The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
Tenor에서 최고의 gif를 탐색하고 공유해 보세요. 사실 저갈로 불타는 철가루가 엄청 작아서 피부에 닿아도 별로 안뜨겁다고함. 본래 많이 모습을 선보인 단역이지만단역이라 하기엔 애매하고 본래 신태일은 나중에 출연시킬 예정이였다. Com › gif › ai6r86신태일 전쟁빙의ㅋㅋ on make a gif.
신태일 gif 신태일 하이패스 레전드 신태일 꿀잼컨텐츠 기분이 너무나 좋아요 춤 신태일 22년 연말송년회 뚱구 지하철 빌런 신태일 코카인 댄스 미친 신태일 하이패스.. Com › board › view실시간 신태일 움짤 만들어 봄 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋgif 201910202110 스트리머.. 추천 2 2 이미지 태일이 또 정지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ.. 음지계 유튜버 신태일 생방중 체포영장 집행..Discover & share this 신태일 gif with everyone you know. 본인도 무서워서 1년에 두번인가 암검사 받는다던데 그분 올해 암으로 돌아가심. 페이스북과 유튜브 등지에서 초등학생들을. 신태일 이 2017년 2월 18일 업로드한 한국 애니메이션 탱구와 울라숑 의 오프닝 송 을 개사해 춤을 추는 영상.
02 움짤 로알아문센 조회2107 추천3. Myinstants에서 더 많은 인스턴트 사운드 버튼을 찾아보세요, 673k likes, 4,129 comments shintaeil12 on 신태일 vs 아이쇼스피드 angry korean gamer vs ishowspeed 아이쇼스피드 ishowspeed. 페이스북과 유튜브 등지에서 초등학생들을 중심으로 퍼져 나갔고, 나아가 푸워, 철구, 브베, 강유미 1 에게까지 전파되었다, Com › 2857108048혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일.
Com › 7775124351실시간 신태일 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. Iverify ang iyong youtube account upang maaccess ang mga karagdagang tampok at mapahusay ang iyong channel. 유머움짤이슈 이슈 인기글 목록 2025. Added 11 years ago yasuko in funny gifs. Mbs on j 골끼퍼 태이 신태일크루 이술인 신태일 koreangirl goal.
Source watch the full video create gif. ㅎㅎ 아니면 선거에서 무조건 이긴다는 확신이 있는건가. 유머움짤이슈 이슈 인기글 목록 2025, 05 1015 혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일.
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 어디서 본건지 모르지만 구독인지 트윗인지 팔로우인지 뭔지 어쨌든 쟤를 구독해놨다는거에서 넌 비추임. Com › view › 신태일angrygif24543576신태일 angry gif 신태일 angry discover & share gifs. 대인 관계 편집 신태일 막장 컨셉 계열의 1세대 선배 격이자 자신의 롤모델인 인물. 지 일베계정에다가 올림 어그로 끌었다고 치자 일베가 느그한테 놀아나는 개냐. 문재인씨 추천0조회904댓글 글번호 20230114 2140 ip 58, 신태일 angry – otkrijte i dijelite gifove.
이술인이 소속된 노애미크루 의 수장이기도 하다. 05 1015 혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일. 담배 끊읍시다 한다리 건너 지인이 외가쪽 전부다 암으로 돌아가심. 02 움짤 로알아문센 조회2107 추천3. 넌 잘못건든거야 새꺄 신태일 여친 인스타 신태일 친동생 유튜브 신태일 할머니 왼 친동생 우 신태일 본인이 집주소 올림 일베로 1012 민주화 32 목록.
05 1015 혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일, 02 1115 포텐 신태일 근황 무허가 조회 수 559213 추천 수 730 댓글 535 s. Check out these funny gifs 2 202 1 7 80. 신태일 angry discover & share gifs, Stl639 @stl639 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 신태일 차 빼달라는척 하고 키티자전거 주차하기추천 추천떠라 신태일 신태일클립저장소 예으뜸. 부동산 건드리고도 살아남은 정부가 있나.
담배 끊읍시다 한다리 건너 지인이 외가쪽 전부다 암으로 돌아가심, Added 5 months ago anonymously in gaming gifs. Board containing this pin. 페이스북과 유튜브 등지에서 초등학생들을, Check out these funny gifs 2 202 1 7 80.
websites like kemono 오프닝은 버터플라이 안쓰더라 2020. 신태일 angry discover & share gifs. Chultae123 angry korean gamer screaming. 신태일 푸바오 사운드를 듣고 공유하세요. 신태일이 2017년 2월 18일 업로드한 한국 애니메이션 탱구와 울라숑의 오프닝 송을 개사해 춤을 추는 영상. twi_video
www.ivancity.com 댓글로 가기 6 Com › 2857108048혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일. 처음 만난 사람한테는 낯을 가리며 친한 동생인 정자왕이 폭행을 당했을 당시. 페이스북과 유튜브 등지에서 초등학생들을 중심으로 퍼져 나갔고, 나아가 푸워, 철구, 브베, 강유미 1 에게까지 전파되었다. 차 빼달라는 척 키타 자전거 주차하기오리지널 사운드 % stl639. 23 메이플 아 이 새ㅡ끼 공사치는것봐 46 메이플 결정석이 3억인 보스가 있네. urboypunpunn
vk 동영상 검색 레지기가스 편에서 조연으로 등극하였다. ㅎㅎ 아니면 선거에서 무조건 이긴다는 확신이 있는건가. 오늘 열린 신태일 재판요약 하프타임 樂soccer. 본래 많이 모습을 선보인 단역이지만단역이라 하기엔 애매하고 본래 신태일은 나중에 출연시킬 예정이였다. 지 일베계정에다가 올림 어그로 끌었다고 치자 일베가 느그한테 놀아나는 개냐. twi터
uncensored hentai succubus 성격 및 성향 방송과는 다르게 실제로는 조용하고 말이 없는 편이다. 과학적 배합 이뮨비타민 액상과 정제&캡슐을 한 번 read more. Illit윤아 gif 2 동영상 첨부파일. Com › gif › ai6r86신태일 전쟁빙의ㅋㅋ on make a gif. 넌 잘못건든거야 새꺄 신태일 여친 인스타 신태일 친동생 유튜브 신태일 할머니 왼 친동생 우 신태일 본인이 집주소 올림 일베로 1012 민주화 32 목록.
www.shamster.com Gif twitch to gif video to gif webcam to gif upload a gif. Likes, 0 comments gndr. Com › 2857108048혼자서 공중제비 도는 신태일. Discover and share the best gifs on tenor. Find more instant sound buttons on myinstants.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
신태일 푸바오 사운드를 듣고 공유하세요., Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.
