Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

浄土真宗本願寺派本願寺津村別院、第53回北御堂盆踊りが今年も開催された。さらに今年は、北御堂と共同制作された「河内音頭 蓮如上人一代. Kawachi ondo the true story of the ten murders of kawachi 3hours 8minutes kikusuimaru kawachiya 河内家菊水丸公式・岸本家のアーカイブ 2. 河内家菊水丸をspotifyで聴こう。アーティスト 42人の月間リスナー。. 伝統河内音頭継承者といえば、河内家菊水丸さん。 盆踊りが盛んな大阪・河内地方を中心に全国で櫓に上り音頭取りとして活躍中！ 明治時代に流行し戦後に滅んだ「新聞詠み」を復活させ、世相・事件を題材にした作品を200作以上発表。.

Yatube 주소

Xxx비디오

Xmegadrive

番組終了時点を基準。時刻は目安。曜日の注記がない場合には、月～金曜日共通。 10時台 1030 オープニング 通常放送では、タイトルコールの代わりに、 河内音頭 の音源に合わせて菊水丸が番組タイトルを歌唱。歌い終わると、オリジナルのオープニングが流れる仕組みだった。 7 菊水丸が.. Org › wiki › 河内家菊水丸河内家菊水丸 wikipedia.. Jp › profile › ameba河内家菊水丸さんのプロフィールページ ameba..

甲状腺乳頭がんを克服した伝統河内音頭継承者の河内家菊水丸（61）が、5日放送のabcラジオ「changeの瞬間 ～がんサバイバーストーリー」に出演, 昭和38年2月14日、河内音頭発祥の地 大阪府八尾市に生まれる。9歳で父 河内家菊水に入門。 17歳、高校3年生でプロデビュー。吉本興業の旧なんば花月劇場で初舞台。 新聞詠み河内音頭菊水丸流家元として活動。 28歳、リクルートフロムaのcmソング「カーキン音頭」がオリコンチャートイン, 昨年は菊水丸の河内音頭生活45周年を記念した「報告会」という形をとりました。 4年ぶりの開催となった出陣式では、和太鼓の三条史郎が金の太鼓を打ち鳴らして出陣の狼煙をあげるなか、菊水丸がステージに登場！. ニュース｜ 大阪・吹田の万博記念公園「expo70パビリオン」で、特別展『プレイバック1970 大阪万博と昭和レトロ』が、22日に開幕。開幕前日の21. Org › wiki › kawachiya_kikusuimarukawachiya kikusuimaru wikipedia. 趣味：小学校5年生から1日400字以上の日記を書き続けている。自分の記録、芸能全般の資料・ read more.

河内家菊水丸 かわちやきくすいまる 芸人 性別：男性 生年月日：1963年02月14日 血液型：a型 出身地：大阪府 八尾市 趣味：小学校5年生から1日400字以上の日記を書き続けている。 自分の記録、芸能全般の資料・珍宝5万点収集。. Jp › profile › ameba河内家菊水丸さんのプロフィールページ ameba. スポーツニッポンの連載コラムは32年目に突入。 河内音頭の第一人者として、レパートリー35席を収録した10枚組cdbox「河内家菊水丸大全集」、同じく「続・河内家菊水丸大全集」を発表。 次なる完結編でレパートリーが前人未到の105席に達する。. 8月25日！今年も待ってましたー！グランキューブ大阪での『中之島なつまつり2025』😊 楽しかったーーっっ！！毎年大盛り上がりの河内家菊水丸.

Jp › kikusuimaru0214河内家菊水丸オフィシャルブログ「河内音頭」powered by ameba, 新潟東港 釣り船 菊水丸初心者･ファミリーのお客様も大歓迎, Published by ameba ownd 解説冊子 48pのカラー版で「河内十人斬り」の成立や音楽分析などの詳細解説から 菊水丸秘蔵写真館まで充実の内容。 「三十年ぶりの東京独演会」 河内家菊水丸 「河内十人斬りという演目」 児玉竜一 （早稲田大学演劇博物館館長） 「音楽としての河内音頭」 大谷能生. 6月29日（日）には、シェラトン都ホテル大阪で『河内家菊水丸 河内音頭生活50周年･プロ活動45周年記念盆踊りツアー出陣式パーティー&大阪･関西万博（728なにわの日）出演壮行会』を開催。. 河内音頭取り河内家菊水丸が毎日の行動記録をブログに更新！ 盆踊り・イベントの出演情報と共に秘蔵写真と膨大なるコレクションも併せてアップ！. 昨年は菊水丸の河内音頭生活45周年を記念した「報告会」という形をとりました。 4年ぶりの開催となった出陣式では、和太鼓の三条史郎が金の太鼓を打ち鳴らして出陣の狼煙をあげるなか、菊水丸がステージに登場！.

Yako05.com

He is also a writer and newspaper contributor, 河内家菊水丸さんのブログテーマ、「 ブログ」の記事一覧ページです。. 甲状腺乳頭がんを克服した伝統河内音頭継承者の河内家菊水丸（61）が、5日放送のabcラジオ「changeの瞬間 ～がんサバイバーストーリー」に出演. 主催 小山田青壮年会河内長野市小山田町 キタバあやたホールにて, 8月25日！今年も待ってましたー！グランキューブ大阪での『中之島なつまつり2025』😊 楽しかったーーっっ！！毎年大盛り上がりの河内家菊水丸.

2025年4月より 東港湾内 8000円 ※午前･午後･ナイト便のご希望はお電話にてお問合せください。 近海 10000円 電気釣り夜釣り 10000円～ 中深海 16000円 粟島ジギング 16000円 大型キャスティングチャーター 150000円〜 ※出船時間、チャーター等はお電話にてお問合せください。 ※前日、当日の, 楽天市場「菊水丸」（本・雑誌・コミック）99件 人気の商品を価格比較・ランキング･レビュー・口コミで検討できます。ご購入でポイント取得がお得。, 河内家菊水丸オフィシャルブログ「河内音頭」powered by ameba.

ニュース｜ 大阪・吹田の万博記念公園「expo70パビリオン」で、特別展『プレイバック1970 大阪万博と昭和レトロ』が、22日に開幕。開幕前日の21. 15k subscribers subscribed 113. 河内家菊水丸 かわちやきくすいまる 芸人 性別：男性 生年月日：1963年02月14日 血液型：a型 出身地：大阪府 八尾市 趣味：小学校5年生から1日400字以上の日記を書き続けている。 自分の記録、芸能全般の資料・珍宝5万点収集。. Org › wiki › 河内家菊水丸河内家菊水丸 wikipedia, Jp › talent › detail河内家菊水丸 プロフィール｜吉本興業株式会社. スポーツニッポンの連載コラムは32年目に突入。 河内音頭の第一人者として、レパートリー35席を収録した10枚組cdbox「河内家菊水丸大全集」、同じく「続・河内家菊水丸大全集」を発表。 次なる完結編でレパートリーが前人未到の105席に達する。.

河内家菊水丸さんのブログテーマ、「 ブログ」の記事一覧ページです。, 2024年4月3日 1100 芸能 河内家菊水丸 行司さんに憧れ続け半世紀経て第26代と第38代の共演実現した珍宝を披露 2024年3月20日 1100 芸能. 河内家 菊水丸（かわちや きくすいまる、1963年〈昭和38年〉2月14日 ）は、日本の芸人、伝統河内音頭継承者、音頭取り。.

01年の興行で初めてお会いした白木みのる師匠（右）と筆者 photo by 提供写真 テレビ創成期に「てなもんや三度笠」で一世を風靡（ふうび）された, Jp › kikusuimaru0214河内家菊水丸オフィシャルブログ「河内音頭」powered by ameba, Expo2025 万博 祭大阪関西万博 大屋根リング盆踊り～大阪から世界をつなぐ～s.

yako 새주소 甲状腺乳頭がんを克服した伝統河内音頭継承者の河内家菊水丸（61）が、5日放送のabcラジオ「changeの瞬間 ～がんサバイバーストーリー」に出演. Com › entertainment › news河内音頭とり、河内家菊水丸「余命半年」がん乗り越え11年「がんもと. 2025年4月より 東港湾内 8000円 ※午前･午後･ナイト便のご希望はお電話にてお問合せください。 近海 10000円 電気釣り夜釣り 10000円～ 中深海 16000円 粟島ジギング 16000円 大型キャスティングチャーター 150000円〜 ※出船時間、チャーター等はお電話にてお問合せください。 ※前日、当日の. 時事問題の風刺を織り込んだ新聞（しんもん）詠み河内音頭を25年続けてきた河内家菊水丸さん（45）が2日、年内に新聞詠みをやめて、伝統的な. 河内音頭記念館第99回 河内音頭セミナー（無観客）『令和4年 河内家菊水丸独演会』往年の吉本ネタ満載‼出 演：河内家菊水丸ギター：石田. yoo_nabiii

xivdoe Com › watchkakin ondo a fusion of kawachi ondo and reggae youtube. 楽天市場「菊水丸」（本・雑誌・コミック）99件 人気の商品を価格比較・ランキング･レビュー・口コミで検討できます。ご購入でポイント取得がお得。. 河内家菊水丸さんのブログテーマ、「 ブログ」の記事一覧ページです。. 趣味：小学校5年生から1日400字以上の日記を書き続けている。自分の記録、芸能全般の資料・ read more. 河内家菊水丸さんのブログテーマ、「 ブログ」の記事一覧ページです。. xvideos.2com

ychan pikpak Com › watch美律子の河内音頭 中村美律子 nakamura mitsuko youtube. 河内家菊水丸 かわちやきくすいまる 芸人 性別：男性 生年月日：1963年02月14日 血液型：a型 出身地：大阪府 八尾市 趣味：小学校5年生から1日400字以上の日記を書き続けている。 自分の記録、芸能全般の資料・珍宝5万点収集。. Org › wiki › 河内家菊水丸河内家菊水丸 wikipedia. Jp › talent › detail河内家菊水丸 プロフィール｜吉本興業株式会社. 浄土真宗本願寺派本願寺津村別院、第53回北御堂盆踊りが今年も開催された。さらに今年は、北御堂と共同制作された「河内音頭 蓮如上人一代. xovr 디시

x 보추 Org › wiki › 河内家菊水丸河内家菊水丸 wikipedia. 河内家菊水丸オフィシャルブログ「河内音頭」powered by ameba. Jp › kikusuimaru0214河内家菊水丸オフィシャルブログ「河内音頭」powered by ameba. 甲状腺乳頭がんを克服した伝統河内音頭継承者の河内家菊水丸（61）が、5日放送のabcラジオ「changeの瞬間 ～がんサバイバーストーリー」に出演. Days ago 1月27日火曜日〜その5 20時10分、夕食。献立は、料亭 湯木の湯木尚二若旦那に頂いた 写真ちりめん釜飯のもとを使った炊き込みご飯。.

yasyadong.capp ニュース｜ 大阪・吹田の万博記念公園「expo70パビリオン」で、特別展『プレイバック1970 大阪万博と昭和レトロ』が、22日に開幕。開幕前日の21. 夏の稼ぎで年中食う。夢の暮らしを河内家菊水丸さん（61）はやってのける。太鼓に金を仕込んでいる？ いやいや、大阪土着の河内音頭一本で. 5k+ followers 487 following 425 posts @ng_kikusui 夜の部はバチコンで出船！ スーパームーンだからあまり期待出来ないかな ブリ行くまでの暇つぶしに read more. Days ago 1月27日火曜日〜その5 20時10分、夕食。献立は、料亭 湯木の湯木尚二若旦那に頂いた 写真ちりめん釜飯のもとを使った炊き込みご飯。. Org › wiki › 河内家菊水丸河内家菊水丸 wikipedia.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.