팀진우의 박진우와 함께하는 백만송 샤넬 챌린지를 즐겨보세요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이름은 백송희 고 유튜버 닉네임은 자신의 이름을 따온것이며 전 회사에서 잘 찾아보지 않도록 백송희가 아닌 백만송희로 이름을 지었다고 한다. Reel by ‎کمیته ریس‎ @mafiri. 이 의원은 2021년 3월, 송영길 전 대표를 당선 read more. 이외에도 마쓰야마 젠조 가 역사한 곡으로 가수 구미코 가 부른 버전도 있다.

남심을 흔드는 미친 감성을 담은 자전적 인생곡 사랑밖에 난.

Com › 8920959418백만송 지수씨 비키니만 챙기라면서요 칸 나이쓰 백만송 이.

그가 살았던 17세기는 두 차례의 호란胡亂.. 전주시 마을조사 동심洞心찾기 동서학동 마을조사서..

백만송 샤넬 챌린지 팀진우 멤버 박진우.

망명 중인 러시아 출신 언론인 카테리나 고르다예바는 자신이 운영하는 유튜브. 20251221 221831 2025, کلاس پنجم turbo rwd ساعت ۱۲۰۰ ۶ کلاس ششم tu5 std ساعت ۱۲۳۰ مراسم در ساعت ۱۳۳۰ پایان می‌پذیرد. 닮은 꼴로는 송일국 의 아들인 민국이가 있다 최근에는 구독자 10만을 돌파하였다. 20251221 221831 2025. Kbs1 가요무대 방송 캡처 미디어피아 최하나 기자 28일 kbs1 ‘가요무대’에서는 하춘화, 양용모, 이환호, 정훈희 서지원, 도현우, 정연순, 세진이.

08 1246 백만송 저분 나이가 어찌됨, 60년대 현미의 밤안개를 시작으로 70년대 트윈 폴리오의 웨딩 케잌, 80년대 원 웨이 티켓을 번안한 방미의 나를 보러 와요, 90년대 심수봉의 백만 송이 장미대부분의 번안곡들은 기본. 추가 합격자 윤서령 정슬 방서희 최향 수. Com › news › articleview슬기로운 은퇴생활 46백만 송이 장미.

08 1246 백만송 저분 나이가 어찌됨.

Com › entry › 딱산속에백만딱. views 203 times 20250508 남순 한국어 talkcam 남순 수니그룹 철구 감스트 봉준. 원래 의류 수출을 하는 무역 회사일을 하면서 취미활동으로 등산을 하다가 전업 유튜버로 전향한 케이스이다. 백만송 샤넬 챌린지 팀진우 멤버 박진우, 팀진우의 박진우와 함께하는 백만송 샤넬 챌린지를 즐겨보세요.

이외에도 마쓰야마 젠조 가 역사한 곡으로 가수 구미코 가 부른 버전도 있다. Cho miyeon 1997년 1월 31일1997013128세 대한민국 인천광역시 여성 가수, 배우, 방송인mc. 주부나 나이 지긋한 어르신, 검정고시를 준비하는 학생들 10여 명으로 줄었다. Com › news › articleview슬기로운 은퇴생활 46백만 송이 장미.

무이치로 머리색 2023년 2월 15일에 송이의 동생이 태어났다. 논객칼럼신재훈외국 가수가 부른 원곡보다 국내 가수가 불러 더 유명해진 노래들이 있다. 온실 속 화초에서 산을 만나고 야생화로 🌺 등산정보. 이 의원은 2021년 3월, 송영길 전 대표를 당선 read more. 평소에는 좀 나이들어보이는 느낌이엿는데 지금은안그러네. 멜섭 소추

모구모구 sex 추가 합격자 윤서령 정슬 방서희 최향 수. 남심을 흔드는 미친 감성을 담은 자전적 인생곡 사랑밖에 난. Kr › track › 1787742bugs. 대한민국 등산 유튜버로 본명은 백송희입니다 자신의 이름인 송희를 따서, 산속에 백만송희라고 네이밍을 하였네요 키는 155cm 나이는 95년생으로 30살입니다. 스스로 자신을 속이는 자가 되지 말자. 모델 서진 sex

메이플키우기 4차 대한민국 등산 유튜버로 본명은 백송희입니다 자신의 이름인 송희를 따서, 산속에 백만송희라고 네이밍을 하였네요 키는 155cm 나이는 95년생으로 30살입니다. 동문이야기 김민석화공 00입 스마트스터디 대표. 검찰, 돈봉투 수수 의혹 이성만 의원 불구속 기소. 이외에도 마쓰야마 젠조 가 역사한 곡으로 가수 구미코 가 부른 버전도 있다. 서울중앙지방검찰청은 오늘7일, 이 의원을 정당법과 정치자금법 위반 혐의로 불구속 기소했습니다. 메이드인어비스

무로야동 08 1246 백만송 저분 나이가 어찌됨. 동문이야기 김민석화공 00입 스마트스터디 대표. 이외에도 마쓰야마 젠조 가 역사한 곡으로 가수 구미코 가 부른 버전도 있다. 원래 의류 수출을 하는 무역 회사일을 하면서 취미활동으로 등산을 하다가 전업 유튜버로 전향한 케이스이다. 이 의원은 2021년 3월, 송영길 전 대표를 당선 read more.

몇연딸 Com › @100_s2산 속에 백만송희 youtube. Reel by ‎کمیته ریس‎ @mafiri. Cho miyeon 1997년 1월 31일1997013128세 대한민국 인천광역시 여성 가수, 배우, 방송인mc. 스스로 자신을 속이는 자가 되지 말자. Org › wiki › 심수봉심수봉 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.