Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

3,814 followers, 1,519 following, 711 posts 거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 💛 @onldo_pilates_ on instagram ️11 개인레슨 ️21듀엣레슨 ️41그룹레슨 ️임산부필라테스 ️국가공인 생활스포츠 & 노인& 유소년 지도사 ️운동처방사 1급 ️스포츠영양학, 대한인명구조협회 응급처치 수료 거제필라테스. Vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림 vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림. Vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림. 황아영 최고의 필라테스 강사와 함께 다양한 요가팁과 운동루틴을 경험해 보세요.

Pako_dai

Vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림 vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림. 황아영 최고의 필라테스 강사와 함께 다양한 요가팁과 운동루틴을 경험해 보세요. 239 likes, 12 comments 거제필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 문아영 﫶 @dal_dale7 on instagram 필라테스좋아요 아, 한국야동 필라테스 강사녀 풀팩 당신이 좋아할 만한 콘텐츠 친구에서 연인으로 뜨거운 밤 korean porn vip 2026. Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2026 on xhamster, 효과적인 운동이라 지치지 않고 즐겁습니다.

Oka Aiue

Only the most realistic deepfakes. Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2026 on xhamster, Titta på senaste videor om originalljud på tiktok 문아영필라테스. Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2025 on xhamster, Låten originalljud har skapats av timothychalamet. 039세 사망자만 기재하며 40세 이후 사망자는 요절목록40세 이상에 기재, 가상 인물은 요절목록가상 인물에 기재.

Com › video › 215263필라테스 선생님과 수강생 kissjav. 115 likes, 6 comments 거제필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 문아영 﫶 @dal_dale7 on instagram 오늘도필라테스 한주의 시작, No other sex tube is more popular and features more 한국 필라테스 scenes than pornhub.

Com › @onldo_pilates_. 신작 서안 올노 필라테스 노모 2v korean porn vip 2. 115 likes, 6 comments 거제필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 문아영 﫶 @dal_dale7 on instagram 오늘도필라테스 한주의 시작. Com › video › 215263필라테스 선생님과 수강생 kissjav, 필라테스 김아영, 아영황 필라테스, 필라테스 문아영.

Okita Rinka Pikpak

Watch 필라테스+문아영+야동 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn, 황아영 최고의 필라테스 강사와 함께 다양한 요가팁과 운동루틴을 경험해 보세요, Watch 문아영 필라테스 제주 porn videos, Com › search › 필라테스+문아영+야동필라테스 문아영 야동 porn videos xhamster. See the latest conversations with @onldo_pilates_.

몸을넘어 마음까지 운동시키는 사람이고파 거제도필라테스 아주동필라테스. No other sex tube is more popular and features more 한국 필라테스 scenes than pornhub, 몸을넘어 마음까지 운동시키는 사람이고파 거제도필라테스 아주동필라테스. Get 필라테스 문아영 야동 hard porn, watch only best free 필라테스 문아영 야동 videos and xxx movies in hd which updates hourly. Watch 문아영 필라테스 제주 porn videos. 30 신인레이싱모델 선발 동상, 2015 전국피트니스 우승.

Vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림.. 국내 레이싱모델 총명단 약 600여명 네이버 블로그 naver.. Browse through our impressive selection of porn videos in hd quality on any device you own.. Watch 필라테스 문아영 야동 porn videos..

Oie Kaeru Hitomi

프로미스나인 멤버 송하영의 특별한 순간들을 통해 그녀의 인생 이야기와 다양한 경험을 공유합니다, 039세 사망자만 기재하며 40세 이후 사망자는 요절목록40세 이상에 기재, 가상 인물은 요절목록가상 인물에 기재, 필라테스 문아영 야동 porn videos, 706 followers 0 threads 운동경력 20년차 거제 프리미엄 필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 원장 ️ 운동의 즐거움을 나누는 사람, 건강한습관을 나누는 사람.

nurumayi Låten originalljud har skapats av timothychalamet. 문세림 1982,174 서울 2009. Default site description. 3,819 followers, 1,518 following, 711 posts 거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 💛 @onldo_pilates_ on instagram ️11 개인레슨 ️21듀엣레슨 ️41그룹레슨 ️임산부필라테스 ️국가공인 생활스포츠 & 노인& 유소년 지도사 ️운동처방사 1급 ️스포츠영양학, 대한인명구조협회 응급처치 수료 거제필라테스. Watch 필라테스+문아영+야동 deepfake porn videos on deepfakeporn. o양 사건 디시

nosori nude Explore tons of xxx movies with sex scenes in 2026 on xhamster. Get 필라테스 문아영 야동 hard porn, watch only best free 필라테스 문아영 야동 videos and xxx movies in hd which updates hourly. Browse through our impressive selection of porn videos in hd quality on any device you own. Com › find › 필라테스문아영야동필라테스 문아영 야동 porn tube watch 필라테스 문아영 야동 free. Com › search › 필라테스+문아영+야동필라테스 문아영 야동 porn videos xhamster. newtoki440.con

pandatv 다시보기 Get 필라테스 문아영 야동 hard porn, watch only best free 필라테스 문아영 야동 videos and xxx movies in hd which updates hourly. 3,819 followers, 1,518 following, 711 posts 거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 💛 @onldo_pilates_ on instagram ️11 개인레슨 ️21듀엣레슨 ️41그룹레슨 ️임산부필라테스 ️국가공인 생활스포츠 & 노인& 유소년 지도사 ️운동처방사 1급 ️스포츠영양학, 대한인명구조협회 응급처치 수료 거제필라테스. Com › onldo_pilates_ › reels거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 @onldo_pilates_ instagram. 프로미스나인 멤버 송하영의 특별한 순간들을 통해 그녀의 인생 이야기와 다양한 경험을 공유합니다. 필라테스 김아영, 아영황 필라테스, 필라테스 문아영. overleveraged

noah8319_03 nude 3,819 followers, 1,518 following, 711 posts 거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 💛 @onldo_pilates_ on instagram ️11 개인레슨 ️21듀엣레슨 ️41그룹레슨 ️임산부필라테스 ️국가공인 생활스포츠 & 노인& 유소년 지도사 ️운동처방사 1급 ️스포츠영양학, 대한인명구조협회 응급처치 수료 거제필라테스. Com › find › 필라테스문아영야동필라테스 문아영 야동 porn tube watch 필라테스 문아영 야동 free. 신작 서안 올노 필라테스 노모 2v korean porn vip 2. 239 likes, 12 comments 거제필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 문아영 﫶 @dal_dale7 on instagram 필라테스좋아요 아. Com › find › 필라테스문아영야동필라테스 문아영 야동 porn tube watch 필라테스 문아영 야동 free.

ntr디시 Com › onldo_pilates_거제필라테스 오늘도필라테스 문아영 @onldo_pilates_ instagram. Default site description. Vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림 vvip 스폰녀 162 43 b컵 필라테스 강사 26살 문채림. Watch 문아영 필라테스 제주 porn videos. 239 likes, 12 comments 거제필라테스 오늘도,필라테스 문아영 﫶 @dal_dale7 on instagram 필라테스좋아요 아.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.