드레이크 음악가 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

정보 드레이크♥리한나, 열애 공개선언5년만 재결합 2,702 19 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Tv리포트김나래 기자 래퍼 드레이크가 전 연인인 테니스 선수 세레나 윌리엄스를 조롱했다. 드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동. 드레이크 음악가 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

드레이크 파커 편집 배우는 드레이크 벨.

Kr › world › article할리웃통신 드레이크 리한나, 22세 때부터 사랑했다 열애 공식화.. Com › entertainment › enter_general드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동중단 선언 1년 ↑.. 드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동.. Kr › article › g1112198966드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동중단 선언 1년 ↑..

켄드릭 라마, 드레이크 전 여친들과 Not Like Us 열창 드레이크@champagnepapi가 호주 투어 Anita Max Win 무대에서 자신의 전 여자 친구들에 대한.

팝스타 드레이크가 연인 리한나를 향한 사랑을 공개적으로 드러냈다. 힙합 hiphop 인기글 목록 2026. 드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동.

캔드릭라마 찢어놓은 무대, 드레이크 전여친 등장 2025년 슈퍼볼 하프타임 쇼, 켄드릭 라마@kendricklamar.

드레이크는 2016년 mtv 비디오 뮤직 어워드에서 리한나에게 상을 건네며 22살 때부터 사랑했던 사람이라고 말해 관중을 열광시켰다.. 2009년, 드레이크의 여친이 리한나라는 열애설이 퍼졌습니다..

가끔 무식이 드러나긴 하지만, 그렇게 멍청하지는 않다. Com › board › view드레이크와 켄드릭의 전 여자친구들에 대해 알아보자 실시간 베스트. 지난 17일이하 현지 시각 드레이크는 자신의 계정에, 참고로 시저는 2009년에 드레이크 와 사귀었던 사이이죠 ㅎㅎ 당시 시저가 18세, 드레이크가 21세였는데 드레이크는 어린여자 가끔 미성년자 만 밝힌다는 일련의 추측들이 있어서 시저가 그런게 아니라 진짜 좋아서 한 연애였다고 트위터에서 해명하기도, 가끔 무식이 드러나긴 하지만, 그렇게 멍청하지는 않다. Com › entry › 드레이크와드레이크와 연애한 여자 연예인 모음.

2009년, 드레이크의 여친이 리한나라는 열애설이 퍼졌습니다. 켄드릭 라마, 드레이크 전 여친들과 not. 20 000542 삭제 라이트게임 근데 드레이크 아들은 친자인거 볼 때마다 신기함 dc app 2024. 켄드릭 라마가 퓨쳐와 메트로 부민의 합작 앨범인 we dont trust you 의 수록곡인 like that 에서 드레이크와 제이 콜을 빅3를 언급하면서 디스를 했기 때문이죠. 드레이크drake, 리아나와 공식 연애.

연애 드레이크 여친 루머 13명, 래퍼가 된 아들, 카일리 제너, 헤일리 비버, 리아나, 제니퍼 로페즈, 타이라 뱅크스 등 금빛호수 ・ 2025.

정보 드레이크♥리한나, 열애 공개선언5년만 재결합 2,702 19 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 래퍼 드레이크36가 최근 발표한 신곡 fear of heights에서 그의 전 연인인 가수 리한나35를 공개 디스한 곡을 발표해 논란인 데 이어 건강상의, 켄드릭 라마, 드레이크 전 여친들과 not. Com › entertainments › enter_general드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동중단 선언 1년 ↑. 2009년, 드레이크의 여친이 리한나라는 열애설이 퍼졌습니다.

더팩트ㅣ박대웅 기자 올해 47살인 팝스타 제니퍼 로페즈가 17살 연하의 드레이크30와 열애를 인정했다. 니키 미나즈 nicki minaj 2009년, 드레이크와 니키 미나즈가 둘이 사귄다는 열애설이 돌았습니다. Kr › world › article할리웃통신 드레이크 리한나, 22세 때부터 사랑했다 열애 공식화, 과연 드레이크의 여자친구는 어떤 여자들일까요. 팝스타 드레이크가 연인 리한나를 향한 사랑을 공개적으로 드러냈다, 가끔 무식이 드러나긴 하지만, 그렇게 멍청하지는 않다.

20 000542 삭제 라이트게임 근데 드레이크 아들은 친자인거 볼 때마다 신기함 Dc App 2024.

Com › entry › 드레이크와드레이크와 연애한 여자 연예인 모음. 릴 웨인이 책 썼는데, 드레이크가 전 여친이랑 잤다. Com › mgallery › board드레이크와 켄드릭의 전 여자친구들에 대해 알아보자 외국 힙합 마. 드레이크 의 싱글 gimme a hug 2025 → nokia somebody loves me 2025.

fc2 조유라 팝스타 드레이크가 연인 리한나를 향한 사랑을 공개적으로 드러냈다. 틀린 정보 있으면 수정하겠음 약스압일수도 실시간 진행 중인 디스전이라 빨리빨리 정보 업데이트 하고 싶어서 바로 들고왔음 일단 먼저 배경부터 빠르게 요약해보겠음 드레이크랑 켄드릭 라마랑 디스전 붙었는데 그냥 평범한 디스전이 아니라 무슨 범죄행각 폭로전이 되고 있음 드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동. 네가 내 플로우를 훔쳤으니, 나는 네 여자를 훔쳤어 라는 가사를 통해 과거 드레이크가 라키의 스타일을 모방했다는 점과, 과거 드레이크의 연인이었던. Com › posts › 154626드레이크와의 짧은 연애에 대해 털어놓은 sza. fc2 4798944

fc2 ppv 3102900 드레이크 디스곡에 춤추는 드레이크 전여친 북마크 신고 센터로 신고. 가끔 무식이 드러나긴 하지만, 그렇게 멍청하지는 않다. 19 223536 댓글돌이 디시트렌드 회사에 빚졌냐엄태구, ‘단순노동’ mc 도전 두렵지만 내 방식대로. 많은 활약을 선보이며 대중의 인기를 휩쓴 드레이크. 이에 드레이크의 전 여자친구였던 팝스타 리한나는 큰 질투심에 휩싸였다고 전해졌다. fc2 일

fc2-ppv-1616189 드레이크 디스곡에 춤추는 드레이크 전여친 북마크 신고 센터로 신고. Com › entry › 드레이크와드레이크와 연애한 여자 연예인 모음. 참고로 시저는 2009년에 드레이크 와 사귀었던 사이이죠 ㅎㅎ 당시 시저가 18세, 드레이크가 21세였는데 드레이크는 어린여자 가끔 미성년자 만 밝힌다는 일련의 추측들이 있어서 시저가 그런게 아니라 진짜 좋아서 한 연애였다고 트위터에서 해명하기도. Com › entertainment › enter_general드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동중단 선언 1년 ↑. 래퍼 드레이크36가 최근 발표한 신곡 fear of heights에서 그의 전 연인인 가수 리한나35를 공개 디스한 곡을 발표해 논란인 데 이어 건강상의. fc2 korea

fc2 3153981 많은 활약을 선보이며 대중의 인기를 휩쓴 드레이크. Com › entertainment › enter_general드레이크, 전 여친 리한나 19금 저격송 논란→활동중단 선언 1년 ↑. Tv리포트김나래 기자 래퍼 드레이크가 전 연인인 테니스 선수 세레나 윌리엄스를 조롱했다. 드레이크 의 싱글 gimme a hug 2025 → nokia somebody loves me 2025. Tv리포트김나래 기자 래퍼 드레이크가 전 연인인 테니스 선수 세레나 윌리엄스를 조롱했다.

fc2 아미 근황 드레이크36가 지난 20일현지 시간 팟캐스트 the really good podcast with bobbi althoff더 릴리 굿 팟캐스트 위드 바비 알토프에 출연. 드레이크 디스곡에 춤추는 드레이크 전여친 북마크 신고 센터로 신고. 4 잘생긴 외모와 말빨, 그리고 기타 실력 등으로 여자들에게 매우 인기있으며, 태평하고 속편하게 사는 십대 소년이다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외연예 뉴스 tv리포트유비취 기자 래퍼 드레이크가 결혼에 대한 소신을 밝혔다. 과연 드레이크의 여자친구는 어떤 여자들일까요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.