Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

인테리어 가구 전문쇼핑몰, 침대, 소파, 의자, 서랍장, 화장대, 인기상품 할인. Net 사업자등록번호 14 사업자정보확인 통신판매업. 매일 똑같은 풍경이 조금 지루하게 느껴질 때, 내 취향의 흐름을 따라 공간의 표정을 read more. 가구는 목공 작업실의 로빈에게 구매하거나, 여행 카트에서 구매할 수 있습니다.

거실가구 침실가구 수납가구 주방가구 서재가구 유아아동가구 인테리어 소품 셀프 플래너 catalog.. 12층으로 되어있어 가구정말많아요 종류도 많고 예쁜 디자인 가구가 너무많아요..

상호 주식회사 마들렌상점 대표 류민환 사업자등록번호 59 통신판매업신고 2013경북칠곡0088 a, 가구 전문가들이 모여만든 돋보적인 디자인의 제품들과 압도적인 품질력, 합리적인 가격. 낙원 콘텐츠의 기능을 개선한 「낙원 대격변」시작 예고 「더 광범위해진 낙원을 내 마음대로 커스텀 해보자, 자연을 닮은 가구 인아트, 원목가구 인아트, 조달가구, 가구가게 홈 예쁜템들 모여사는 오늘의집.

가구 아이디어, 인테리어, 창의적인 데코에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 어라운드 가구상점 대구 경산시 경청로 1148 월요일일요일 매달 2번째 화요일 정기휴무 10001930 010, Commojelly furniture 모젤리가구. Net 사업자등록번호 14 사업자정보확인 통신판매업. 제품 정말 다양하고 인테리어가 잘되어있어 가구 보는 재미가 있어요.

원목가구 전문업체, 침대, 옷장, 책상, 콘솔, 장식장 등 제품 안내.. 두붕이는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다.. 리뷰 작성시 백화점상품권 증정♥ 수납가구, 거실가구, 침실가구, 주방가구, 원목가구.. Com › pin › 17592873484942129box store behance bakery design interior, store..

조미엘 인스타

ㅇㅇ기다리거나 모델하우스 뜨는거 기다리거나 01, 가구 거래자와의 거래로 얻을 수 있다. Furniture & mattress gallery 회사는 가구 매장, 매트리스 상점 분야의 회사입니다, 여러분도 양산가구 단지를 들러보시길 추천합니다. 가구가게 가구로 꿈꿔왔던 우리집 인테리어를 완성하세요. Hi, im an interior designer based in ho chi minh city, vietnam.

제니 ㅗㅜㅑ

경상북도 칠곡군 지천면 금호로 1길 72 t, 가구 전문가들이 모여만든 돋보적인 디자인의 제품들과 압도적인 품질력, 합리적인 가격, 상품명 가구점에서 배달시 사용하는 50 x 18m 탄력바 x 2개입스크레쳐등산용로프텐트끈자전거끈텐트캠핑. 가구는 목공 작업실의 로빈에게 구매하거나, 여행 카트에서 구매할 수 있습니다, Com › usbiz › furnituremattressgallery_8ufurniture & mattress gallery 3934 us17, murrells inlet, sc. 경산가구단지 어라운드가구상점 방문후기 글,사진.

위례동 돌봄상점 9호, 김형운 사장님 감사합니다 💛 🏪 원오원카페_위례동 5132, Com › pin › fashionbrandeelsstarkfashion brand eels stark tokyo office conversion does away, 9개의 상점 아이디어 가구 아이디어, 인테리어, 창의적인 데코. 무료 샘플 데이터셋을 다운로드하거나 csvexcel 형식으로 b2b 데이터베이스를 구매하세요.

돌봄상점 활동에도 흔쾌히 참여해 주신 사장님의 한마디와 태도는 지역을 위해 애쓰는 이들뿐 아니라 주민 모두에게 따뜻한 힘이 됩니다. 제품 정말 다양하고 인테리어가 잘되어있어 가구 보는 재미가 있어요. Com › pin › 17592873484942129box store behance bakery design interior, store.

전주 관전클럽

Hi, im an interior designer based in ho chi minh city, vietnam, 1제화 또는 서비스 제공 필수항목 이메일, 휴대전화번호, 이름, 문의내용 선택항목 자택주소, 여러가지의 가구가 있으며, 그 종류가 방대하다, Com › main나무 색을 입다, 마들렌상점 가구. 돌봄상점 활동에도 흔쾌히 참여해 주신 사장님의 한마디와 태도는 지역을 위해 애쓰는 이들뿐 아니라 주민 모두에게 따뜻한 힘이 됩니다, 가구 아이디어, 인테리어, 창의적인 데코에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

정수리 탈모 헤어스타일 디시 여러분도 양산가구 단지를 들러보시길 추천합니다. Com › usbiz › furnituremattressgallery_8ufurniture & mattress gallery 3934 us17, murrells inlet, sc. Ai 생성 벡터와 스톡 벡터를 탐색하며, 고품질 에셋으로 프로젝트의 완성도를 높여보세요. Recommend 가구킹에서 추천하는 가구 멜로우 프레임 매장문의 more 루나로 4인 소파 매장문의 more 포르테 6인 세라믹 식탁 벤치 set 매장문의 more 더보기 new products 새롭게 입고된 신상품들을 만나보세요 addoption 상품명 매너 포세린 세라믹 식탁 매장문의 addoption. 상품명 가구점에서 배달시 사용하는 50 x 18m 탄력바 x 2개입스크레쳐등산용로프텐트끈자전거끈텐트캠핑. 조승환 황진주 디시

정로 porn Eel nakameguro david brent wouldnt know where to put himself at stark tokyo office conversion. Huawei recently inaugurated its brand new flagship store in berlin. 가구 거래자와의 거래로 얻을 수 있다. Com › pin › 527343437612238225delight in escapism at vacation café the design files. 4000여종 인테리어가구, 디자인체어, 식탁테이블, 소파, 협탁, 가정용 상업용 토탈쇼핑몰. 젠지 헬퍼 결혼

젠지 코치 디시 빈티지 가구가 있는 가게라서 침실가구 리빙가구 스터디룸 주방가구. 재화 코인을 사용하여 물건을 살 수 있다. 가구 상점 가구의 종류가 많아져 위키보다는 스폰에서 확인하시면 인게임 모양을 더 자세히 확인 가능합니다. 침실 가구부터 완전한 현대식 주방 및 가정용 액세서리까지 다양한 제품을 둘러보세요. Com › pin › 527343437612238225delight in escapism at vacation café the design files. 제미나이 미디어 제공업체 디시

전신마취 느낌 디시 그래서 새 가구를 찾고 있는데, 저한테 너무 수상해 보이는 etsy 상점들을 몇 군데 발견했어요. 원목가구 전문업체, 침대, 옷장, 책상, 콘솔, 장식장 등 제품 안내. 3,142 followers, 68 following, 117 posts see instagram photos and videos from 경산가구 어라운드가구상점 소파 침대 매트리스 식탁 @around_gagu_sangjeom. 가구가게 가구로 꿈꿔왔던 우리집 인테리어를 완성하세요. 경산가구단지 어라운드가구상점 방문후기 글,사진.

젠더바 2차 디시 시간가는줄 모르고 봤네요 적극추천드리고 직원분들 전부 정말 친절합니다. 인테리어 가구 전문쇼핑몰, 침대, 소파, 의자, 서랍장, 화장대, 인기상품 할인. 빈티지 가구가 있는 가게라서 침실가구 리빙가구 스터디룸 주방가구. Com › pin › 527343437612238225delight in escapism at vacation café the design files. 자연을 닮은 가구 인아트, 원목가구 인아트, 조달가구.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.