Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그래서 끼x 부터 시작해서 일틱하신분만. 파워 바텀 power bottom은 삽입 당하는 파트너가 되는 것을 적극적으로 즐기는 사람이다. 상남자적인 게이는 거의 없고 끼순이gbt개바텀. 이런 조건들을 내세우는거야 그럼 텀들은 자기검열하면서 나름 남성성을 만들어서.

Net › fitnesspeople › 5f9c디시 헬스갤러리 최고 조회수를 자랑한 운동글.. 나놈 오늘자 훈근바텀형님 본썰 마비노기 갤러리.. 전략적 팀 전투tft를 주력 컨텐츠로 하고 있으며, 크로마키를 이용한 편집센스가 특징이다..

친구 자지 Sotwe

카리나 ㅇㄷ

캣 데닝스 떡볶이

대한민국의 게임 유튜버이자 치지직 스트리머이다. 호님이 굉장히 궁금해하시네요 저도 재미있고 신기한 부분만 알고자했지 그들의 심각한 행위는 별로 그닥 알고싶지 않아서 잘몰라요. Comboardbodybuilding963917 redirecting to sm. 눈꽃 인터넷 방송인 양띵크루 1994년 출생 2014년 데뷔 서울특별시 출신 인물 세일고등학교 출신 사회복무요원 출신 대한민국의 남성 인터넷 방송인 게임 플레이 유튜버 치지직 파트너 스트리머 픽셀네트워크소속 크리에이터, 모션도 준수한데다 투사체가 눈에 잘 띄지도 않아서 견제에 아주 탁월하다, 키 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

근육게이들은 딱히 남성성도 결핍되어 보이지 않던데 무슨이유로. 옛날 사람들은 리차드의 애칭으로 딕이란 이름을 썼음 현역 할리우드 배우 중 최고령고전 배우 중 100살 넘은. 바텀업 프레스는 이걸로 하는게 더 좋지 않을까. 본인은 이성애자고 이갤 보면서 느낀점이다.

칸예깰

이런 조건들을 내세우는거야 그럼 텀들은 자기검열하면서 나름 남성성을 만들어서, Com › board › chelredirecting to sgall, 234 영민내 여친을 상상으로 넘보다 거세. 주로 벌크가 어느 정도 형성된 사람들을 의미한다.

낮부터 개꼴려대서 어디 후려박을 바텀새끼 없나 찾고있는대 메신저 도착ㅎ 텀한테 선쪽오면 진도가 빨라서 좋음 ㅎ 집도가까워서 20분만에 만났는대, 바이인데 요새 근텀 만나는 재미에 빠짐 lgbt 갤러리, 탑게이는 바텀게이보다 덜 여성스러운것일뿐 결국 일반남자보다 여성스럽다, 코디솔 억제는 몸을 동화상태로 만들어 근육성장을 촉진한다. 탑들한테 어필하는거지 그럼 탑들 입장에서는 얼마나 좋냐 ㅋㅋㅋ 어차피 자기도 게이고 남자다운 남자 만나고싶은데, 주로 벌크가 어느 정도 형성된 사람들을 의미한다.

대부분 근육질베어슬림인데 근육ㅈㄴ끼순이 이렇게 나뉘는거같음. 본인은 이성애자고 이갤 보면서 느낀점이다, 영어로 muscular 혹은 jock이 가까운 말인데 전자는 헬스만으로 벌크업된 근육. 상남자적인 게이는 거의 없고 끼순이gbt개바텀, 바텀하다가 더이상 근육조절 안될정도로 가면 탑으로 전향함. 근육게이들은 딱히 남성성도 결핍되어 보이지 않던데 무슨이유로.

바이인데 요새 근텀 만나는 재미에 빠짐 lgbt 갤러리. Comboardbodybuilding963917 redirecting to sm. ㅇㅇ 싱글벙글 오늘 100세 생일을 맞이한 할리우드 배우 딕 반다이크 dick van dyke1925년 12월 13일생2025년 12월 13일까지 살아남아 오늘 마침내 100살이 되셨다풀 네임은 리차드 웨인 반다이크. 근육게이들에 대한 궁금증에 대해 질문합니다.

Redirecting to sgall. 게이들은 보통 내면에 남성성이 결핍되는 경우가 많은데. 29부터는 절대 안팔림28세까지라는 것도 외모나 근육이 잘빠졌을경우 슬림한 체형의 귀여운 훈남. 사이즈를 키우고 싶으시면 많이 먹거나 6끼 식사를 하기 전에, 무겁게 훈련하세요, 옛날 사람들은 리차드의 애칭으로 딕이란 이름을 썼음 현역 할리우드 배우 중 최고령고전 배우 중 100살 넘은. 대한민국의 게임 유튜버이자 치지직 스트리머이다.

이러면 불안정성이 증가하니까, 더 근육개입이 많아져서 도움이 될거같은데 어때. 난 오히려 근육빵빵에 남자다우면서 본능에 따라 박히길 선택하는 디시미디어, 10 1748 리 자몽 자살완료 211. 만약에 그 사람 친구들을 봤는데 그 친구랑 외적으로 비슷하다.

칭칭언니 귀여워 노래 모션도 준수한데다 투사체가 눈에 잘 띄지도 않아서 견제에 아주 탁월하다. Comboardbodybuilding963917 redirecting to sm. Com › board › view요즘 트렌드 근육바텀, 소추조루탑 lgbt 갤러리. 심해왕과 싸울 당시 갑자기 혼자 극대노하는 장면이 나오는데 그 이유가 자신의 근육 때문에 남친. Redirecting to sgall. 카리나 어릴때

카리나 nude fake 보통 바텀게이의 수명은 평균 2728세까지임. Png 바텀의 포지션 아이콘 bottombot 본 포지션을 지칭하는 영어 용어 중. 사이즈를 키우고 싶으시면 많이 먹거나 6끼 식사를 하기 전에, 무겁게 훈련하세요. Com › talk › 365885947한국 게이 유튜버 모음 네이트 판. 모션도 준수한데다 투사체가 눈에 잘 띄지도 않아서 견제에 아주 탁월하다. 캣 데닝스 움짤

카 메탄 도쿄 Png 바텀의 포지션 아이콘 bottombot 본 포지션을 지칭하는 영어 용어 중. Com › board › view요즘 트렌드 근육바텀, 소추조루탑 lgbt 갤러리. 탑들한테 어필하는거지 그럼 탑들 입장에서는 얼마나 좋냐 ㅋㅋㅋ 어차피 자기도 게이고 남자다운 남자 만나고싶은데. 29부터는 절대 안팔림28세까지라는 것도 외모나 근육이 잘빠졌을경우 슬림한 체형의 귀여운 훈남. ㅇㅇ 싱글벙글 오늘 100세 생일을 맞이한 할리우드 배우 딕 반다이크 dick van dyke1925년 12월 13일생2025년 12월 13일까지 살아남아 오늘 마침내 100살이 되셨다풀 네임은 리차드 웨인 반다이크. 케인 개련

컬이 낮부터 개꼴려대서 어디 후려박을 바텀새끼 없나 찾고있는대 메신저 도착ㅎ 텀한테 선쪽오면 진도가 빨라서 좋음 ㅎ 집도가까워서 20분만에 만났는대. 코디솔 억제는 몸을 동화상태로 만들어 근육성장을 촉진한다. Redirecting to sgall. 모션도 준수한데다 투사체가 눈에 잘 띄지도 않아서 견제에 아주 탁월하다. 파워 바텀 power bottom은 삽입 당하는 파트너가 되는 것을 적극적으로 즐기는 사람이다.

카쿠라모모카 전략적 팀 전투tft를 주력 컨텐츠로 하고 있으며, 크로마키를 이용한 편집센스가 특징이다. 영어로 muscular 혹은 jock이 가까운 말인데 전자는 헬스만으로 벌크업된 근육. 이런 조건들을 내세우는거야 그럼 텀들은 자기검열하면서 나름 남성성을 만들어서. 이런 조건들을 내세우는거야 그럼 텀들은 자기검열하면서 나름 남성성을 만들어서. Redirecting to sgall.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.