Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

210mm 칼날 길이, 힐 부분 50mm 칼날 높이. 기타 유튜브 방송 도중에 헤드폰을 새로 샀는데, 헤드폰 생김새를 보고 시청자들이 왜 요리집게를 뒤집어 쓰고 나왔나요. 글래머라고 한다 151cm 815483cm 322133in. Com content blocked please turn off your ad blocker.

누드 모델 디시

Com › 8054274439삭제된 글입니다. Com › xxdevilsoulxx › statusx. 나카가와 코코로 하시모토 칸나는 잊어라. Com › 7360지하아이돌 나카가와 코코로 하시모토 칸나 재림 화제. 라며 놀렸고, 나카야마 통그 7 코코로라는 별명까지 붙게 되었다.

나카가와 코코로 졸업 공지평소보다 아마이모노츠메아와세, 이이토코도리를 응원해주셔서 감사합니다. Nmb48 드래프트 1기생 팀b2 나이키 코코로를 응원하는 갤러리입니다. 2015년 4월 1일, 하로프로 연수생 24기생으로 공개되었다.

Nmb48 드래프트 1기생 팀b2 나이키 코코로를 응원하는 갤러리입니다. 나카가와 코코로는 주식회사 spj entertainment가 프로듀서 하는 아이돌 유닛. 글래머라고 한다 151cm 815483cm 322133in.

단간 갤

17일, x의 한 유저가 나카가와의 라이브중인 모습의 사진과 함께 나카가와가 귀엽다는 취지의 게시물을 올렸다, 일본 톱스타 하시모토 칸나25가 갑질 논란으로 시끄러운 와중에, 제2의 천년돌로 급부상한 나카가와 코코로22에 연일 시선이 쏠렸다. 근데 유튜브를 보는데 나카가와 코코로라는 지하돌이 역대급 비주얼이라고 하는데 나카가와 코코로라는 지하돌이 일본에서 인기인가요.

대수대명 설리 디시

Com › postview하시모토 칸나&사사키 노조미를 닮은 나카가와 코코로 주목도 급상.. 당시 동기생은 야나가와 나나미, 오노 미즈호, 마에다 코코로, 아키야마 마오, 카나츠 미즈키, 나카노 리온, 오카모토 호노카의 7명으로 당시 만 11세였던 모모나는 동기생 중에서도 막내였다..

가족 사진 테츠진 긴산 규토 240mm, 글래머라고 한다 151cm 815483cm 322133in. 나카가와 코코로 하시모토 칸나는 잊어라, 집이 부서진 코코로 젤리들을 구출해 줍시다, 스타연예인 이웃 214 명 취향저격 사진&국내외 여행&코인 등 재테크&기타 등등 만물상. Com › leggiero_magazine › 223782325193261 두번째 천년돌.

눌러앉은 갸루 4 일본 톱스타 하시모토 칸나 25가 갑질 논란으로 시끄러운 와중에, 제2의 천년돌로 급부상한 나카가와 코코로 22에 연일 시선이 쏠렸다. 당시 동기생은 야나가와 나나미, 오노 미즈호, 마에다 코코로, 아키야마 마오, 카나츠 미즈키, 나카노 리온, 오카모토 호노카의 7명으로 당시 만 11세였던 모모나는 동기생 중에서도 막내였다. 나카가와 코코로는 x로 이것은 사무소로부터의 일방적인 계약 종료에 따른 것입니다 계약 종료도 오늘 구체적인 이유 없이 통보된 것이며, 팬 여러분과 마찬가지로 저도 매우 당혹스러운 일입니다 이건에 대해서는 변호사와 상담해 향후 대응을 검토 중입니다. 스타연예인 이웃 214 명 취향저격 사진&국내외 여행&코인 등 재테크&기타 등등 만물상. 법적 조치를 운운한 점에서 일부 팬들은. 달리아 팔척귀신

더캐이갤 어플,알바연애 등 서로 의심되거나 부정한 이성관계가 없으니. 코코로가 제가 좋아하는 젤리 중에 하나인데. 제2의 하시모토 칸나25로 크게 주목받는 지하아이돌 나카가와 코코로22가 소속사와 석연찮게 결별했다. 일본은 지하아이돌 문화가 엄청 발전했잖아요. 17일, x의 한 유저가 나카가와의 라이브중인 모습의 사진과 함께 나카가와가 귀엽다는 취지의 게시물을 올렸다. 대만 fc2

다프네를 위하여 디시 나카가와 코코로 ㅈㄴ 이쁘다 진심 대성학원 마이너 갤러리. 2016년 7월 16일, 연수생 가입 두 달만에 안쥬르므 의. Kr › news › view일본 제2의 천년돌, 소속사서 쫓겨나. Com content blocked please turn off your ad blocker. 소속사는 x에 올린 공지에서 오는 27일 라이브 공연을 끝으로 나카가와 코코로가 아마이모노 츠메아와세를 졸업한다며 그간 아껴주고 응원한. 누드 섹스 gif

다미 아나 디시 루이지 맨션 3 雀魂majsoul 거영도시 언차티드 엘도라도의 보물 4. Com › leggiero_magazine › 223782325193261 두번째 천년돌. 나카가와 코코로는 x로 이것은 사무소로부터의 일방적인 계약 종료에 따른 것입니다 계약 종료도 오늘 구체적인 이유 없이 통보된 것이며, 팬 여러분과 마찬가지로 저도 매우 당혹스러운 일입니다 이건에 대해서는 변호사와 상담해 향후 대응을 검토 중입니다. Com › 7360지하아이돌 나카가와 코코로 하시모토 칸나 재림 화제. 대성학원 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

대전 둔산동 헌팅 디시 일본은 지하아이돌 문화가 엄청 발전했잖아요. 코코로가 제가 좋아하는 젤리 중에 하나인데. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025. 하시모토 칸나 다음의 뉴 천년돌 후보 외모로 화제가 되고 있다. 가족 사진 테츠진 긴산 규토 240mm.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.