아직 치지직 팔로우 안했다면 모찌슬이 팔로우 해주세요 ️.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

64 likes, 8 comments ye. 64 likes, 8 comments ye. Sally on septem 퇴폐미🍷 오늘 촬영 보정전 허락맡고 올리는 사진들 이쁘게 찍어주셔서 감사합니다 ️ @glowing. 우리엄마랑 아빠 둘이서 놀러가본적이 결혼하시고 한번도없으신데 갈기회를 얻는다면 우리부모님께 드리고싶어요.

아줌마 Tumbex

리얼한 귤 감귤 말랑이 쫀득 주물럭 모찌 스트레스볼 아동 kc. 우리엄마랑 아빠 둘이서 놀러가본적이 결혼하시고 한번도없으신데 갈기회를 얻는다면 우리부모님께 드리고싶어요. Likes, 5 comments ye.

Sally public videos and photos viewer imginn.. Likes, 14 comments ye.. 1 % 뷰어십 평균 시청자 방송시간 530 명 46.. 64 likes, 8 comments ye..

아이유 보지

수원성대 이자카야 뎅과꼬치로 동네에 이런 곳이 있었다니 이제라도 안건 행운️ 모듬 꼬치, 어묵, 하이볼 뭐 하나 빠지는게 없음. Sally on decem 하루에 말하능 시간 7시간이 맥시멈잉가 그거 넘어가니까 목아푸댜, 전생슬 리무르 쿠션 캐릭터 슬라임 애착인형 애니매이션 굿즈. Likes, 17 comments ye.

아이 야마다

리얼한 귤 감귤 말랑이 쫀득 주물럭 모찌 스트레스볼 아동 kc, Likes, 1 comments ye. Sally_cos on janu 팀포트리스2 파이로 화염방사기 제작 팀포트리스2 파이로 teamfortress2 cosplay 코스프레제작 코스프레수주 코스프레 지스타 지스타2024 3dprinting 3dmodeling, 옛날에 일본 편의점에서 사먹었던 모찌랑 되게 비슷한데 모찌는 엄청 쫀득하고 생초콜릿이 통으로 들어있어서 얼려먹으면 꾸덕하니 더 맛있어요 세븐. 318 likes, 7 comments ye, Sally on janu 다음주 월요일부터 바리스타도 한당.

아오쿠마시

Likes, 3 comments ye. Likes, 1 comments ye. 지난 12일 히콩은 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 폭로 왜 했냐고, 보라색 슬랑이 판매, 수제 타바말랑이, 쫀득한 말랑이, 타바스퀴시 수제 저 조만간에 버터감 말랑이들이랑 결혼해야하나봐여 느낌이 너무.

지난 12일 히콩은 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 폭로 왜 했냐고. 리얼한 귤 감귤 말랑이 쫀득 주물럭 모찌 스트레스볼 아동 kc 쫀득이 스쿼시볼 정서안정. 4 match to marry with parents 2026 yourtv on dailymotion, 여섯개가 된 나 불로소득까지 굴러굴러🐕, 보라색 슬랑이 판매, 수제 타바말랑이, 쫀득한 말랑이, 타바스퀴시 수제 저 조만간에 버터감 말랑이들이랑 결혼해야하나봐여 느낌이 너무. Likes, 8 comments ye.

아프리카 햄이 디시 감정표현도 서툴렀고, 내 감정을 드러내면 지는거라 배워서 남아있는. Discover videos related to 모찌슬이 on kwai. Likes, 11 comments ye. Sally on 요새 방송도 재밌고 춤 연습하는 것도 재밌고 하나하나 해가는 재미에 매일 너무 신나요 ️ 코스프레 마감하느라 그동안 못했던 라이키도, 인스타도 열심히 해볼게요. Sally on ap 탈색약 안와서 미미에디션으로 벚꽃 구경🌸🌸 오늘의 사진사 by @chorong2s. 아이온2 치유 성 스킬트리 디시

아키 히메노 야스 Likes, 3 comments ye. 수원성대 이자카야 뎅과꼬치로 동네에 이런 곳이 있었다니 이제라도 안건 행운️ 모듬 꼬치, 어묵, 하이볼 뭐 하나 빠지는게 없음. 어제 강소연의 격한 반응에 좋아하는 모찌슬이님. 우리엄마랑 아빠 둘이서 놀러가본적이 결혼하시고 한번도없으신데 갈기회를 얻는다면 우리부모님께 드리고싶어요. 호츄, 미츄 부부 아들내미들 호찌,아찌에게 남동생이 찾아왔어요. 아카캉 속바지

아이온2 로스트아크 디시 Likes, 1 comments ye. Sally on janu 다음주 월요일부터 바리스타도 한당. 수원성대 이자카야 뎅과꼬치로 동네에 이런 곳이 있었다니. Sally on febru 이쁜이랑 촬영 ️ 기적적인 스케줄에 기적같이 살아있따 하핫. Likes, 14 comments ye. 아키 콩 gif

아이온2 20대 Sally on decem 하루에 말하능 시간 7시간이 맥시멈잉가 그거 넘어가니까 목아푸댜. 아직 치지직 팔로우 안했다면 모찌슬이 팔로우 해주세요 ️. Likes, 1 comments ye. 1 % 뷰어십 평균 시청자 방송시간 530 명 46. Space 컨셉촬영 스냅사진 스냅 스튜디오 천안스튜디오 퇴폐미.

아야코 스포 수원성대 이자카야 뎅과꼬치로 동네에 이런 곳이 있었다니. Sally on febru 이쁜이랑 촬영 ️ 기적적인 스케줄에 기적같이 살아있따 하핫. D1 마지막으로 남겨보는 대한이품은 모습 결혼을 약속한 순간부터 간절히 바랬던 아기, 간절했던만큼 힘들어도 웃으면서 육아해봅시다. 모찌탕후루의 비밀과 맛있게 만드는 방법. Likes, 5 comments ye.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.