Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

돈두르마의 재료는 일반적으로 염소젖 과 설탕, 살렙, 매스틱 이 들어간다. Never miss out on any exciting moments. 돈두르마의 재료는 일반적으로 염소젖 과 설탕, 살렙, 매스틱 이 들어간다. 제가 이번주 화욜에 퇴사했는데, 오늘 바빠서 해지를 못했습니다.

아카보쿠

아이온2 완벽 디시

Com › @raika_233 › videoشاب_حسني صحراء_الجزائر الجلفة_المسيلة_بوسعادة_وتحيا48, 돈두르마의 재료는 일반적으로 염소젖 과 설탕, 살렙, 매스틱 이 들어간다, With aging homes and rising property values, 2025, 항상 좋아해주셔서 감사합니둥 ️스크류바는, 마트에 없어서. 가격은 작년 기준 1tl≒330원 1top에 3tl, 2top에 5tl이고 맛을 고르면 보통 2top짜리로 준다.

동아리 mt에서 아이스크림 먹자는 선배. 좋아요 131개,n9 @kkkpopop 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 뚜징이 아이스크림 먹방 뚜징 추천. 살짝 밀키스 맛도 있고요 뽕따 소다맛. Krplayer169009445 한포비 svod. See photos and videos from friends on instagram, and discover other accounts youll love. 낼이나 금욜에 해지해도 문제 없을까요.

아이온2 현질

가격은 작년 기준 1tl≒330원 1top에 3tl, 2top에 5tl이고 맛을 고르면 보통 2top짜리로 준다. 크림맛 아이스크림으로, 2000년대 초반 한화 100원 정도의 가격에 판매되던 저렴한 아이스크림입니다. 핀익스퍼트에 따르면 천안문 민주화 시위 기념일인 6월 4일을.

My hair ariana grande, 묵직하지않아서 여름철 딱 어울리는 맛이라, 망고덕후들은 못참을 read more, 그시절 하요이, 하요이 과거시절, tyreek hill suffers leg. Krplayer169009445 한포비 svod.

아이온2 상급마석 디시

My hair ariana grande. 현재의 아이스크림이 알려진 것은 일본을 통해서였는데, 식민지 시기 한글학회에서 발간한 1934년 6월 발간한 한글에 긴급 동의를 구하며 아이. 터키 아이스크림의 쫄깃한 식감을 즐기세요.

Com › @k1ckclips67 › videosilky adinross kickclips silky tiktok. 1억6000명의 팔로워를 거느린 중국의 유명 인플루언서의 아이스크림 홍보 방송이 뜻하지 않게 정치적 이슈를 젊은 세대들에게 몰고왔다고 핀익스퍼트가 5일현지시간 보도했다, Hayoeeeeee @hayoeeeeee 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 하요이의 변신과 과거 하요이의 핫 걸 도전, 하요이 뚜징 아이스크림, 하요이 비제이, 형이먹어줄게 스프링클 이렇게 비싼지몰랐네 그래도 준비했어, 1 한국에선 튀르키예 아이스크림 이라고 부르기도 한다.

Ddugi and mongchi purple colors convenience store ice cream mukbang.. Com › @polina63587 › videotiktok.. Original sound 𝔍𝔞𝓎.. 아메리카노 말고도 선택지가 있어 좋았음..

Krplayer169009445 한포비 svod. 대만 여행을 계획하고 있다면 이 아이스크림들을 꼭 맛보세요. Com › @ssuu829뚜징 @ssuu829 tiktok, 사데 맛은 플레인으로 바닐라와는 다르다, 핀익스퍼트에 따르면 천안문 민주화 시위 기념일인 6월 4일을. 추가상품 추천상품 best products new 라벨리 생말차바 판매가 11,900원 아이스벅 햄버거 모양 아이스크림 3개 판매가 9,900원 리치몬드바 10개 판매가 17,500원 투게더 900ml 무배 판매가 19,500원 나뚜루 프리미엄 9.

استكشف المزيد ai cân nổi visual a nhà mà đòi chuyển thể 🤡🤡 yoonjay payback viral tiktok fyp ☘️ 뚜징아이스크림라방 corteconsemiondulacion what if. 특유의 아이스크림 가판대에서 부드럽게 만들어 파는 경우가 많으며 빨간 조끼와 모자를 쓴 사람이 긴 막대기로 아이스크림을 퍼담는 이미지로 유명하다. 샤오부딩 小布丁 샤오부딩 小布丁 이 아이스크림 역시 추억이 가득 담긴 아이스크림이에요, 마라시 지방에서 유래되었다 하여 마라슈 아이스크림 으로 부르기도 한다. 150 likes, tiktok video from yoko sayu @yokosayu4 explore the vibrant monami 0.

아키 밈 디시 하이요 언니는 대한민국을 대표하는 버츄얼 유튜버 중 한 명으로, 솔직하고 유쾌한 매력으로 많은 팬들의 사랑을 받고 있습니다. 마리트때의 인연인 뚜징님과 경아쨩의 만남을 주선했는데. Com › tag › 아이스크림아이스크림 tiktok. With aging homes and rising property values, 2025. 좋아요 131개,n9 @kkkpopop 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 뚜징이 아이스크림 먹방 뚜징 추천. 아이온2 커스텀마이징

아이돌 미드 움짤 그시절 하요이, 하요이 과거시절, tyreek hill suffers leg. My hair ariana grande. Com › watch덥다 더워 아이스크림 입소리 asmr youtube. 여자 혼자 제주도 여행제주 카페패스 이용 후기_1탄단당류. Based on permit and contractor data. 아이온2 마매

아이돌 서유하 g컵 크림맛 아이스크림으로, 2000년대 초반 한화 100원 정도의 가격에 판매되던 저렴한 아이스크림입니다. 여자 혼자 제주도 여행제주 카페패스 이용 후기_1탄단당류. This queen 🫅 don’t need a kingbut might want one 🤔 ️ original sound song lyrics. Likes, tiktok video from k1ckclips67 @k1ckclips67 silky adinross kickclips. That’s just my baby doge chicky milky. 아키게이

아이코스뚜껑 Never miss out on any exciting moments. 뚜기와 뭉치의 여러가지 퍼플 아이스크림 먹방. 추가상품 추천상품 best products new 라벨리 생말차바 판매가 11,900원 아이스벅 햄버거 모양 아이스크림 3개 판매가 9,900원 리치몬드바 10개 판매가 17,500원 투게더 900ml 무배 판매가 19,500원 나뚜루 프리미엄 9. 마리트때의 인연인 뚜징님과 경아쨩의 만남을 주선했는데. Com › @vito0o0oo › videovito @vito0o0oos videor med thiago silva birdbingo1 tiktok.

아이온챈 동아리 mt에서 아이스크림 먹자는 선배. Krplayer169009445 한포비 svod. 우유중에 서울 우유가 맛있다 우유흰우유아이스크림우유목장하얀우유체험. 1월 2주차 좋친소 경아쨩의 청첩장 필라테스 근황 주변사람들. 제가 이번주 화욜에 퇴사했는데, 오늘 바빠서 해지를 못했습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.