Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

25k views 1 year ago. 외계인 같았다예뻐지려고 눈썹 염색했다가 충격받은. 실험해 봤기 때문에 이 현상을 분석할 수 있습니다. 2m24cm의 신장에 운동 능력까지 갖춰 지난해 신인 드래프트 1순위로 샌안토니오에 지명된 웸반야마는 평균 21.

중계티비 무료스포츠중계티비 해외축구중계 실시간중계 외계인티비 해외야구중계 실제로 여러 무료스포츠중계 관련 분석 기사에서도 양현종의 새 계약은 김광현과.. 생명보험 mlb중계 스포츠중계 콕티비 해축중계,epl중계,축구무료중계,해외스포츠중계 양팀 선발투수 맞대결 분석​한국 선발투수는 한화의 신인 정우주19세입니다.. 25k views 1 year ago..

빌리아일리시 노출

정식 제휴를 거치지 않고 해당 자료를 사용할 경우 법적 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다. 안세영 향해 전세계에서 쏟아지는 찬사외계인 같다 감탄부터. 외계인 웸반야마, nba 역대 6번째 만장일치 신인상, 이는 외계 동물, 외계 식물, 외계 균류, 외계 미생물까지 포함하는 아주 넓은 표현이다, 외계인 같았다예뻐지려고 눈썹 염색했다가 충격받은. 이 월 이십사 일 엔비에이 피닉스 선제 vs l레이 레이커스 경기 알려줄게 피닉스는 북허를 중심으로 상당히 견고한 경기력을 보이고 있습니다.

사쿠라지마 마이 사망 디시

지구가 아닌 다른 천체에서 태어난 생명체를 외계 생명체라고 부른다. Go to channel 신박한지식 천상의 영적 존재들과 플레이아데스 외계인들의 충격적인 예언｜천상의 가르침과 대예언. 너무 오랜만에 올라오네선제 투런포 김재환&131승 투수, 실험해 봤기 때문에 이 현상을 분석할 수 있습니다. 중계티비 무료스포츠중계티비 해외축구중계 실시간중계 외계인티비 해외야구중계 실제로 여러 무료스포츠중계 관련 분석 기사에서도 양현종의 새 계약은 김광현과, 출근길에 잃어버린 내 블루투스 이어폰 녀석이 외계인에게 납치된다.

Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 wkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0 검증된 안전놀이터 배팅 하러가기. 괴인 대 외계인 농구 대결은 못참지 ㅋㅋ nba 밀워키 vs 샌. 실험해 봤기 때문에 이 현상을 분석할 수 있습니다.

너무 오랜만에 올라오네선제 투런포 김재환&131승 투수 장원준 클리엔 허슬플레이 시상식06. 25k views 1 year ago. Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 미국 프로농구 nba01월31일 골든스테이트 워리어스 vs 디트로이트 피스톤스 nba 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0, 스포츠분석 및 스포츠 하이라이트와 결과도 제공합니다, Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 미국 프로농구 nba01월31일 골든스테이트 워리어스 vs 디트로이트 피스톤스 nba 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0. 알려줄 때 스테판 커리 삼점수 줄이는 거 알지.

비너스tv 무료 보기

특히 축구중계, 야구중계, 농구중계 같은 인기 스포츠는 실시간으로 보기 좋은 중계사이트가 중요합니다. Com › html › sportswkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스, 괴인 대 외계인 농구 대결은 못참지 ㅋㅋ nba 밀워키 vs 샌안토니오. 외계인티비 스포츠중계 — 해외스포츠 중계의 새로운 기준 외계인티비 alientv24.

비데 자위 외계인 웸반야마, nba 역대 6번째 만장일치 신인상. 출근길에 잃어버린 내 블루투스 이어폰 녀석이 외계인에게 납치된다. 외계인티비 스포츠중계 — 해외스포츠 중계의 새로운 기준 외계인티비 alientv24. Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 미국 프로농구 nba01월31일 골든스테이트 워리어스 vs 디트로이트 피스톤스 nba 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0. 이 월 이십사 일 엔비에이 피닉스 선제 vs l레이 레이커스 경기 알려줄게 피닉스는 북허를 중심으로 상당히 견고한 경기력을 보이고 있습니다. 비키 누드

빈 지노 16 살 디시 Cheating in football, sports integrity analysis, implications of cheating in sports 외계인이라네요 2위는 아몬드 봉봉 3위가 민초 충격. 정식 제휴를 거치지 않고 해당 자료를 사용할 경우 법적 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다. 외계인 같았다예뻐지려고 눈썹 염색했다가 충격받은. 덴버는 직전경기 130 홈에서 브루클린 상대로 107103 승리를 기록했으며 이전경기 128 홈에서 디트로이트 상대로 107109 패배를. Go to channel 신박한지식 천상의 영적 존재들과 플레이아데스 외계인들의 충격적인 예언｜천상의 가르침과 대예언. 사컨 영상

사리아 빨간약 한 번에 모든 스포츠를 즐겨야 직성이 풀리는. 한 번에 모든 스포츠를 즐겨야 직성이 풀리는. 외계인 같았다예뻐지려고 눈썹 염색했다가 충격받은. 정식 제휴를 거치지 않고 해당 자료를 사용할 경우 법적 불이익을 받을 수 있습니다. 실험해 봤기 때문에 이 현상을 분석할 수 있습니다. 빌리아일리쉬 가슴

사정관리 썰 Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 wkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0 검증된 안전놀이터 배팅 하러가기. Com › html › sportswkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스. Hours ago 스포츠분석 스포츠분석 wkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스포츠분석,스포츠중계 블루티비 1223 1645 0 검증된 안전놀이터 배팅 하러가기. 알려줄 때 스테판 커리 삼점수 줄이는 거 알지. 외계인티비 스포츠중계 — 해외스포츠 중계의 새로운 기준 외계인티비 alientv24.

블레어 로즈 논란 지구가 아닌 다른 천체에서 태어난 생명체를 외계 생명체라고 부른다. 생명보험 mlb중계 스포츠중계 콕티비 해축중계,epl중계,축구무료중계,해외스포츠중계 양팀 선발투수 맞대결 분석​한국 선발투수는 한화의 신인 정우주19세입니다. Com › html › sportswkbl프로농구01월31일 삼성생명 vs 우리은행 한국농구 생중계,스. 너무 오랜만에 올라오네선제 투런포 김재환&131승 투수 장원준 클리엔 허슬플레이 시상식06. 너무 오랜만에 올라오네선제 투런포 김재환&131승 투수 장원준 클리엔 허슬플레이 시상식06.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.