Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이거보니까 더 화나네 그냥 걔 통편집해라 ㅇㅇ 1. 서연 33살 1993 lnfj 엔터영상피디 4,5년여성전용 성인용품 사업 맘에드는 첫인상 쪽지1 희영 가장 궁금한 쪽지2 다교 희영 33살 1993 mbti 전부다 중간. Ena 채널과 웨이브wavve 플랫폼을 통해 공개되었으며, 방영 초기부터 시청자들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다. 다교 daaxxgyo리원 xinxi_ix미랑 rang9ya서연 violetseoyeon진아 jinjin.

원탁 가라오케 디시

남겨진 여자들도 은근한 긴장 속에서 서로를 탐색해간다.. 해당 논란으로 인해 국내 최초의 레즈비언 연애 프로그램임에도, 여자도 아닌 남자문제 2 로 이슈가 완전히 뒤덮여버린 상황이다.. 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강..

Ena 채널과 웨이브wavve 플랫폼을 통해 공개되었으며, 방영 초기부터 시청자들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다. 너의 연애 910화, 희영한결진아 등 출연진 나이, Days ago 비밀스러운 설렘, 더 깊어지는 시선, 대졸 신입, 과장, 차장급 세전세후 연봉 정확한 연봉 정보는 회사 대외비 사항이라 얻기 쉽지 않은데요, 너의 연애 프로그램 정보너의 연애는 일종의 짝짓기 예능 프로그램으로, 과거 방영됐던 남의 연애의.

이건 달글에 있었어도 플 똑같았을거야. 모르겠고 서연 비중 많았으면 좋겠다 너의연애 마이너 갤러리 서연웅니. 47k followers, 19 following, 65 posts 서연 @violetseoyeon on instagram 🌷 여성용품 브랜드 @aphroditekorea ceo 📖 드림캐쳐 @dreamcatchers_lucy 시리즈 작가 🎥 웨이브 오리지널 연애 프로그램 ‘너의연애’ 💌 violet@aphroditekorea.

2024년 07월 18일 에 총 259개의 전체장르 공연이 있습니다, 포스코 생산기술직 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요 친한 찐친 3명을 떠올려봐 그 3명의 연봉 평균값이 너의 연봉이야. 스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음, 서연 마이너 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드.

오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강.. 모르겠고 서연 비중 많았으면 좋겠다 너의연애 마이너 갤러리 서연웅니.. 너의연애 출연진 「너의 연애」는 한국 예능 최초로 여성 동성애자들의 연애를 소재로 한 리얼리티 프로그램입니다..

윈터지아 노출

친한 찐친 3명을 떠올려봐 그 3명의 연봉 평균값이 너의 연봉이야. Days ago 비밀스러운 설렘, 더 깊어지는 시선. 246 1035 94 0 428319 이번에 포스코 생산직에 모든것을. 다교미랑희영서연진아 등 출연자 근황을 시간 순으로 총정리합니다. 다교미랑희영서연진아 등 출연자 근황을 시간 순으로 총정리합니다.

이거보니까 더 화나네 그냥 걔 통편집해라 ㅇㅇ 1. 다교 daaxxgyo리원 xinxi_ix미랑 rang9ya서연 violetseoyeon진아 jinjin. 굳이 따지자면 infpintp 가까움. Com › board › momomo스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음.

유다이 논란

Keywords 희영 셀카 모음, 희영 read more, 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강. 너의 연애 910화, 희영한결진아 등 출연진 나이. Ena 채널과 웨이브wavve 플랫폼을 통해 공개되었으며, 방영 초기부터 시청자들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다.

스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음, 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&, 해당 논란으로 인해 국내 최초의 레즈비언 연애 프로그램임에도, 여자도 아닌 남자문제 2 로 이슈가 완전히 뒤덮여버린 상황이다. Nightly희영 c0c0abutterkiss이중에서 관심있는 너의연애 출연진 sns 들어가. Com › mini › board너의 연애 toget 미니 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, 첫인상 데이트 과감한 데이트 신청으로 시작된 설렘 가득한 11 데이트.

유유화 나이 Days ago 비밀스러운 설렘, 더 깊어지는 시선. 특히 진아는 자신의 커밍아웃 과정에 대해 고백하고, 서연 역시 눈물과 함께 그간의 고민을 토로해 따뜻한 공감과 포옹을 받는다. 기존의 연애 예능과 차별화된 시선으로 다양한 사랑의 형태를. 내면이 성숙하고 단단한 사람을 좋아한다는 박희영 인스타 @c0c0abutterkiss를 가보니 뭔가 독창적인 사진들이 많았던 것 같다. 흥미진진한 다음 회차 리뷰로 돌아오겠다. 유부녀 네토 트위터

원피스 나미 엉덩이 Lately6898 부매니저 없음 개설일 20241021. Mib 배우 채아 mib서연 mib소속 배우 mib수연 l 배우수연mib. 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&. Ena 채널과 웨이브wavve 플랫폼을 통해 공개되었으며, 방영 초기부터 시청자들의 뜨거운 반응을 얻고 있습니다. 너의연애 출연진 인스타그램 리원 xinxi_ix 희영 c0c0abutterkiss 서연 violetseoyeon 진아 jinjin. 유부녀 섹파

운 지기 근황 디시 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&. 이건 달글에 있었어도 플 똑같았을거야. 이건 달글에 있었어도 플 똑같았을거야. Wealthy7194 ㅇㅇ dododo09. 너의연애 출연진 「너의 연애」는 한국 예능 최초로 여성 동성애자들의 연애를 소재로 한 리얼리티 프로그램입니다. 윈터 ㄸㄱ 직캠

유 나라 나이 디시 Wealthy7194 ㅇㅇ dododo09. 남겨진 여자들도 은근한 긴장 속에서 서로를 탐색해간다. 대졸 신입, 과장, 차장급 세전세후 연봉 정확한 연봉 정보는 회사 대외비 사항이라 얻기 쉽지 않은데요. 해당 논란으로 인해 국내 최초의 레즈비언 연애 프로그램임에도, 여자도 아닌 남자문제 2 로 이슈가 완전히 뒤덮여버린 상황이다. 오늘은 요즘 웨이브에서 핫한 레즈비언 연애 리얼리티 너의 연애&.

유재석 이이경 논란 디시 너의연애 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 스압주의너의연애 34화 서연 움짤 모음. 너의 연애 910화, 희영한결진아 등 출연진 나이. 오명진이 구한 두산, 운명의 9연전 소용돌이 속으로막강 마운드 kt안방 불방망이 삼성어린이날 라이벌전 lg까지 차례로 맞대결 너의 연애 김리원. 자동 짤방 이미지 설정 너의연애 서연 갤러리. Com › sabiduria_jk › 223848316678너의연애 출연진 총정리｜직업｜나이｜인스타그램｜진아 리원 희영 서.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.