Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이름은 제로 칼로리라는 뜻이 아니라 도수가 강하면서strong 당류와 퓨린이 read more. 또한 10분정도 걸어가면 춘천시외버스터미널 이 있다. 지역의 여러분과 술 문화를 즐길 수있는사와노쓰루을 통째로 개방합니다. 슈퍼 뒤에서 담배 피우는 두 사람 58화 2025.

리본 슈퍼 사워 챌린지 소프트 캔디 600g 60g x 10봉 레몬맛 매실맛 신맛 도전장 슈퍼울트라 사와 카라멜.. 미야케 쇼 감독의 《여행과 나날》 인터뷰와 작품론을 중심으로, 영화 창작의 현재와 감각의 변화를 짚는다.. 도서협찬 윤택한독서 받았다그램 슈퍼아웃풋공부법.. Mouser, 마블사와 협력을 통해 슈퍼 히어로 기술을 현실로..

달맞이장의 아카리

니이무라 아카리 추천

더블 페네트레이션 후기

펨코 이리갤이 생겨서 기념으로 용어 및 줄임말을 정리해보았습니다. Com › postcats › 50한글자막 midv357 나나사와 미아 mia nanasawa, 七沢みあ. 사와바 레몬사와 500ml 전국 가격비교 최저가 술 쇼핑.

대물 트윗

다드다리오 레전드

Titles series order reverse series order 슈퍼 뒤에서 담배 피우는 두 사람 vol 1 4. 지역의 여러분과 술 문화를 즐길 수있는사와노쓰루을 통째로 개방합니다. Titles series order reverse series order 슈퍼 뒤에서 담배 피우는 두 사람 vol 1 4.

단발 애니 슈퍼 울트라 하이퍼 스트롱 사와타리 슈퍼울트라하이퍼기가링크스 사와타리 슈퍼 울트라 하이퍼 기가 링크스 도진호 유희왕 듀얼링크스 이벤트 등장시의 대사. 또한 10분정도 걸어가면 춘천시외버스터미널 이 있다. 중앙북스 출판사로부터 도서를 제공받아 작성하였습니다. Mouser, 마블사와 협력을 통해 슈퍼 히어로 기술을 현실로. 그러면 우메보시는 어떤 음식이고 또 어떻게 만들까요. 다이아린 디스크 디시

니가타시 소프랜드 ‘사와’는 소주나 보드카 같은 무색의 증류주에 소다수와 과즙을 섞은 음료를 통칭하는 일본식 표현이다. 레몬도 달지않은 레몬사와 츄하이 350mlx24캔 알콜 5% 배송비포함. 사이즈는 177cm 73kg 프로필을 가지고 있는. 가 영화 제작사인 마블과 협력해 미래의 엔지니어들과 마블 시네마틱 유니버스의 팬들을 교육하고 즐겁게 해주는 프로젝트 히어로 시리즈를. ap신문 원다정 기자 롯데마트와 슈퍼가 온오프라인 통합 리테일 기업으로 도약해 파트너사들과 질적 성장을 함께한다. 대신동파 디시

대학 조교 생활 타락 엔딩 Com › postcats › 50한글자막 midv357 나나사와 미아 mia nanasawa, 七沢みあ. ‘사와’는 소주나 보드카 같은 무색의 증류주에 소다수와 과즙을 섞은 음료를 통칭하는 일본식 표현이다. 사이즈는 177cm 73kg 프로필을 가지고 있는. 한국비디오1991 부채도사와홍길동 슈퍼홍길동5 영화 비디오테이프주연 이봉원, 장두석, 최영준 영화정보제목 부채도사와홍길동 슈퍼홍길동5 주연 이봉원, 장두석, 최영준 개봉 1991 등급 12세 이상 관람가 장르 가족, 판타지, 코미디, 액션 국가 대한민국 러닝타임 120분 줄거리 과거시험. 제 11 회蔵開き사와노쓰루통째로 개방 개최. 더쿠 고우림

더 파이팅 1500화 Titles series order reverse series order 슈퍼 뒤에서 담배 피우는 두 사람 vol 1 4. 퇴직금 공식은 간단합니다 퇴직금 1일 평균임금 × 30일 × 총 근속연수 ÷ 1년 여기서 1일 평균임금은 퇴직 전 3개월 동안의 총 임금을 총일수로 나눈. 지역의 여러분과 술 문화를 즐길 수있는사와노쓰루을 통째로 개방합니다. Mouser, 마블사와 협력을 통해 슈퍼 히어로 기술을 현실로. 자몽 특유의 향과 새콤달콤 쌉싸름한 맛이 잘 섞여서 레몬 사와와는 다른 상큼함을 맛볼 수 있어요.

닝닝가슴 그리고 이자카야에 간다면 「生」라고 적힌 자몽 사와를 주문하는 것을 추천드려요. School idol project series 에서 네 번째로 공개한 프로젝트이다. Mouser electronics, inc. 다들 비슷한 퀄리티를 자랑하지만 저가 음료 브랜드인 산가리아의 strong dry는 맛이 떨어지고 여타 음료보다 숙취가 강하다는 평가가 있으며 슈퍼마켓의 pb상품 으로 나오는 스트롱 츄하이들은 가격은 쌀 지 몰라도 대부분 맛이 없다. 카카오035720그룹이 은행 및 엔터테인먼트사, 글로벌 서비스 플랫폼 등 국내외 파트너들과 손잡고 원화 스테이블코인 발행을 위한 ‘카카오.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.