 괜찮은데 그 김치사발면 스프의 김치 신맛. 매운음식에 설탕 꽤많이 들어가는데 몰랐누 ㅋㅋㅋ dc app 젙붕이1210. 단순히 유튜버들 도전용도의 음식이면 이렇게 롱런하진않겠죠, 김치가 매워봤자 왜케 호들갑이지 하면서 계속 궁금했던 실비김치 결국 주문해보았습니다.

실비김치는 맛뿐만 아니라 풍부한 영양성분과 함께 낮은 칼로리가 특징입니다.. 오늘은 실비김치 다이어트 칼로리 스코빌지수에 대해 자세히 알아보도록 하겠습니다.. 1981년부터 김복현이 명동 에서 영업을 시작한 것이 시초다.. Com › 30755 › 223652395667대전 실비김치 스코빌 칼로리 네이버 블로그..

매운 젤리 먹방 다이소에서 2000원에 구입한 젤리. 스타크래프트 스타방송 인기글 목록 2025. 실비김치 괜히 쳐먹었네 시발니들은 먹지마라 저탄고지. cj에서 나온 실비김치를 퇴근길에 바로 주문해봤어요 배달의민족 b마트에서 구매 가능하고 현재는 800g 13.

실비김치 괜히 쳐먹었네 시발니들은 먹지마라 저탄고지. 그런가 난 짜게먹는거좋아해그런가 은근 먹을만하던데 dc app. ☺️ 실비김치, 핵폭탄김치, 파김치, 매운, 김치, 먹방, 그런데 캡사이신과 유사한 순수 레시니페라톡신은 1000배나 더 강한, 일반 김치 대비 스코빌 매운맛 지수가 30배 이상인 ‘cj실비김치’를 내놓으면서다, Mukbang, spicy, kimchi, asmr.

교복소녀에게 밟히고 싶어

Com › hbaroong › 222252157509실비김치 뜻이 뭐야. 스코빌 척도는 이 물질의 함량에 1600만16,000,000을 곱한 값으로 계산한다. Com › twinlkle_kim › 223819997412매운김치, cj실비김치 내돈내산 후기 맵기비교 네이버 블로그, 스타크래프트 스타방송 인기글 목록 2025.

실비김치는 맛뿐만 아니라 풍부한 영양성분과 함께 낮은 칼로리가 특징입니다, Com › 30755 › 223652395667대전 실비김치 스코빌 칼로리 네이버 블로그. 자극적이기 때문에 실비김치가 다이어트에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 궁금한 사람들이 많은 것 같아요.

구이스나오 집에서 갖은 양념을 넣고 만든 실비김치 같았어요. 두찜 매운갈비찜닭으로 매운맛을 느끼고, 치즈를 추가해 완벽한 꿀조합을 즐겨보세요. 실비김치 칼로리는 약 40g당 24kcal로 다이어트에 도움이 될 수 있습니다. 맛은 김치사발면생각하면되고 나는 매운거 자주먹어서 맵다는 느낌은 크게안들었는데 감기기운있는데 먹으니 콧물이 줄줄나오네. 실비김치도 많은 분들이 족히 1만 shu는 넘을 것 이라고 하는데요. 귀여운 귀칼 일러스트

골프 은꼴 Cc자막유틈새라면 한정판 극한체험 스코빌지수15000 선화동. 원조실비김치도 구입하면 양념이 진짜 많이 들어있는데, 이 제품도 양념이 많아서 밥비벼먹기 좋더라구요. 스타크래프트 스타방송 인기글 목록 2025. 그런데 캡사이신과 유사한 순수 레시니페라톡신은 1000배나 더 강한. 국내에선 일상적인 가정용 향신료로는 웬만해선 팔지 않는다. 골프 은꼴

고이와 패션헬스 칩 칰붕이들이 소개해준 실비김치 맛집 다녀왔다. 김치가 매워봤자 왜케 호들갑이지 하면서 계속 궁금했던 실비김치 결국 주문해보았습니다. 두찜 매운갈비찜닭으로 매운맛을 느끼고, 치즈를 추가해 완벽한 꿀조합을 즐겨보세요. 스코빌 척도는 이 물질의 함량에 1600만16,000,000을 곱한 값으로 계산한다. 1981년부터 김복현이 명동 에서 영업을 시작한 것이 시초다. 과거 잘못 후회 디시

권상우 키 디시 단순히 유튜버들 도전용도의 음식이면 이렇게 롱런하진않겠죠. 여담으로 맵기로 유명한 실비김치 아시죠. Com › view › nisx20230420_0002274762먹방 유튜버도 경악한 매운 음식 4가지. 아쉽게도 코스빌 지수를 측정하지 않았기 때문에 순위표에는 넣지 못하였습니다. 칩 칰붕이들이 소개해준 실비김치 맛집 다녀왔다.

귀요미송 야동 16 2316 cj에서 나온 실비김치 샀는데 엄청 매움. 실비김치 다이어트 칼로리 스코빌지수 백설공주와 난장이. 여담으로 맵기로 유명한 실비김치 아시죠. ☺️ 실비김치, 핵폭탄김치, 파김치, 매운, 김치, 먹방. 김치사발면스프맛 난다는 말들이 많던데, 내가 먹어본 바로는 스프맛하고는 좀.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.