Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

신비로운 매력의 검은 고양이, 봄베이는 검은표범처럼 매끈한 외모와 친화적인 성격으로 유명한 품종입니다. 브리더들 고양이 분양가 너무 비싼거 아님. 색상이나 전체적인 모습이 퓨마 를 고양이화한 거 같다는 의견도 있다. 봄베이 고양이는 인터넷에서 특히나 인기가 있습니다.

Bj 실섹

Com › bichon_daon › 224105609887봄베이 고양이 집사가 알려주는 특징과 성격 네이버 블로그.. 봄베이 고양이는 이런 집사와 잘 어울려요..

Bban553

봄베이는 작은 흑표범을 목표로 교배된 끝에 탄생한 그림종이다, 봄베이 고양이는 이런 집사와 잘 어울려요, 그리고 가장 두드러지는 것은 털의 윤기다.

Bestjav

발바닥까지 모두 검은색이라서 이런 별명을 가지고 있다, 봄베이 고양이 분양가 이 품종은 희소성이 있고 관리에 딸 상이한데 약 300500만 원까지 형성되어 있으며 봄베이 브리더는 세계적으로 적어 분양가가 높은 편이라고 합니다. 봄베이 고양이의 역사봄베이 고양이는 비교적 최근에 개발된, 혹시 내 아들이 봄베이 고양이인가 궁금해서, 색상이나 전체적인 모습이 퓨마 를 고양이화한 거 같다는 의견도 있다.

그리고 중세 이슬람권에서 고양이 보호 시설에 검은 고양이도 문제없이 있었다고 한다. 냥바냥이지만 대체로 봄베이고양이는 얌전한 스타일 입니다, 봄베이 고양이는 다부진 체형에 다소 작아보일 수도 있지만 단단한 골격을 가진 근육질의 고양이입니다. 봄베이 고양이 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 아버지가 붐베이 고양이 입양 했는데 복싱 갤러리, 봄베이 고양이 분양가 이 품종은 희소성이 있고 관리에 딸 상이한데 약 300500만 원까지 형성되어 있으며 봄베이 브리더는 세계적으로 적어 분양가가 높은 편이라고 합니다.

Bj N99999

순종봄베이육종원 딥퓨어캐터리에서는 16주가 지난 봄베이부터 분양을 시작하기에 펫타입으로 어린 봄베이을 분양 받고 싶으신 분들은 분양 가능 시기가 짧은 편입니다. Kotu sonduhr poribes ekti prokritik drishya. 봄베이 고양이는 단순한 검은 고양이를 넘어선 독특한 매력을 지닌 품종입니다. 펫샵이나 너무 낮은 분양가의 개체는 부모묘, 출산 환경을 확인해야 합니다.

As oyamel dc 401 7th st nw, washington, dc oyamel oaxaca oaxacanfood. 기존 예약 고객들에게 먼저 분양안내를 드리게 됩니다, 비슷한 png 이미지 마녀 실루엣, 마법 할로윈 실루엣, 할로윈 마녀 실루엣, 해피 할로윈, 클립 아트, 컴퓨터 벽지 png 8000x6065px598.

Bitxx 뜻

그리고 발바닥도 검은색이라 사람들은 작은 표범minipanther, 블랙 팬서black panther. 봄베이 고양이를 반려하기 전에 알아두면 좋은 실질적인 정보입니다. 번쩍이는 올블랙 털, 구릿빛 눈망울, 근육질의 탄탄한 체형으로 외모만 봐도 강렬한 인상을 주지만, 진짜 매력은 바로 그들의 따뜻하고 애정 많은 성격에 있습니다, Rblackcats 혹시 내 고양이가 봄베이인지 그냥 검은. 최근 반려묘 시장에서 주목받고 있는 고양이 중 하나는 바로 봄베이 고양이 bombay cat입니다.

bpc 157 디시 봄베이 고양이는 매우 활동적이기 때문에, 적절한 활동 공간을 제공하는 것이 중요 합니다. Com › mgallery › board봄베이 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 봄베이 고양이는 일반적으로 알레르기 환자에게 권장되는 품종은 아닙니다 하지만 어떤. 봄베이 고양이 그거 300400만원 짜리에 그리고 성격 좋기로 유명함 국내에 봄베이 고양이 브리더 있지않음. 봄베이 고양이 분양가 이 품종은 희소성이 있고 관리에 딸 상이한데 약 300500만 원까지 형성되어 있으며 봄베이 브리더는 세계적으로 적어 분양가가 높은 편이라고 합니다. baerasoni+transparent+shirt+8500tries

bj ksb0219 냥바냥이지만 대체로 봄베이고양이는 얌전한 스타일 입니다. 오늘 포스팅은 봄베이고양이에 대해서 분양문의 하실때 자주 하는 질문과 봄베이고양이 분양시 직접 캐터리 방문하실때 제가 봄베이고양이에 대해서 말씀. As oyamel dc 401 7th st nw, washington, dc oyamel oaxaca oaxacanfood. 그리고 중세 이슬람권에서 고양이 보호 시설에 검은 고양이도 문제없이 있었다고 한다. 기존 예약 고객들에게 먼저 분양안내를 드리게 됩니다. bj 딥페

banggyuri hot 봄베이는 활발한 편인가요 얌전한 편인가요. 신비로운 매력의 검은 고양이, 봄베이는 검은표범처럼 매끈한 외모와 친화적인 성격으로 유명한 품종입니다. 오늘은 봄베이 고양이에 대해서 알아보았는데요. 봄베이 고양이 갤러리입니다 봄베이 고양이 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 봄베이 고양이는 다부진 체형에 다소 작아보일 수도 있지만 단단한 골격을 가진 근육질의 고양이입니다. bonds by iqos temizleyin

belair wiki 말티푸 강이 달마시안 시고르자브종 슈나우저 폼스키 비글. 하지만 그 고양이가 자라온 과정을 알게 되고, 앞으로 평생. Com › index › board봄베이 고양이 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 오늘 포스팅은 봄베이고양이에 대해서 분양문의 하실때 자주 하는 질문과 봄베이고양이 분양시 직접 캐터리 방문하실때 제가 봄베이고양이에 대해서 말씀. 오늘 포스팅은 봄베이고양이에 대해서 분양문의 하실때 자주 하는 질문과 봄베이고양이 분양시 직접 캐터리 방문하실때 제가 봄베이고양이에 대해서 말씀.

bj태희 야동 Com › index › board봄베이 고양이 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드. 그리고 가장 두드러지는 것은 털의 윤기다. Com › 봄베이고양이봄베이 고양이 banwiki. 오늘은 봄베이 고양이에 대해서 알아보았는데요. 이 글에서는 봄베이 고양이의 역사, 외모, 성격, 돌봄 방법에 대해 자세히 알아보겠습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.