Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Name미즈모토 유우나,yuuna mizumoto,水元ゆうなbirthdate19830831height157weightmeasurementsb88w59h86. Pbd037 미즈모토 유나 프리미엄 best 4시간 missav. 이 리스트 중에 top 3를 골라 보면, 나오, 미즈모토 유우나, 미카미 유아 이렇게 3명입니다. Beb025 츠보미, 메구미 케이, 미즈모토 유우나, 타카미야 료, 모모카 에미리 sdde623 아오이 레나, 아베 미카코, 카토 모모카, 카미카와 소라, 미소노 와카 dbeb102 아오이 유리카, 나츠키 마리나, 아카리 토모카, 니노미야 와카, 카와나 미스즈, 마키 쿄코.

게이 애널 트위터

게이 딥페이크

Kr › service › videoremu022 미즈모토 유우나, 水元ゆうな, yuuna mizumoto 하야사카, 미즈모토 유우나, 최근 품번rebjk006 2024년 05월 17일 출시 대표장르3p4p, 유부녀, 카우걸여성상위, 구속, 물총, 숙녀, 왕가슴, 코스프레 총 작품수437. 심지어 남편과 친하게 지내고 싶은 마음에 열성을 다하는 아유미가 read more.

걸레 히토미

미즈모토 유우나 42세 도쿄 출신 av배우.. 미즈모토 유우나 yuuna mizumoto 품번.. Atkd161 the best of 미즈모토 유우나 2 missav.. Name水元ゆうな,yuuna mizumoto,미즈모토 유우나birthdate19830831birthplace東京都height157weightblood typeameasurementsb88w59h86..

몸의 젠부에서 느끼는 온나, 미즈모토 유나의 최고급 프리미엄 베스트, Worst 44% 라멘걸토마코 역 감독배우 시로테 히데오 히로타 미키오 오쿠 아유부 신자토 타케루 쿠로사와 아이 미즈모토 유나 와카나 히카루 아마이 미츠 아사미, 4시간 누레누레 여교사편 14448 sspd064 유전자의 비극 3 미즈모토 유나 40248. 인형같은av배우 유나 미즈모토 yuna mizumoto 저 얼굴에 박힌 점하나가 묘한 매력을 주는군하 유모배우인줄 알았더니 위와 같은 노모작품도 있. 심지어 남편과 친하게 지내고 싶은 마음에 열성을 다하는 아유미가 read more. 미즈모토 유우나 20015 wss165 츤 얼굴로 이키가만하는 온나 교사 미즈모토 유우나 궁극의 쿠빌레 육체 35924 bib026 궁극의 쿠빌레 육체 the av world.

게이 Tumbex

사키 노노카 아리사카 미유키 야시키 레나 호시 아메리 관련장르 굴욕 대학생 아마추어 앵커 전기 마사지 유출 pla012 미즈모토 유우나 yuuna mizumoto, 水元ゆうな 본능을 드러낸 생질내사정 섹스 댓글 +12 조회 10, 남편은 아유미에게 살가워 보이지 않는다, 가장 먼저 좋아요를 누르세요가장 먼저 좋아요를 누르세요, 몸의 젠부에서 느끼는 온나, 미즈모토 유나의 최고급 프리미엄 베스트.

Worst 44% 라멘걸토마코 역 감독배우 시로테 히데오 히로타 미키오 오쿠 아유부 신자토 타케루 쿠로사와 아이 미즈모토 유나 와카나 히카루 아마이 미츠 아사미, 미즈모토 유우나 42세 도쿄 출신 av배우. Hfd190사사키 아키,세리자와 렌,미즈모토 유우나,키리오카 사츠키,키사키 유아,호시노 아카리,시호,유키 미사 hd. 일본 출신 av배우 미즈모토 유우나 水元ゆうな 1983년생, 42세. 욕정의 기모노 정사 2014 주연 영화 포스터. Av계의 청순 아이콘으로 불리는 미즈모토 유나의 화끈하게 주는 젊은 애인의 국내 개봉 중이다.

하녀방의 특별서비스 2012 주연 영화 포스터. 하녀방의 특별서비스 2012 주연 영화 포스터. 청순 아이콘 미즈모토 유나 19금 화끈하게 주는 젊은 애인. 청순 아이콘 미즈모토 유나 19금 화끈하게 주는 젊은 애인.

게이 들이 좋아 하는 얼굴 디시 장르 하마양풍속양, 단체작품, 물총, 3p・4p. 인형같은av배우 유나 미즈모토 yuna mizumoto 블로그. Beb025 츠보미, 메구미 케이, 미즈모토 유우나, 타카미야 료, 모모카 에미리 bwb003 에리카, 안주 dakh002 키타가와 리코 damz001 하마사키 마오 darg003 오노데라 리사 dbeb102 아오이 유리카, 나츠키 마리나, 아카리 토모카, 니노미야 와카, 카와나 미스즈, 마키. Pbd037 미즈모토 유나 프리미엄 best 4시간 missav. 미즈모토 유우나 20015 wss165 츤 얼굴로 이키가만하는 온나 교사 미즈모토 유우나 궁극의 쿠빌레 육체 35924 bib026 궁극의 쿠빌레 육체 the av world. 개빡친 유하 아헤가오

게이지옥 무료보기 미즈모토 유우나 水元ゆうなyuuna mizumoto 생년월일 1983년 8월31일 출신지 도쿄도 혈액형 a형 신장 157cm 쓰리사이즈 b88 e컵 w59 h86 2003년 5월 maxa와 앨리스japan에서 데뷔. 청순 아이콘 미즈모토 유나 19금 화끈하게 주는 젊은 애인. 인간의 양면성과 숨겨진 욕망을 적나라하게 보여주는 화끈하게 주는 젊은 애인이 국내 개봉한다. Pbd037 미즈모토 유나 프리미엄 best 4시간 missav. 미즈모토 유우나水元ゆうな42세은는 2003년 첫 작품을 발표한 일본 av 배우로, 도쿄 출신입니다. 검열 없는 ai 합성 디시

거누 파파 대기업 디시 Com 무료 jav 온라인 시청 미즈모토 유우나 av 온라인. Mxsps047 미즈모토 유우나 the best missav. 미즈모토 유우나 水元ゆうなyuuna mizumoto 생년월일 1983년 8월31일 출신지 도쿄도 혈액형 a형 신장 157cm 쓰리사이즈 b88 e컵 w59 h86 2003년 5월 maxa와 앨리스japan에서 데뷔. 어릴 적부터 플루트를 불어서 음감이 뛰어나다. 여자 스파이에서 姐 씨 역까지 볼거리 가득 5 타이틀 분 농축 수록. 결디 후기

강인경 ㅂㅈ 노출 Yuna mizumoto av 온라인 보기 missav. 미즈모토 유우나 yuuna mizumoto 19830831 44 157 cm b88w59h86 cm. 미즈모토 유우나 水元ゆうなyuuna mizumoto 생년월일 1983년 8월31일 출신지 도쿄도 혈액형. Atkd161 the best of 미즈모토 유우나 2 missav. 하녀방의 특별서비스 2012 주연 영화 포스터.

갱생르서 대학 4시간 누레누레 여교사편 14448 sspd064 유전자의 비극 3 미즈모토 유나 40248. 미즈모토 유우나水元ゆうな42세은는 2003년 첫 작품을 발표한 일본 av 배우로, 도쿄 출신입니다. 미즈모토 유우나 yuuna mizumoto 19830831 44 157 cm b88w59h86 cm. Net › actress › 7272미즈모토 유우나미즈모토 유우나의 최신작 & 프로필 mizumoto yuuna, 水元ゆうな. 인형같은av배우 유나 미즈모토 yuna mizumoto 블로그.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.