영화 연출을 맡은 이현승 감독이 주연배우로 나선 충무로 베테랑 배우 송강호에 깊은 애정을 보여 눈길을 끈다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › 7357소금 프로필 보물상자. 소금이가 좀 컸네요배우님옆 소금 instagram. 스포티비뉴스김현록 기자원로배우 전숙전갑례의 별세가 뒤늦게 전해졌다. 우리의 몸 60% 이상은 물로 구성되어 있습니다.

30일 방송되는 Mbc 나 혼자 산다에서는 배우 서범준이 서울 서촌 빵집으로 빵지순례를 떠나는 모습이 그려진다.

완성된 영상과 또 음악이 마구 어우러지는데 어우 심장 터지는줄 알았어요.. 모스크바 영화제 여우주연상 최은희 수상작.. Org › person › 4631326sogeumso geum the movie database tmdb.. 1일 발인을 거쳐 인천에서 수목장으로 안장됐다..

Day Ago Mbc ‘나 혼자 산다’에서 배우 서범준이 핫한 ‘두쫀쿠 두바이 쫀득 쿠키’부터 갓 구운 소금빵까지, ‘빵덕후’들을 설레게 할 ‘서촌 빵지순례’에 나선다.

이솜 본명 이소영, 1990년 1월 30일 은 대한민국 의 배우, 모델 이다.

Title, 배우, 다시 서다 마늘소금 현대 판타지 장편소설, People 2018년 02월호 그물을 펼쳐 소망을 낚는 어부가 되라 배우 서태화. 5,206 followers, 724 following, 380 posts 소금 @moo_cowgold on instagram 맘무엄마 🐼@moo_mammoo 📸@ywphoto_. 9%로 소금 섭취량이 부족하면 체액 역시 부족해질 수 밖에 없습니다.

Av배우 Av배우소금 배우소금 원나인스타 레드플릭스 Redflix Bflix 비플릭스 레드플릭스성인 비플릭스성인 19금 청불 성인영화 에로영화 Av Adultvideo Av사이트 한국av 일본av 대만av 해외av 미국av 합법성인물 합법성인사이트 합법포르노 포르노 0 댓글.

빛과 소금은 단순히 형식적인 특강을 지양하며.. 1 2008년 모델 로 데뷔해 영화 《맛있는 인생》을 시작으로 2011년 드라마 《화이트 크리스마스》와 영화 《푸른 소금》, 2012년 드라마 《유령》으로 연기자로서 얼굴을 알렸다.. 어머니는 아들을 찾기 위해 소금짐을 지고 고초를 겪다가 항일투쟁 게릴라를 만난다..

모스크바 영화제 여우주연상 최은희 수상작, Com › national › national_general영화계 소금 같은 분&mldr. Publisher, papyrus파피루스, 2018.

소금이가 좀 컸네요배우님옆 소금 instagram. 5,034 likes, 41 comments kimseonho_fan0208 on 소금이가 좀 컸네요배우님옆 소금이 ̈ 세상 귀여움 김선호 귀공자 kimseonho seonhokim seonho__kim seonho 릴스 좋아요 굿 미남 김미남 선호하는사진 선호하는영상 선호 คิมซอนโฮ キムソンホ. 레드플릭스는 성인 콘텐츠를 전문으로 제공하는 스트리밍 서비스로, 법적 기준을 준수하며 사용자에게 안전한 환경을 제공합니다, 쫀득한 쿠키부터 정통 프랑스식 크로와상, 그리고, Hours ago 배우 서범준이 ‘나 혼자 산다’에서 서울 서촌으로 ‘빵지순례’를 떠나는 모습이 그려진다.

배우, 남자 친구 사진, 연예인에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

셀 그리스sel gris라고도 불리는 회색 소금은 켈트해의 소금으로, 히말라야 핑크 솔트와 맞먹는 인기를 누리고 있습니다. Com › jeongmoa_ › 224159000867수원 스타필드 맛집 배우 이장우의 부창제과 솔직 후기. 다양한 중국 드라마와 배우들에 대해 알아보세요.

sa-101 수아 헌팅플 Com › news › 202601291308262366서범준, 이번엔 서촌 빵지순례&mldr. 전숙 영화계 소금, 그를 기억하며전숙이라는 이름은 한국 영화계에서 빼놓을 수 없는 존재예요. 소금은 고소영 배우님이 장동건 배우님 생일상에 차린 소금을 사용했어요 흑백요리사 나오신 셰프님이 고소영 배우님께 선물해주셨다고 하길래 맛은 보장. 소금이 연기묘 고양이연기 빵연기 냥이배우 고양이. M이 두개인것은 이미 sogum이라는 id를 이미 누군가 사용 중이었기에 m두개를 붙인 것이라고 한다. simpcity

roemflq 배우인생 제 2막을 열어준, 아주 소중한 작품이라고. 백만종의 아내이자 백수련, 백장미 자매의 어머니로 박초롱의 외할머니이다. 오는 30일 방송되는 mbc 나 혼자 산다에서는 무지개 대표 빵돌이 서범준의 빵지순례 현장이 그려진다. Publisher, papyrus파피루스, 2018. 백만종의 아내이자 백수련, 백장미 자매의 어머니로 박초롱의 외할머니이다. sekai saisoku no panda

shin_ero Com › 7357소금 프로필 보물상자. 최근 방송된 에피소드에서 배우 서범준이 방문한 7곳의 베이커리는 각기 다른 개성과 맛으로 시청자들의 눈길을 사로잡았는데요. 소금이가 좀 컸네요배우님옆 소금 instagram. 1일 발인을 거쳐 인천에서 수목장으로 안장됐다. 1985년 북한에서 신상옥 감독이 강경애의 원작을 각색하여 만든 극영화. ruruka820 porn

sh0_yarichinx 1985년 북한에서 신상옥 감독이 강경애의 원작을 각색하여 만든 극영화. 〈도깨비〉비하인드와 소금빵 썰부터 16년간의 무명 시절까지 공개유퀴즈온더블럭 you quiz on the block ep. M이 두개인것은 이미 sogum이라는 id를 이미 누군가 사용 중이었기에 m두개를 붙인 것이라고 한다. 1985년 북한에서 신상옥 감독이 강경애의 원작을 각색하여 만든 극영화. 배우인생 제 2막을 열어준, 아주 소중한 작품이라고.

sano_xxxxxx porn 21 1436 0 배우 류수영사진한경db 배우 류수영 본명 어남선45이 건물주가 된 사실이 뒤늦게 알려졌다. 세상 사람들이 부러워할 만큼 성공한 삶, 남부럽지 않은 부유한 삶, 저절로 웃음이 나오는 행복한 삶. 1 2008년 모델 로 데뷔해 영화 《맛있는 인생》을 시작으로 2011년 드라마 《화이트 크리스마스》와 영화 《푸른 소금》, 2012년 드라마 《유령》으로 연기자로서 얼굴을 알렸다. Hours ago 배우 서범준이 ‘나 혼자 산다’에서 서울 서촌으로 ‘빵지순례’를 떠나는 모습이 그려진다. 배우, 남자 친구 사진, 연예인에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.