Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가족, 연인, 친구 모두가 함께 관람할 수 있는마음 따뜻하고 신나는 삼거리슈퍼로 초대합니다. 문화포털 페이지가 없거나 잘못된 경로 입니다. Days ago 699 likes, 9 comments library_theatre on janu 퐆퐑퐀퐃퐔퐀퐓퐄 새로운 바다를 찾아 떠나는 졸업생 분들을 위한 특별한 선물 여러분의 졸업을 축하드립니다 拾 올겨울, 가장 따뜻한 연대와 희망의 이야기 뮤지컬이 새로운 시작을 준비하는 여러분을 위해 특별한 졸업 응원 캠페인을. 11 likes, 1 comments suhee.

Javrank 버스

Jaega_jay

연극 초대 이벤트 키워드는 ‘깔끔한 관람’.. Sns와 온라인 채널 활용 뮤지컬 초대 이벤트 참여하기 🔍 핵심 포인트 2025년 뮤지컬 무료 초대권을 얻는 가장 활발하고 접근성이 높은 방법은 인스타그램, 네이버 블로그포스트 등 sns 및 온라인 커뮤니티 이벤트를 활용하는 것입니다.. 대학로에서 공연 중인 테이크 오프 초대 이벤트를 시작합니다..

Ipcam Kissjav

Jav X

해당 이벤트 댓글에 초대 일정을 골라 관람하고 싶은 이유 적으면. 뮤지컬 빈센트 반고흐 공연에 고객 20명을 초대합니다, Comanswersmj8b10reserved 이벤트 안내 관람 일자.

이용에 불편을 드려 대단히 죄송합니다.. 응모하기를 클릭하지 않으신 경우, 이벤트 당첨 대상에서 제외됩니다..

Iwara 서버

Days ago 699 likes, 9 comments library_theatre on janu 퐆퐑퐀퐃퐔퐀퐓퐄 새로운 바다를 찾아 떠나는 졸업생 분들을 위한 특별한 선물 여러분의 졸업을 축하드립니다 拾 올겨울, 가장 따뜻한 연대와 희망의 이야기 뮤지컬이 새로운 시작을 준비하는 여러분을 위해 특별한 졸업 응원 캠페인을. 🎭 지금 올콘 인스타그램에서 바로 참여해 보세요, 추첨을 통해 뮤지컬 초대권1인 2매 을 드립니다. 31 좌석우위 3 뮤지컬 드라큘라 dracula：the. 이벤트 진행기간 1024목 1029화 1700발표일 1029화. 신나는 모험이 기다리는 시원한 바다 100층짜리 집으로 떠나는 배에 승선하라.

추첨을 통해 뮤지컬 초대권1인 2매 을 드립니다. 추첨을 통해 뮤지컬 공연에 초대합니다. On the travelling road에서 다양한 오디션 정보를 제공하며, 플랫폼으로서의 역할을 수행합니다, 뮤지컬 빈센트 반고흐 공연에 고객 20명을 초대합니다. 가족, 연인, 친구 모두가 함께 관람할 수 있는마음 따뜻하고 신나는 삼거리슈퍼로 초대합니다, @__, 9월 25일에 매머드커피 마시고, 옥주현 나오는 마리.

iqos 3 multi 충전 방법 한국뮤지컬협회입니다 한국뮤지컬협회 공식 인스타그램 올ㅋ공연 좀 보는데. 초대 티켓은 당첨 회원 본인만 수령 가능하며, 양도 불가합니다. Sns와 온라인 채널 활용 뮤지컬 초대 이벤트 참여하기 🔍 핵심 포인트 2025년 뮤지컬 무료 초대권을 얻는 가장 활발하고 접근성이 높은 방법은 인스타그램, 네이버 블로그포스트 등 sns 및 온라인 커뮤니티 이벤트를 활용하는 것입니다. Com › artause › 223813927685무료 관람 기회 창작뮤지컬 초대권 이벤트 총 7. The musical ㅡ 2026년 2월 12일 목 1930 s석 초대권 3명 1인 2매. iqos iluma i one reset

japanese asmr archive Days ago 699 likes, 9 comments library_theatre on janu 퐆퐑퐀퐃퐔퐀퐓퐄 새로운 바다를 찾아 떠나는 졸업생 분들을 위한 특별한 선물 여러분의 졸업을 축하드립니다 拾 올겨울, 가장 따뜻한 연대와 희망의 이야기 뮤지컬이 새로운 시작을 준비하는 여러분을 위해 특별한 졸업 응원 캠페인을. 한국뮤지컬협회입니다 한국뮤지컬협회 공식 인스타그램 올ㅋ공연 좀 보는데. 국내 최대 25,000평 대규모 세트장에서 즐기는 리얼 공포체험. 오늘은 뮤지컬 초대이벤트 소식으로 인사드립니다. 간단한 팔로우와 댓글 미션, 구글폼만 작성하면, 배우들의. jh-101 xx

jav 예고편 뮤지컬 관람후기 초대 이벤트 2026. 문화포털 누리집 문화알리미 문화이벤트 ※ 당첨자 발표 2024. 어린이 뮤지컬 초대이벤트 참여 기간 2022. 초대를 받았을 땐 솔직히 큰 기대 없이. 유의사항 공연 시작 1시간 전부터 매표소에서 이름 및. imogenlucie

javtrailers.c 뮤지컬 테이크 오프 초대 이벤트 대학로 뮤지컬. 응모형태 댓글응모 주요경품 공연티켓뮤지컬 응모마감 0201 0206 경품내역 r석 티켓10명 아시아나항공 저장 보관 열람. Com › kcis_ › 223481864171초대이벤트 뮤지컬, 바다 100층짜리 집 627까지 네이버 블로. 뮤지컬 한국 초연 퐓퐇퐄 퐇퐈퐓 퐁퐑퐎퐀퐃퐖퐀퐘 퐌퐔퐒퐈퐂퐀퐋 제 10회 한국뮤지컬어워즈 신인상 여자 부문 이성경 배우의 수상을 축하합니다 뮤지컬 알라딘 뮤지컬알라딘 musicalaladdin. 코너에서 진행한 뮤지컬 초대이벤트 당첨자를 발표합니다.

javrank 일녀 해당 이벤트 댓글에 초대 일정을 골라 ‘관람하고 싶은 이유’ 적으면 참여 완료. 본 제품은 회원전용 제품으로 회원만 구매가능합니다. 응모하기를 클릭하지 않으신 경우, 이벤트 당첨 대상에서 제외됩니다. 문화초대이벤트 연극 죽어야 사는 남자. 이벤트 기간 2021100120211019.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.