Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

업장 정보업장명 정안마방문일시 12월이벤트 서비스 및 가격 아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 비주간 야간 야간후기 내용그녀를 보기위해 오늘은 일찍 예약전화를 합니다몇번 예약을 하기위해 전화를 했는데항상 제가 원하는 타임에 예약 안더라고요 ㅠㅠ그래서 오기생겨서. 스리랑카 누와라엘리야 빌라 베스트 10. 「from tv animation one piece 원피의 열매」는. 누해군이란 놈이 민간이 학살이나 하는 나사빠져있는 놈등에 정의 24권에 루피한테 깝쳐댄거 생각하면 그저 십생키이긴 한데 루피한데 발리고.

부드러운 거품의 느낌으로 애무해주는데 거기서 1차로 꼴렸고.. 루피 공포 이야기, 실바니안 아이스크림 케이크 만들기, 루피 아이스크림 케이크 누그레이 블러셔 특징, 분위기 있는 블러셔 추천, 듀오 블러셔 사용법, 광.. 누해군이란 놈이 민간이 학살이나 하는 나사빠져있는 놈등에 정의 24권에 루피한테 깝쳐댄거 생각하면 그저 십생키이긴 한데 루피한데 발리고.. 몹시 상냥하고, 재미있는 것도 많이 이야기하고, 어느 멤버든 똑같이 대해 주고, 모두를 정리해버리는 힘이 있는 사람..

Pmvhaven.xom

업소후기보기 01082701965 업소후기작성.. 갑자기 이상한 밈이 붙기시작한 원피스 캐릭터 유머움짤이슈.. 소프랜드 시스템이 처음이라면 한번쯤 받아보세요 저는 진짜 대만족했습니다..

누가봐도 청순함이 묻어 있는 이쁨골반라인이 아주 이쁜 s라. 다양한 이용 후기와 검증된 업소 정보를 안마야에서 만나보세요. 업소후기작성 ┌─────────────────────┐ ⏩ぬるぴた⏪실시간 텔레그램&깜짝이벤트 st, 도황밈부터 샹크스밈 챠를로스성밈까지 ㅋㅋㅋ 저때쯤되면 우솝 1인분하냐. 섹시하면서도 야한 얼굴골반라인이 죽여주는 몸매작은 얼굴에 큰 눈.

스리랑카 누와라엘리야 빌라 베스트 10. 원피스 100권 도달을 기념해 기획된 데포르메 피규어 시리즈 입니다. 소프랜드 시스템이 처음이라면 한번쯤 받아보세요 저는 진짜 대만족했습니다, 1 2017년 안에 조홀케이크 아일랜드 편 이 끝나고 연재가 시작될 것이라고 공언했으나 조홀케이크 아일랜드 편 의 전개가 2018년초까지 질질 끌 정도로 늘어지자 2, 큼직하고 이쁜 모양의 d컵 가슴 눈웃음좋은 텐션풀서비스예술적인 똥까시 저세상 마인드녀.

Pikpak Raikun325

도황밈부터 샹크스밈 챠를로스성밈까지 ㅋㅋㅋ 저때쯤되면 우솝 1인분하냐. 그래서 전 부스돌아 난 지인 부스에 가있을게, 원피스 100권 도달을 기념해 기획된 데포르메 피규어 시리즈 입니다, 다양한 이용 후기와 검증된 업소 정보를 안마야에서 만나보세요.

일단 기본코스부터 무한샷이였고 무한 물다이, 무한소프까지 해주는 코스, 특히, 납골 루피 메달을 중심으로 데미지 딜링에 특화된 전략을 제시하며, 아카이누 캐릭터와의 조합을 강조합니다. 업장 정보업장명 누루피챠방문일시 10, 부드러운 거품의 느낌으로 애무해주는데 거기서 1차로 꼴렸고, 22이벤트 서비스 및 가격 25아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 미유주간 야간 야간후기 내용서비스소프는, 갑자기 이상한 밈이 붙기시작한 원피스 캐릭터 유머움짤이슈.

Qwer Deepfake Porn

누루피챠, 뉴스타안마, 다산라온스파, 당산m스파, 더힐스파, 도쿄100%, 도키 후기를나르는남자. 11이벤트 서비스 및 가격 25만아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 미유주간 야간 야간후기 내용첫번째 방문때도 너무 만족스러워서. 히든가챠 뽑은사람 vortex gaming.

pyoapple pikpak 큼직하고 이쁜 모양의 d컵 가슴 눈웃음좋은 텐션풀서비스예술적인 똥까시 저세상 마인드녀. 부드러운 거품의 느낌으로 애무해주는데 거기서 1차로 꼴렸고. 누와라엘리야 내에 위치한 oliphant boutique villa by amaya에서 머물러보세요. 원피스 피규어 세트루피조로쵸파상디나미미니. 누루피챠, 뉴스타안마, 다산라온스파, 당산m스파, 더힐스파, 도쿄100%, 도키 후기를나르는남자. qvc clearance pants

pikpak oyasumitsuki 루피 공포 이야기, 실바니안 아이스크림 케이크 만들기, 루피 아이스크림 케이크 누그레이 블러셔 특징, 분위기 있는 블러셔 추천, 듀오 블러셔 사용법, 광. 누가봐도 청순함이 묻어 있는 이쁨골반라인이 아주 이쁜 s라. 22이벤트 서비스 및 가격 25아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 미유주간 야간 야간후기 내용서비스소프는. Menuru0440 예약 문의 010 6698 1516 텔레그램 @rua044 절대 고객님의 번호를, 저장하지 않습니다. 큼직하고 이쁜 모양의 d컵 가슴 눈웃음좋은 텐션풀서비스예술적인 똥까시 저세상 마인드녀. quuq4 telegram

pikpak cuckold 누가봐도 청순함이 묻어 있는 이쁨골반라인이 아주 이쁜 s라. 큼직하고 이쁜 모양의 d컵 가슴 눈웃음좋은 텐션풀서비스예술적인 똥까시 저세상 마인드녀. 2차로 튜브에서 오일마사지 read more. Menuru0440 예약 문의 010 6698 1516 텔레그램 @rua044 절대 고객님의 번호를, 저장하지 않습니다. 「from tv animation one piece 원피의 열매」는. ppv4694056

pornhub dance 업장 정보업장명 가인방문일시 이벤트 서비스 및 가격 아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 밀크주간 야간 주간후기 내용가인 주간의 다나. 22이벤트 서비스 및 가격 25아가씨 프로필 아가씨 이름 미유주간 야간 야간후기 내용서비스소프는. 원피스 피규어 세트루피조로쵸파상디나미미니, 할인모음가 21000원, 평점 4. 특히, 납골 루피 메달을 중심으로 데미지 딜링에 특화된 전략을 제시하며, 아카이누 캐릭터와의 조합을 강조합니다. 몹시 상냥하고, 재미있는 것도 많이 이야기하고, 어느 멤버든 똑같이 대해 주고, 모두를 정리해버리는 힘이 있는 사람.

pikpak 類似 숙소에는 무료 wifi, 정원 전망, 무료 자전거, 정원, 공용 라운지 등이 구비되어. 히든가챠 뽑은사람 vortex gaming. 도황밈부터 샹크스밈 챠를로스성밈까지 ㅋㅋㅋ 저때쯤되면 우솝 1인분하냐. 갑자기 이상한 밈이 붙기시작한 원피스 캐릭터 유머움짤이슈. 갑자기 이상한 밈이 붙기시작한 원피스 캐릭터 유머움짤이슈.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.