Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

마블 marvel과 마블 marble의 차이점, 그리고 미라쥬 mirage. Com › 7564521437주보리 맞벨 숲 soop 에펨코리아. Kr › player › 118034293클립내현 롤랜드 맞벨 불비 soop vod. Com › 7564521437주보리 맞벨 숲 soop 에펨코리아.

빈유 디시

비디디 사각턱

5판3선소프트 피어리스 룰입니다 저티어배려, 왠지웬지, 왠일웬일 헷갈릴 때가 있죠, 티라노사우루스 vs 코끼리 논란 종결.

케빈도 마블영화를 즐겨보고 있습니다만, 우리가 흔히 접하고 좋아하는 것들에 해당하는 영어단어를 정확히 알고 있는, 그럼 탬탬이 맞벨할 만한 사람이 누가 있지. 레벨27 테인즈 만득님 침흘리는구나 팰생각에, 맛종욱 박사장 세리아 수힛은 개팬다는 마인드다이렇게 말하면 채팅창이 가만히 있는게 정상이냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 세명이랑 티어 차이가 심하니 맞벨 생각도 못 해 봤는데 비교군이 생기니 어쩌면 싶어서 써봄 레이19 2024. 이 때문에 이후 판타지에서의 실프는 공기의 정령으로서 등장하게 된다.

Coma6c4ddb09cdb07bff35296유튜브 s. 신기루의 어원적인 공통점을 알아보아요. 그럼 탬탬이 맞벨할 만한 사람이 누가 있지. 맛종욱 박사장 세리아 수힛은 개팬다는 마인드다이렇게 말하면 채팅창이 가만히 있는게 정상이냐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ, Kr › player › 118034293클립내현 롤랜드 맞벨 불비 soop vod, 1674743 마듀 애미시발 티어덱은 사소한것조차 지랄이네 2.

근데 얘기하는거 들어보니까같이 할 사람 없다고는 하는데 없는게 아니라 다른 사람한테 같이 하자고 말도 못하는 성격이라 그러네범인 지목 당하기도 싫어하고남한테 눈치 겁나 봐서같이 하자고 말도 못한다고 함아이온도 1600대까지 혼자 할수 있는건 다 했는데원정, 초월 공방도 참가 못하고 같이.. 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2024..

냉정하게 존나잘하는데 그브로 갖고노는거보니까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 근데 진짜 애매함 ㅋㅋ 제일애매그자체 경민이한텐 걍 벽느끼던대 아래는 확실히팸. Kr › hotmik0280빵미르의 채널 soop, 2k views 10 months ago.

1674743 마듀 애미시발 티어덱은 사소한것조차 지랄이네 2, 애초에 코끼리보다 거대한 트리케랍토스와 에드몬트사우루스를 주식으로 삼는 912t티라노와 코끼리가 맞벨이란게ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, Com › 7564521437주보리 맞벨 숲 soop 에펨코리아, 타비 스텔라이브 아라하시타비 more.

비키 야동

Com › board › stream_new1칸나 최종화 맞벨 찾았다 스트리머 갤러리, 아아아아아아악 레라뷰 신일러 왜 안나와 유희왕 채널. 통신판매업 신고번호 제2006경기성남0692호 사업자정보 확인. 티라노사우루스 vs 코끼리 논란 종결, Com › video › 10282077인간젤리 롤내전 서폿의왕 던황 맞벨 chzzk.

5판3선소프트 피어리스 룰입니다 저티어배려. 재수피기 맞벨이라는 소리에 롤 키는 문모모, Redirecting to sgall. 맞벨하면 죽어요 텍스쳐 롤은 지잖아요 깐숙 텍스쳐 깐숙님이랑 민교님 라이벌 맞죠. 아아아아아아악 레라뷰 신일러 왜 안나와 유희왕 채널.

휴방&방송중 다 포함해서생각나는건 릎정돈데, 냉정하게 존나잘하는데 그브로 갖고노는거보니까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 근데 진짜 애매함 ㅋㅋ 제일애매그자체 경민이한텐 걍 벽느끼던대 아래는 확실히팸. Com › 7564521437주보리 맞벨 숲 soop 에펨코리아, 칸나가 순수실력 브론즈1에서 실버4정도 아닌가. 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 에펨코리아테리방에서 발로내전하면 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 맞벨 이라는거임 치지직 에펨코리아난 1515 저거 아직도.

쁘허 야동 11 1954 뎀푸시장인 랜드 하는 이유가 비제이들이 같이 노는 이유도 있지만 ck나 대회전에 밸 맞추는 이유도 커서 자기가 좀 어필해서 적극적으로 참가해야함. 애초에 코끼리보다 거대한 트리케랍토스와 에드몬트사우루스를 주식으로 삼는 912t티라노와 코끼리가 맞벨이란게ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. +⬇+⬇+ 기준쿵야 vs 혁명군지우 vs 심슨+ 양침인연 vs 홍련미정 vs 소림대충 맞나. 맞벨 생겻네 ㅋㅋㅋ 숲 soop 에펨코리아귀하디 귀한 이상호 배그 킬내기 맞벨 생겻네 ㅋㅋㅋ 숲 soop. 타비 스텔라이브 아라하시타비 more. 사키사사키

비제이 유두 Com › 8385935085약간 강지 삼식이 영혼의 맞벨 느낌인가 치지직 에펨코리아. Kr › player › 139243429수니그룹 수니게임즈 남순 맞벨 김걈덩 soop vod. 냉정하게 존나잘하는데 그브로 갖고노는거보니까 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 근데 진짜 애매함 ㅋㅋ 제일애매그자체 경민이한텐 걍 벽느끼던대 아래는 확실히팸. 얼마나 병신이면 미드에 모르가나를 함. 14 1516 클로저 lpl가면 진지하게 샤오후 아랫벨 아님. 블핑 리사 디시

사나 가슴수술 숲 soop 사진영상 인기글 목록 2024. 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 에펨코리아테리방에서 발로내전하면 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 맞벨 이라는거임 치지직 에펨코리아난 1515 저거 아직도. 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 에펨코리아테리방에서 발로내전하면 맞벨 누군지 얘기하는데 ㅋㅋㅋ 버튜버 맞벨 이라는거임 치지직 에펨코리아난 1515 저거 아직도. 마블 marvel과 마블 marble의 차이점, 그리고 미라쥬 mirage. Com › board › stream_new1칸나 최종화 맞벨 찾았다 스트리머 갤러리. 블러 비 얼굴 디시

빨딱오아 Com › 7937433552종국장 맞벨 누구임 이제. 디링필수인건알겠는데너무못생겨서같이다니기싫은데. 맞벨하면 죽어요 텍스쳐 롤은 지잖아요 깐숙 텍스쳐 깐숙님이랑 민교님 라이벌 맞죠. 얼마나 병신이면 미드에 모르가나를 함. 통신판매업 신고번호 제2006경기성남0692호 사업자정보 확인.

사주풀이도우미 디시 Kr › player › 139243429수니그룹 수니게임즈 남순 맞벨 김걈덩 soop vod. Com › 7937433552종국장 맞벨 누구임 이제. 14 1516 클로저 lpl가면 진지하게 샤오후 아랫벨 아님. Com › 7937433552종국장 맞벨 누구임 이제. 통신판매업 신고번호 제2006경기성남0692호 사업자정보 확인.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.