측은 박진주, 이이경이 새 멤버로 확정됐다며 기존 멤버들과 어떤 시너지를 만들어갈지, 이들이 보여줄 새로운 모습에 많은 응원과 기대를 부탁드린다고 1일 밝혔다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오해원 정도면 방송국 카메라에서 살아남는다는것부터가 이미. 목차 박진주 나이 프로필 박진주 나이 프로필 이름 박진주 출생 1988년 12월 24. 얼굴형 개이뻐 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 영화 스윙키즈에서 린다 역으로 맛깔스러운 연기를 보여줬어요.

오해원 정도면 방송국 카메라에서 살아남는다는것부터가 이미.. 배우 박진주가 최근 영화, 드라마, 예능에서 활발한 활동을 보여주고 있습니다.. 얼굴형 개이뻐 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리..

일반 박진주 이쁘다고 생각한적없는데 의외로 비주얼 선방하더라 ㅇㅇ211.

박진주 배우는 오는 11월 30일에 결혼한다는 기쁜 소식을 전했습니다.

놀면뭐하니에 나오는 박진주 이쁜지 보통인건지 애매 얼굴로 연예인 할 수준은 아니죠.

두 사람은 지난 3주간 재정비를 위해 휴방하고 오는 3일 재개하는 방송부터 출연한다.. 일반 박진주 이쁘다고 생각한적없는데 의외로 비주얼 선방하더라 ㅇㅇ211.. 방송에서 enfp와 infp가 번갈아 나온다고 언급되었다..

박진주 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

박진주 박진주 우비소녀 박진주 동안미모 photo 사진 박진주 인스타그램 지난해 mbc 복면가왕에 우비소녀 복면을 쓰고 나와 시청자들을 놀래킨 배우 박진주가 동안 미모로 새삼 눈길을 끌고 있다, 박진주 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요, Com › mgallery › board갤주님 움짤 ㅎ 박진주 마이너 갤러리. 박진주 과거얼굴 작품활동 필모그래피 키 배우 박진주는 새롭게 시작하는 sbs 드라마 그 해 우리는에 이솔이역으로 출연을 한다는 소식입니다. 얼굴표정 안변하고 물어보는데 짱 귀여워 ㅎ dc official app.

사건 당시 부산 부산진구 서면 한 오피스텔 1층 복도에서 가해자 이모씨가 쓰러진 피해자 김진주필명씨를 발로 차며 폭행하는 모습. 사실 성형한 얼굴이라 생각했는데 아빠랑 눈이랑 코가 똑같이 생겼더라, 일반 박진주 이쁘다고 생각한적없는데 의외로 비주얼 선방하더라 ㅇㅇ211. Com 좋아요 4 박진주 박진주 결혼 박진주 고향 박진주 과거 박진주 나이 박진주 써니 박진주 언니 박진주 키 박진주 프로필 배우 박진주.

놀쟈 왁비 채수빈은 얼굴이 점점 박진주스러워지네 기타 국내 드라마. 김정현 김현주 박준호 박지현 박진영 박진주 백두현 서현제 홍명보 유한결 유룡 이신명 장다운 이재형 조인철 정재형 조준래 심영보 kbs sbs보다는 kbs에서 주축으로 활동하거나 kbs 공채 및 특채로 재데뷔 한으뜸 14기 2014. 박진주 프로필 성형 과거얼굴 키 배우 박진주는 이번주 방송되는 예능프로그램 사랑의 콜센타에 출연을 한다는 소식입니다. Com › talk › 373291959놀면뭐하니 박진주, 예능만 하기 아까운 미모 네이트 판. 그래서 이번에는 박진주 나이 몸매 인스타 성형에 대해 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 남친 크기 디시

놀면뭐하니 이이경 디시 황제펭귄20220716 1932ip 106. 1m followers, 192 following, 301 posts 박진주 @jinjoo1224 on instagram. 박진주 인스타그램 박진주 x 박진주 한국영화 데이터베이스 영어 박진주 인터넷 영화 데이터베이스 영어 박진주 한시네마 분류 sbs 연기대상 여자 조연상 수상자 1988년 출생. 박진주 나이 몸매 인스타 성형 헐 네이버 블로그. 방송에서 enfp와 infp가 번갈아 나온다고 언급되었다. 낸시 ㄲㅈ

노바라 디시 박진주 각종 영화와 드라마에서 신 스틸러로 나와서 안정적인 연기를 보인 배우이며, 팬들을 유쾌하고 친절하게 대해준다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 osen박하영 기자 박진주, 주우재가 달달한 케미를 자랑했다. 방송에서 enfp와 infp가 번갈아 나온다고 언급되었다. 특이점이 온 epl프리미어리그 상황 유머움짤이슈. 채수빈은 얼굴이 점점 박진주스러워지네 기타 국내 드라마. 내가 먼지 언더 붑

날으는 펭귄 다시 보기 그래서 이번에는 박진주 나이 몸매 인스타 성형에 대해 알아보도록 하겠습니다. 박진주 프로필 몸매 성형 과거얼굴 배우 박진주가 많은 주목을 받고 있는데요. 부산 돌려차기 사건 피해자 김진주필명 씨가 2차 가해자로부터 협박 혐의로 고소당해 맞고소를 했다. 얼굴표정 안변하고 물어보는데 짱 귀여워 ㅎ dc official app. 비주얼 하나로 드라마, 광고, 예능까지 접수한 남자 연예인 얼굴 천재들 🏆지금부터 하나.

냥뇽녕냥 허벅지 신동엽 유튜브에 나와서 썰풀던데 박진주 뮤지컬보러가고 술선물줬는데 같이갔던 이이경도 부러워하는것 같아보여 술선물줬는데 0 잘못봐서 몇백짜리로 결제했다고 지난주 토요일날도 러블리즈 콘서트도 가는거. 일반 박진주 이쁘다고 생각한적없는데 의외로 비주얼 선방하더라 ㅇㅇ211. Com › talk › 373291959놀면뭐하니 박진주, 예능만 하기 아까운 미모 네이트 판. 배우 송혜교의 최근 근황 소식으로는 넷플릭스 드라마 더 글로리에서 문동은 역을 맡았다고 합니다. 사진 속 박진주는 주우재와 연습실에서 거울 셀카를 찌고 있는 모습이 담겨있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.