Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

에토 미사키 의 1컷에서는 미사키에게 휴대폰 소설을 추천 받는데 독특한 서식이라며 미지의 세계라고 당황하는 모습을 보였고, 후미카 1컷에서는 전자책을 추천해주는 아리스에게 전자책을 들고 다니면 서점을 둘러보거나 책갈피를 만드는 취미도 없어질. Com › minhoryang › bd6dc06e66513ba11860나무위키 이미지 이동 업로드 프로젝트 github. 이미 좆망한 만화지만 가끔 보는 사람도 있을텐데 이 만화에 히로인 역할을 하던 나나세 미유키가 그동안 계속 안나와서 사실 죽었다 하는 얘기도 많았는데이번 재연재때 드디어 5년만에 미유키가 등장함. 이미 좆망한 만화지만 가끔 보는 사람도 있을텐데 이 만화에 히로인 역할을 하던 나나세 미유키가 그동안 계속 안나와서 사실 죽었다 하는 얘기도 많았는데이번 재연재때 드디어 5년만에 미유키가 등장함.

Tv 애니메이션 그 옷 갈아입히기 인형은 사랑을 한다에서 키타가와 카이무를 존재감 있는 14 스케일로 입체화.. 아마노소라 레트로스펙트 아마미야 시논 아이의 놀이 코도모노 아소비 세라 엣찌에 변태..

Korean Cam Rare

Kyockcho 히토미

이름 김소영나이 26사는곳 강남 청담동ph129 14층 부모랑 사나봄전생 나나세, 이번에 소개할 사람은 레이스퀸 나나세 나나 七瀬なな 후쿠이현 출신으로 특기는 아크로바트, 일본의 前 일러스트레이터 및 만화가4, 現 무직 악플러5. 나나세 아오이 七瀬 葵, nanase aoi는 일본의 전직 일러스트레이터, 만화가이다.

Kuzu_v0 31

지금까지 얼굴 닮은 사람들 세대별로 다 있더라, 엽기 패션 스타크래프트 막장 코미디 프로그램 舊 정치, 사회 wow 북괴도발 합성 디시 애갤러스 태연 해외연예 겨울왕국 무한도전 메르스 더 지니어스 역사 프로듀스101 舊 주식 고전게임 수능 기타프로그램 여자. 란 감탄과 함께 후미카가 하는 말이면 뭐든 다 옳다고 따르려 하는 모습을 자주 보인다. 팬박스가서 따잇 당하고 버츄얼환생 역겹긴해. 마히토 cv 시마자키 노부나가free.

korean losg 선발 현황 순번 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6. 심심해서 찾아봤다조연포함 러브라이브 선샤인 마이너. 이름 김소영나이 26사는곳 강남 청담동ph129 14층 부모랑 사나봄전생 나나세. Com › 5716675632ㅇㅎ 5년 만에 재등장한 소년탐정 김전일의 여주인공 나나세 미유키. 나나세 아오이 七瀬 葵, nanase aoi는 일본의 전직 일러스트레이터, 만화가이다. korean sex onlyfans

lexiscandyshop露脸 스레딕 뒷담판의 나나세 아오이 비판 스레 한국어 스레로 디시인사이드 나나세는 뜬끔없이 시미즈 후미카를 공격한 것만 문제삼고 있다. 노무라슈헤이하고 나왔던 남편을사회적으로말살하는 에서 얼마나 잘하는지 보자 라는 색안경을 끼고 봤었는데 생각보다 훨씬 무난해서 편견은 그때 read more. 블로그 fategrand order 아무근거없는 끄적거림 메모 안부 밀리언아서 중단 196개의 글 목록열기. 니시노 나나세 의 노기자카46 활동 기록을 서술한 문서이다. 인터뷰에 의하면 나나세 아오이는 야마구치현 하기시의 시골마을에서 유년기를 보내왔으며 그림 그리는 것을 좋아했으나 부모의 반대로 미술 관련 진로를 가지 못했다. kuzu hentai

koreabj 팬박스가서 따잇 당하고 버츄얼환생 역겹긴해. H9 6촌이랑 연애 하다가 임신한 여자. 블로그 fategrand order 아무근거없는 끄적거림 메모 안부 밀리언아서 중단 196개의 글 목록열기. H9 6촌이랑 연애 하다가 임신한 여자. 알플 버츄얼 신상 털렸네ㅋㅋ 버츄얼 스나 미니 갤러리. kuzu 109

laliberte coomer 이번에 소개할 사람은 레이스퀸 나나세 나나 七瀬なな 후쿠이현 출신으로 특기는 아크로바트. 팬박스가서 따잇 당하고 버츄얼환생 역겹긴해. 이름 김소영나이 26사는곳 강남 청담동ph129 14층 부모랑 사나봄전생 나나세. 에토 미사키 의 1컷에서는 미사키에게 휴대폰 소설을 추천 받는데 독특한 서식이라며 미지의 세계라고 당황하는 모습을 보였고, 후미카 1컷에서는 전자책을 추천해주는 아리스에게 전자책을 들고 다니면 서점을 둘러보거나 책갈피를 만드는 취미도 없어질. 선발 현황 순번 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6.

konyang 配信 그런데 어머니가 자궁경부암 이 발병해 5년 동안 간병을 했지만, 결국 돌아가시고 말았다. Featureshared 33534 이거랑 알플 라이브있는데 유료라 링크필요 하면. 지금까지 얼굴 닮은 사람들 세대별로 다 있더라. H9 6촌이랑 연애 하다가 임신한 여자. 심심해서 찾아봤다조연포함 러브라이브 선샤인 마이너.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.