Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

중국 산동항공 이코노미 좌석과 기내식 후기 인천칭다오. 중국 산동항공 이코노미 좌석과 기내식 후기 인천칭다오. 산동항공 탑승부터 디디 택시까지 완벽 후기. 기종은 33 배열의 좌석, 좌석 간 간격은 좁은 편이라 덩치가 있는 분들에겐 조금 불편할 수 있어요.

해외여행 가고 싶은데 비행기 표 값이 부담스러울 때 많잖아요.. 중국 항공사 한 10번 넘게 타봤는데 항공 마이너.. 산동항공 후기 여행자들이 산동항공을 이용하면서 남긴 다양한 후기를 살펴보겠습니다..

@cdmeeng2

Ahoo0808_

중국 산동항공 무료 수하물 정보 저는 중국갈때 말고도 푸켓, 발리, 유럽 갈때도 중국항공사를 자주 이용하는 편인데요, 그 이유는 딱 2가지입니다. 이번에 신장갈때 산동항공 탔었는데 배낭여행 마이너. 1️⃣ 저렴한 가격 2️⃣ 무료 위탁수하물 제가 이용한 산동항공외에 모든 중국항공사는 제일 저렴한 항공권에도, Com › thdud_ › 223455231048중국 칭다오여행 산동항공 탑승후기 + 수화물, 좌석, 기내식 꿀팁. 산동항공에 대하여 산동항공은 1994년에 설립되었고 본사는 중국의 산둥성 지난시 리샤 구에 있습니다. 저는 입출국 둘 다 경유를 했고 최저가인 산동항공을 예약했습니다.

@kunkunkun181

산동항공 탑승부터 디디 택시까지 완벽 후기. 또한, 중국 산동항공은 이륙 후 어느정도 시간이 지나면 물과 기내식을 줍니다. 산동항공 결항 ㅈ같네 여행중국, 홍콩, 마카오. 산동 항공 산동지역을 이동하기 나쁘지 않은 항공편 산동 항공에 대한 121건의 리뷰, 60건의 사진과 특가정보를 확인하세요. 산동항공 후기 여행자들이 산동항공을 이용하면서 남긴 다양한 후기를 살펴보겠습니다.

4k Jav

🇨🇳 이번에 지난, 대련, 칭다오를 다녀올 때 중국 산동항공을 이용 했어요. 중국 연태 지역으로 다녀왔고, 산동항공 왕복으로 이용했어요, 일단 산동항공은 중국 국적기의 lcc이다, 칭다오 항공권 산동항공으로 다녀온 후기 20. 중국 칭다오여행 중국 산동항공 후기 카운터, 기내식 등. 저도 정말 그런 고민을 많이 했었는데, 이번에 산동항공 을 이용해 인천에서 중국 옌타이 로 떠나게 되었어요.

@gugim368425 칭다오 산동항공 보잉737800 상세후기 공항 디디택시 타는곳 네이버 블로그 chinahongkong 30개의 글 목록열기. 산동항공에 대하여 산동항공은 1994년에 설립되었고 본사는 중국의 산둥성 지난시 리샤 구에 있습니다. 중국내에서도 말이 많다는 무서운 산동항공. 중국의 항공사 중 하나인 산동항공에서는 이 회사의 마일리지 프로그램인 피닉스 마일즈를 공용하고 있다. 생활 정보 산동항공 이용 가이드 후기, 예약 방법, 체크인 팁 완벽 정리. 4p pikpak

@__go_mu 14 16 이번 여행의 항공편은 산동항공으로 예약. 중국의 항공사 중 하나인 산동항공에서는 이 회사의 마일리지 프로그램인 피닉스 마일즈를 공용하고 있다. 고우투게이트 gotogate 츄드 chuu레코드. 산동항공 칭다오 제공 어메니티 제공 어메니티는 없습니다. 🇨🇳 이번에 지난, 대련, 칭다오를 다녀올 때 중국 산동항공을 이용 했어요. ahyeon_uu twitter

@miong_cat Com › pororin_hamong › 224079271174칭다오행 산동항공 sc4620 sc4619 탑승후기 좌석, 기내식 등. 산동항공 타고 옌타이 여행, 정말 7만원에 가능할까요. 저는 입출국 둘 다 경유를 했고 최저가인 산동항공을 예약했습니다. 산동항공 탑승후기 + 수화물, 좌석,기내식 깨알 꿀팁을 정리했는데 어떠신가요. 산동항공 타고 옌타이 여행, 정말 7만원에 가능할까요. 67cw_2

afc2ppv Com › thdud_ › 223455231048중국 칭다오여행 산동항공 탑승후기 + 수화물, 좌석, 기내식 꿀팁. 지난 야오창 국제공항 tna을 허브로 삼고 있으며 베이징서우두 국제공항 pek, 칭다오 류팅 국제공항 tao, 옌타이 펭라이 국제공항 ynt을 거점 도시로 삼고. 추천 0 1 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 솔직히 처음 들어보는 항공사라 조금 걱정되기도 했지만, 왕복으로 10만 원대라는 엄청난 가격에 혹해서 바로 예약했죠. 가격이나 서비스 측면에서 매우 만족스러웠음.

4798512 체크인 과정부터 수하물 규정, 기내식, 탑승후기 알려드리겠습니다. Com › gmlwlsrnt1 › 223310243618최악이지만. 기내 엔터테인먼트도 훌륭하고 승무원들도 항상 미소짓고 있어서 기분이 좋아짐. 체크인 과정부터 수하물 규정, 기내식, 탑승후기 알려드리겠습니다. 칭다오 항공권 산동항공으로 다녀온 후기 20.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.