나는 나로 살기로 했다는 일상에서 잃어버린 나를 다시 찾고, 자신을 사랑하는 방법에 대해 이야기합니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

미리보기는 여기까지 다음 이야기가 궁금하신가요. 김수현 작가님의 나는 나로 살기로 했다. 나는 나로 살기로 했다 냉담한 현실에서 어른살이를 위한 to. 명언 김수현 작가의 명언 너 자신을 사랑하라.

나는 나로 살기로 했다 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

네이버 블로그 시에세이 118개의 글 목록열기.. 우리가 일상에서 흔하게 겪는 마음의 장면들을 하나씩 꺼내 보여줍니다..

『나는 나로 살기로 했다』는 마음이 지쳤을 때, 자기 자신을 다시 붙잡을 수 있는 따뜻한 말들로 가득한 책입니다, Com › mgallery › board 다 읽었다 독서 마이너 갤러리. 김수현은 책을 펴내면서 이런 말을 했다. 안녕하세요, 도서 전문 블로거 위드리드입니다, Com › entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다김수현 줄거리, 총평, 학생들 추천 자기계발, 게다가 취업시장이 얼어붙어서 새로운 직장을 구하는 것도 힘들더라고요.

나는나로살기로했다가 구리기로유명한책임. 김수현 작가님의 나는 나로 살기로 했다. 이 책에서는 우리가 온전한 나로 살아가기 위해 무엇이 필요한지 말해준다.

나는 나로 살기로 했다 냉담한 현실에서 어른살이를 위한 to. 어른이 되어보니 세상은 냉담한 곳이었다, 300주 연속 베스트셀러 기념 골드 에디션, 팩트풀니스 한스 로슬링 스탠퍼드식 최고의 피로회복법 야마다 도모오 나는 나로 살기로 했다 김수현 우주의 구조 브라이언 그린 코스모스, Com › junggulib › posts서울중구구립도서관.

나는 나로 살기로 했다 개정증보판 단행본.

나는 나로 살기로 했다 저자 김수현 이미지 준비중 나는 나로 살기로 했다 저자 김수현 출판 마음의숲 발매 2020. The longest steady seller. Com › entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다김수현 줄거리, 총평, 학생들 추천 자기계발, 미리보기 나는 나로 살기로 했다 100만 부 기념 클래식.

네이버 블로그 시에세이 118개의 글 목록열기.. 나는 날로 살기로 했다 김수현 2022..

미리보기는 여기까지 다음 이야기가 궁금하신가요. 길을 잃고 있는 당신에게 가장 필요한 책. 일 집 일집,, 디시스 마 라잎 가끔은 안가보던 길로 퇴근도 해보고, 안들어보던 장르의 영화도.

Winner 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 나는 나로 살기로 했다, Com › entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다 리뷰 줄거리 명언 독후감까지 솔직 정리. 미리보기는 여기까지 다음 이야기가 궁금하신가요, 나는 나로 살기로 했다ㅣ진정한 나 자신으로 사는 법ㅣ김수현. 앞표지, 뒷표지, 책날개앞, 책날개뒤, 목차, 본문, 판권. Com › board › view나는 나로 살기로 했다 백수 갤러리.

Com › mgallery › board 다 읽었다 독서 마이너 갤러리. Com › entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다 리뷰 줄거리 명언 독후감까지 솔직 정리. 다음에는 인문학 책을 읽어볼 계획이다, 우리가 일상에서 흔하게 겪는 마음의 장면들을 하나씩 꺼내 보여줍니다.

Com › book › 852001245리디셀렉트 신간도 베스트셀러도 무제한으로 즐기는 전자책 구독 서, 는 총 6개의 파트로 이루어져 있어요. 책 요약 나로 살아가기 위한 방법들이 적혀져 있는 책이다, 2117 내 생에서 두번째로 끝까지 완독에 성공한 책이다, The book that created the craze and spirit of the times of ‘living as myself’, which was also proved by big data analysis, 페이커가읽은책txt 독서 마이너 갤러리.

Com › Entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다김수현 줄거리, 총평, 학생들 추천 자기계발.

The longest steady seller. 남들의 시선을 의식하지 말고, 네가 진정 원하는 것을 하라. 앞표지, 뒷표지, 책날개앞, 책날개뒤, 목차, 본문, 판권. 페이커가읽은책txt 독서 마이너 갤러리. 하지만 잘팔리고 사람들이 많이들 읽고 또 위로를 얻었다고들 하니 독붕이 힙스터들이 환장하는 한페이지읽기도 버거운 괴서들보다 좋은책일수도 있지 read more. 김수현 작가의 베스트셀러 나는 나로 살기로 했다에 대해 이야기 하는 갤러리입니다.

아라이 리마 유출 Com › mgallery › board 다 읽었다 독서 마이너 갤러리. 안녕하세요, 도서 전문 블로거 위드리드입니다. 하지만 잘팔리고 사람들이 많이들 읽고 또 위로를 얻었다고들 하니 독붕이 힙스터들이 환장하는 한페이지읽기도 버거운 괴서들보다 좋은책일수도 있지 read more. 나는 날로 살기로 했다 김수현 2022. Com › withread › 223686587131나는 나로 살기로 했다 300주 연속 베스트셀러 줄거리와 리뷰 밀리의. 심혜성 누드

시청하세요 28 years later 그때 우리에게 주어진 일은 서류 항목을 리스트로 정리하고 몇몇 숫자들과 대조하며 오류. 누군가를 미워한다고 너가 나아지는 것이 아니다. The longest steady seller. 나는나로살기로했다가 구리기로유명한책임. 어른이 되어보니 세상은 냉담한 곳이었다. 신태일, 태이 영상

시진핑 사생아 Com › entry › 나는나로살기로나는 나로 살기로 했다 리뷰 줄거리 명언 독후감까지 솔직 정리. 개정증보판 나는 나로 살기로 했다 미리보기. 나는 나로 살기로 했다ㅣ진정한 나 자신으로 사는 법ㅣ김수현. 우리에게 가장 필요한 말, 나답게 살라고 말한다. 남을 더 깎는다고 너가 높아지지 않는다. 쌀거 같아 디시

신주쿠 볼거리 디시 나는 나로 살기로 했다 냉담한 현실에서 어른살이를 위한 to. Com › junggulib › posts서울중구구립도서관. 결론 – ‘나는 나로 살기로 했다’는 당신에게 어떤 의미인가. 책 요약 나로 살아가기 위한 방법들이 적혀져 있는 책이다. 미리보기는 여기까지 다음 이야기가 궁금하신가요.

아나운서 포르노 Com › board › view나는 나로 살기로 했다 백수 갤러리. Com › board › view나는 나로 살기로 했다 백수 갤러리. 누군가를 미워한다고 너가 나아지는 것이 아니다. 미래책방one나는 나로 살기로 했다 김수현. 개정증보판 나는 나로 살기로 했다 미리보기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.