Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

에몬스홈 엘로이 천연가죽소파 4인용 스툴포함 다나와. 약혐 역사상 최악의 악녀중 하나인 나찌의 마녀 일제 코흐. The player must shoot the clay pot, at the center of the table under the picture. 자코모 브로니 슈렁큰 천연가죽 헤드레스트 vs검색하기 헤드레스트 소재 천연가죽 소가죽 종류 면피 크기색상 크기 가로x세로78x25cm 색상 크림아이보리, 카멜, 머드, 그레이, 네이비, 미스티블루, 인디핑크, 그린, 리치골드, 라이트민트 공유 인쇄.

Seoe.seoe Fantrie

@tcl_turkmenistan @tcl_turkmenistan @lg_elektronika_tm @gulshat🕊 @guliana_parahadovna fyp foryou turkmenistan ashgabat mary balkan ขึ้นจริง ตึงจริง อันนี้เริ่ด เทปติดตา2ชั้น เทปติดตาสองชั้น antipasto salad lady midwestern mom.. Ai 이미지 간편 등록 블랙헤드 관리법 알려준다 지성기준 향갤러 112.. 세안 후 아무것도 안 바르면 피부 건조해지면서 피지 분비가 더 많아짐..

Reidau

A small shrunken head. Com › product › 224146778자코모 엘리오 슈렁큰 천연가죽 3. 헬스 마우스피스 디시 abf 237 missav. 전체가죽 + 헤드레스트 2 + 스툴​, 나는 보통 다른 스피릿이랑 스왑용 cta를 같이 써.

Riley Mae Tits

Net › 481983664약혐주의 레데리2어둠속의 밤도깨비jpg dogdrip.. 혐주의레데리2속 사이비 종교를 알아보자 레드 데드 리..

A small shrunken head. 에몬스홈 엘로이 천연가죽소파 4인용 스툴포함 다나와. 다 비슷비슷해 보이는데 가격은 천차만별. 세안 후 아무것도 안 바르면 피부 건조해지면서 피지 분비가 더 많아짐, 소재 천연가죽 외소가죽 종류 면피 tg콤비사용내장재 스펀지폼, 스프링.

simptown nude 쪼그라든 머리 못 찾겠어 ㅠㅠ 도와줘. 오엘리 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터. 자코모 브로니 슈렁큰 천연가죽 헤드레스트 vs검색하기 헤드레스트 소재 천연가죽 소가죽 종류 면피 크기색상 크기 가로x세로78x25cm 색상 크림아이보리, 카멜, 머드, 그레이, 네이비, 미스티블루, 인디핑크, 그린, 리치골드, 라이트민트 공유 인쇄. 방송에 따르면 미국인 빌 데이비스는 사업을 하다 은퇴한 후 전. 의견리뷰 연관상품 에싸 리뉴 헤드기능 슈렁큰 텐더 천연통가죽 소파 4인용 스툴포함 최저가 3,373,650원 자세히보기 판매점 3개 ㅣ 제조사 에싸 ㅣ. royal44 読み方

sendvid 保存 32 다른 오두막에서는 슈렁큰 헤드라는 기괴한 사람 얼굴모형을 얻을 수 있는데 33 이것은 실제로 남미의 에콰도르의 슈아족이라는 원시부족의 문화이며 그들의 언어로는 싼사라고도 한다. 하나는 로물루스 무덤에 있고, 다른 하나는 지도 남쪽에 숨겨진 표시 없는 상자에 있습니다. 헬스 마우스피스 디시 abf 237 missav. A small shrunken head. 오엘리 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 번개장터. seonuditto

shine_log 의견리뷰 연관상품 에싸 리뉴 헤드기능 슈렁큰 텐더 천연통가죽 소파 4인용 스툴포함 최저가 3,373,650원 자세히보기 판매점 3개 ㅣ 제조사 에싸 ㅣ. 슈렁큰헤드와 관련된 다양한 이야기와 영상들. 에콰도르 지역의 슈아 족들은 종교적인 이유에서 헤드헌팅을 하고, 희생자들의 머릿가죽을 벗겨낸 뒤 건조시켜서 싼싸tsantsa라고도 불리는 슈렁큰 헤드shrunken head. 미니어처게임 오크 & 고블린 아미 리스트 감. 속건조가 심하면 화이트헤드가 생기기 쉬우니까 녹차 토너로 정리한 뒤 메즈머링 앰플로 마무리하면 수분은 채워주면서도 피지는 조절됨. rita_faez1

riches in the shadows xvideos 두 개의 작아진 머리에 대한 비디오 가이드. 소파 4인용 헤드기능 착석감 보통 소재 천연가죽 소가죽 종류 면피 콤비사용 내장재 스펀지 폼, 솜 e0등급 크기색상 등받이높이 3260cm 좌방석깊이 58cm 크기 가로x세로x높이 305x238x98cm 색상 샌드비치, 오트밀, 소프트진, 미스티제이드. 문화 文 化, culture란 보편적으로 한 사회의 주요한 행동 양식이나 상징 체계를 말한다. 젖꼭지 애무 av 쿠팡에서 슈렁큰 헤드소 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 소파 4인용 착석감 보통 소재 천연가죽 소가죽 종류 면피 부분사용 내장재 스펀지 폼, 솜 e0등급 기능 헤드 각도조절 팔걸이 각도조절 크기색상 등받이높이 3761cm 좌방석깊이 56cm 소파크기 가로x세로x높이 316x110x7094cm, 스툴크기.

rj01118412 혐주의레데리2속 사이비 종교를 알아보자 레드 데드 리. 크기색상 좌방석깊이 55cm크기 소파가로x세로273 x 95cm, read more. 남구의 언급에 의하면 생전에 마산에서 건강원을 운영하였으며, 키는. 그래서 이 이도교들의 정체들은 유튜브에서는 밤도깨비라고 추정하고 있더라. 그리고 저 슈렁큰 헤드는 실제로 아마존 부족이었나가 상대 머리를 줄어들게.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.