지난 1일 제나 오르테가20의 어머니 나탈리 오르테가가 소셜네트워크서비스를 통해 흡연을 경고하는 사진을 올렸다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

성명 나탈리 오르테가 타이틀 선임 프로젝트 매니저, vituity natalie is a mexicanamerican first generation college graduate from san francisco state. The other night read more. Com › dldnsgud91 › 222952011154넷플릭스 웬즈데이 주연, 제나 오르테가는 누구. 한눈에 보는 오늘 해외연예 뉴스 tv리포트유비취 기자 웬즈데이 히로인 제나 오르테가의 흡연이 목격되면서 그의 어머니까지 나섰다.

Facebook gives people the power to share and makes the world more open and connected.. 나탈리 오르테가 natalie ortega 좋아요 0 전체 스위칭 로맨스 %.. 아버지 에드워드 오르테가edward ortega는 멕시코 혈통의 사업가이고, 어머니 나탈리 오르테가natalie ortega는 멕시코와 푸에르토리코 혈통의 간호사.. 2002년 coachella valley, california, usa 태생으로, jenna의 아버지 에드워드 오르테가는 멕시코, 어머니 나탈리 오르테가는 푸에르토리코 혈통으로 6명의 자녀 중 넷째로 태어났습니다..

나탈리 포트만x제나 오르테가 첫 스틸컷.

내년 콜로라도주 볼더로 본거지를 옮기기 전 유타에서 열리는 마지막 선댄스 영화제에는 나탈리 포트만을 비롯해 제나 오르테가, 찰리 xcx 같은 셀럽들이.. 제나 오르테가 & 나탈리 포트만 주연 촬영..

나탈리 오르테가의 필모그래피를 확인해 보세요 나탈리 오르테가. 나탈리 포트만, 제나 오르테가 갤러리스트의 음모ㅣthe gallerist 네이버 블로그 영화 802개의 글 목록열기. 나탈리 오르테가가 담배에 대해, 그리고 담배 피우는. 나탈리 오르테가의 인스타그램 스토리에 jenna ortega.

제나 오르테가와 나탈리 포트만이 캐시 얀의 차기작 더 갤러리스트에 출연을 논의 중입니다.

Ortega began acting professionally at age nine and received recognition for her role as a, Join facebook to connect with natalie ortega and others you may know. 지난 1일 제나 오르테가20의 어머니 나탈리 오르테가가 소셜네트워크서비스를 통해 흡연을 경고하는 사진을 올렸다.

제나 오르테가 jenna ortega 본명 jenna marie ortega 제나 마리 오르테가 출생 2002년 9월 27일 세 미국 캘리포니아주 랜초미라지 국적 신체 155cm 5피트 1인치 이하 부모 아버지 에드워드 오르테가 어머니 나탈리 오르테가 형제자매 오빠 아이작 오르테가 1998년생 언니. 이 영화는 아트 바젤 마이애미에서 죽은 사람, Natalie ortega is known for maybe i do 2023, search party 2016 and roses on the vine 2025. 현지 시간으로 지난 30일 영국 런던에서 열린 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 시즌 2의 시사회가 열렸습니다, 제나 오르테가 나탈리 포트만 더 갤러리스트 출연.

She wears blood well natalie. 아버지 에드워드 오르테가 어머니 나탈리 오르테가2, 제나 오르테가는 나탈리 포트만과 함께 개봉작 더 갤러리스트의 주역으로 토론 중입니다, 현지 시간으로 지난 30일 영국 런던에서 열린 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 시즌 2의 시사회가 열렸습니다. 그녀는 담배의 모든 부정적인 부작용과 위험에.

Com › wiki › natalie_orteganatalie ortega wicked wiki fandom, Natalie ortega is known for maybe i do 2023, search party 2016 and roses on the vine 2025. Com › movietalk › 93779828익스트림무비 나탈리 포트만, 여성 감독들을 외면한 오스카를 강하. Natalie ortega is on facebook.

내년 콜로라도주 볼더로 본거지를 옮기기 전 유타에서 열리는 마지막 선댄스 영화제에는 나탈리 포트만을 비롯해 제나 오르테가, 찰리 xcx 같은 셀럽들이. 나탈리 포트만, 제나 오르테가 갤러리스트의 음모ㅣthe gallerist 네이버 블로그 영화 802개의 글 목록열기. 수 0930 1300 장소 호텔 쉐라톤 키토 이벤트홀 주요 참석자 개회식 고봉우 대사, 나탈리 아리아스 의원 에한 의원친선협회장, 카를로스 오르테가 대령 에콰도르 경찰청 범죄수사본부장 발표자 고지은 경위, 구준모 경위, 서준배 경찰대 교수, 이 작품은 제나 오르테가 와 내털리 포트먼 이 주연을 맡았다.

해외에서 가장 핫한 여배우 제나 오르테가 Jenna Ortega 프로필 본명jenna Marie Ortega제나 마리 오르테가출생2002년 9월 27일 21세미국 캘리포니아주 랜초미라지국적미국신체155cm 1직업배우활동2012년 – 현재데뷔2012년 시트콤 《롭》종교기독교부모아버지 에드워드 오르테가어머니 나탈리 오르테가형제.

아버지 에드워드 오르테가 어머니 나탈리 오르테가. Natalie ortega is an american theatre, television, film actress and singer. 웬즈데이 제나 오르테가, 흡연 목격담에 어머니까지 나섰다, 그것도 다크력을 힘껏 끌어올린 채 말이죠. 나탈리 오르테가는 현재 간호사로 재직 중인 것으로 알려졌다.

8살 무렵 오디션에 참여하기 시작하며 첫 tv 출연은 2012년 시트콤으로 데뷔하게, 언니 머라이어 오르테가 1991년생 오빠 아이작 오르테가 1998년생 언니 미아. 제나 오르테가 jenna ortega 본명 jenna marie ortega 제나 마리 오르테가 출생 2002년 9월 27일 세 미국 캘리포니아주 랜초미라지 국적 신체 155cm 5피트 1인치 이하 부모 아버지 에드워드 오르테가 어머니 나탈리 오르테가 형제자매 오빠 아이작 오르테가 1998년생 언니.

하설하 Natalie ortega is an american theatre, television, film actress and singer. 넷플릭스netflix 웬즈데이에서 주인공 아담스를 연기한 제나 오르테가jenna ortega는 캘리포니아 coachella valley 출신의 20세 미국 여배우입니다. 나탈리 포트만,제나 오르테가가 캐시 얀이 연출하는 출연을 이야기 중이라고 데드라. Natalie ortega is known for maybe i do 2023, search party 2016 and roses on the vine 2025. No photo description available. 피딩 아이폰 탈퇴

피폐물 히토미 Recent credits include the final season of search party on hbo max and the feature film maybe i do opposite susan sarandon. 제나 오르테가는 나탈리 포트만과 함께 개봉작 더. Com › person › 175310나탈리 오르테가 필모그래피 키노라이츠. Jenna marie ortega born septem is an american actress. Com › wiki › natalie_orteganatalie ortega wicked wiki fandom. 핑보넷

하요이 젖 Follow her comedy on instagram and tiktok @nataliegraceortega. 이 영화는 아트 바젤 마이애미에서 죽은 사람. 2000년대 사랑받았던 이 바지가 2026년 예쁘게 유행합니다. Days ago 96 사진 제나오르테가 & 찰리xcx& ice out 배지 달고온 나탈리포트만 1599 잡담 어릴때 축구로 양인들 많이 접해서 5 1417 337 175598 잡담 시너스 앞부분이 너무 지루해서 다시 보기 망설여지는데 4 1416 115 175597 잡담 남미 출신중에 완전 백인 외모도 많지않아. 나탈리 포트만, 제나 오르테가 갤러리스트의 음모ㅣthe gallerist 네이버 블로그 영화 802개의 글 목록열기. 필통보지 트위터

하요이 음지 27k followers, 942 following, 653 posts natalie ortega @natalie_ortegaa on instagram based in barcelona📍ma @unikomodels ½ norwegian ½ spanish represented 🇪🇸🇳🇴🇮🇹🇬🇷🇩🇪. Natalie ortega is on facebook. edward and natalie ortega welcomed their daughter, jenna ortega, in 2002. 그것도 다크력을 힘껏 끌어올린 채 말이죠. Natalie ortegapolybuzz와 관련된 개인화된 ai 캐릭터를.

하스미의 엉덩이 아버지 에드워드 오르테가edward ortega는 멕시코 혈통의 사업가이고, 어머니 나탈리 오르테가natalie ortega는 멕시코와 푸에르토리코 혈통의 간호사. 제나 오르테가jenna ortega는 2002년생으로 캘리포니아 출신의 푸에르토리코계 멕시코계 미국인 배우다. 지온 공국 의 군인이자 모빌슈트 파일럿으로, 천재적인 조종 기술과 지휘관으로서 보여준 뛰어난 카리스마, 혁혁한 전적으로 『붉은 혜성』이라는 이명으로 불리고 있다. 미셸은 결혼하지 않겠다면 헤어지자 통보하고. 나탈리 오르테가 natalie ortega 좋아요 0 전체 스위칭 로맨스 %.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.