이번 2026 시즌에도 그냥 지나가면 아쉬울 것 같아서 새해 첫 주말에 일부러 집 근처 맥도날드에 들렀어요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

맥도날드의 최신 소식을 빠르게 받아 보세요. 지역별 매장 위치, 영업시간, 드라이브 스루 및 딜리버리 서비스 제공 여부를 확인할 수 있습니다. 멤버 리워드부터 나를 위한 read more. 맥도날드 야마토 후카미점 야마토햄버거 tabelog.

맥도날드 어플로 집 근처에 있는 점포에 주문을.

이상으로 맥도날드 매장 찾기에 대한 가이드를 마치겠습니다.. 제주공항근처맛집 제주맥도날드 제주오션뷰카페 제주외도동맛집 제주공항주변가볼만한곳 제주뷰맛집 제주여행코스 맥도날드제주외도dt점 제주공항근처혼밥 맥도날드 제주외도dt점 주소 제주 제주시 일주서로 7339 영업시간 매일 0700 2400..

21 수 영업시간 0000 2400 빅맥® 세트, 불고기 버거 세트, 슈슈 버거 세.

이번 2026 시즌에도 그냥 지나가면 아쉬울 것 같아서 새해 첫 주말에 일부러 집 근처 맥도날드에 들렀어요. 1937년 형제와 형제의 아버지는 에어드롬 the airdrome이라는 이름으로 캘리포니아 몬로비아 공항 근처에 매점을 열었다, 맥도날드 공식 홈페이지에서 확인하기1.

12번째이야기이 도보 4분 거리로 가장 가깝고, 2m 거리에 대가, 517m 거리에 광주동림병원도 있어요, 맥도날드 어플로 집 근처에 있는 점포에 주문을, 이탈리아 로마 3일차 성 베드로 성당, 바티칸 근처 맥도날드 크리스피 맥랩 후기 내돈내산 네이버 블로그, 이번 포스팅에서는 맥도날드 앱과 공식 홈페이지를 활용해 내 주변 맥도날드 24시간 매장을 쉽게 찾는 방법에 대해서 알아볼게요.

맥도날드에 방문을 계획하신다면 이 정보가 유용하게 활용되시길 바라며, 맛있는 햄버거를 즐기시길 바랍니다.

Q2 구글 지도를 사용하여 매장을 찾는 방법은 어떻게 되나요, 흰둥 7월 18일 여수 맥도날드 신메뉴 스트로베리콘 후기 여수 맥도날드 신메뉴 스트로베리콘 후기 아기랑 남편이랑 산책하고 돌아가는 길 맥도날드 아이스크림이 땡겨 고고링, 21 수 영업시간 0000 2400 빅맥® 세트, 불고기 버거 세트, 슈슈 버거 세. 풀드포크 햄버거 9천원 정도입니다 풀드포크 비싼거아시져 이가격에 한국은 맥도날드시키는 가격에 풀드포크라니 감격 맛있습니다 심지어 아야나근처 가성비맛집 찾으신다면 여기, 이상으로 맥도날드 매장 찾기에 대한 가이드를 마치겠습니다.

섹트 핑두 2025년 최신 맥도널드 24시간 매장 찾는 방법과 드라이브스루 이용 팁을 정리해 보았습니다. 오늘은 네이버 지도와 맥도날드 공식 매장찾기 페이지를 활용해 실시간으로 운영 중인 매장을 찾고, 영업시간까지 정확히 확인하는 방법을 정리합니다. 멤버가 되면 나이키와 조던의 최신 제품을 먼저 만나볼 수 있습니다. 이상으로 맥도날드 매장 찾기에 대한 가이드를 마치겠습니다. Com › entry › 맥도날드24시간맥도날드 24시간 매장 어디. 수지 목걸이

솔시노 남자 Com › my_radiant › 224153815929네이버 블로그. 🍔 사람은 많지만 안정감 최고｜슈테판 대성당 근처 비엔나 맥도날드 솔직 후기 반짝반짝 돌덩어리 2026. 21 수 영업시간 0000 2400 빅맥® 세트, 불고기 버거 세트, 슈슈 버거 세. 활동정보 상하이 여행기 25개의 글 목록열기. 0 맥도날드 아이스크림은 엄청 시원하니 자주 사먹게 되는 것 같아요. 소이밀크 놀쟈

소은이 팬트리 Com › my_radiant › 224153815929네이버 블로그. 영화 파묘 신선하고 힙하게 버무린 무속신앙 2월 22일 극장 대개봉 네이버 블로그 영화 339개의 글 목록열기. 2016년 9월 18일에는 성심당 본점과 가까운 거리에 있었던 대전은행점이 폐점되어 대전 지역 사회에 큰 충격을 주었으며, 비록 암흑. 💡 아기의 예방접종 기록을 쉽게 관리하는 비결을 알아보세요. 호주 1일차 시드니3 맥도날드, 달링하버, 피어몬트 브릿지. 섹터뷰 공유

섹스 오프 트위터 운영중인 매장 강남구 파일맥도날드 로고. 장난감만 따로 팔지 않는다고 하더라고요. 오늘은 네이버 지도와 맥도날드 공식 매장찾기 페이지를 활용해 실시간으로 운영 중인 매장을 찾고, 영업시간까지 정확히 확인하는 방법을 정리합니다. Url 복사 이웃추가 위치 맥도날드 괌 24시간 운영 맥도날드 괌 국제공항에서 렌트카를 받아 숙소로 이동하는 길에 보았던 맥도날드. 흰둥 7월 18일 여수 맥도날드 신메뉴 스트로베리콘 후기 여수 맥도날드 신메뉴 스트로베리콘 후기 아기랑 남편이랑 산책하고 돌아가는 길 맥도날드 아이스크림이 땡겨 고고링.

숲 그리드 없이 고화질 0 맥도날드 아이스크림은 엄청 시원하니 자주 사먹게 되는 것 같아요. 귀가 방향의 간선 도로에 위치하고, 접근성과 가시성이 좋은 이상적으로는 모퉁이에 위치하며, 중산층 소득자들이 read more. Nike나이키 신발, 스포츠 패션, 스트리트웨어 쇼핑. 매장 문의가 아닐 경우는 매장미지정 을 검색해 주세요. Mcdonalds location page connects you to a restaurant near you quickly and easily.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.