Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Betterより良いはgood良いの比較級で習ったから知っている！日本語でも「ベター」って使う！と、betterの意味や使い方を知っている人は多いですが、betterとoffが組み合わさった言い回し、better offとなるとどうでしょう？聞いたことがあるような、ないような？という方が多いのではない. Jp › content › ベターオフ「ベターオフ」の意味や使い方 わかりやすく解説 weblio辞書. ブックオフコーポレーション株式会社が子会社ブックオフオンライン株式会社を吸収合併。 国内での「bookoff」店舗の運営を目的としてブックオフ南九州株式会社を設立 4月 ブックオフコーポレーション株式会社が子会社リユースコネクト株式会社を吸収合併. 株式会社シラック・ジャパンは 世界の医療に貢献する企業として、 医療用具や高性能な医療機器を中心とした製品およびこれらに付随したサービスを提供しています。.

Lpsg Coomer

Better off形もっと幸福または繁栄する状態で a well‐off widow金持ちの未亡人.. Com › corporations › 1120002041707有限会社ベターオフ 1120002041707 法人番号検索api.. Takeoff：株式会社テイクオフ – takeoff inc.. 株式会社betterは、相続税ウェブサービスの開発・運営を行っている企業。相続税申告サービス「better相続」を運営している。 「better相続」は、相続税申告にあたり税理士..

Link Stw Twstalker

To › corporations › 8011601019247株式会社better・off 東京都練馬区未上場の評判・口コミ・インボイ. 神奈川県川崎市・横浜市の職人直営専門店！ ▽チャンネル登録まだの方は登録お願いします！ s. 今日は「better」と「better off」の違いについて説明します。 多くの日本人の「ベター」の感覚と、英語本来の「better」との意味では、若干ニュアンスに違いがあるようなので気をつけましょう！ better 「より良い」意味する, Ski boot fitting at xraeb yuzawa. ソーラーオフについて 2012年のfit法（固定価格買取制度）改正後から、太陽光部材に特化して販売してきました。 メーカーや商社から正規ルートで直接仕入れを行うことにより、中間コストを削減。 厳選した安心安全な商品を低価格で安定供給しています。.

Madrush 채널

有限会社ベターオフについて 有限会社ベターオフは、法人番号707で大阪府大阪市中央区西心斎橋1丁目5番5号に所在する法人として大阪法務局で法人登録され、2015年10月05日に法人番号が指定されました。 最終更新日は2015年11月20日です。.. nisa利用状況調査新nisa開始から2年で認知度 ・利用者の満足度は8割超も、利用率は3割にとど 株式会社ベター・プレイスのプレスリリース（202..

「better off」とは英語のフレーズで、ある状況が他の状況よりも優れている、またはある行動を取ることが他の行動を取るよりも有益であるという意味を持つ。weblio国語辞典では「better‐off」の意味や使い方、用例、類似表現などを解説しています。. Jp › hojin › ichiran株式会社better・off 8011601019247 gbizinfo, Better off 意味, 定義, better off は何か 1. ベター・プレイス公式note更新しました 前回のインタビューに引き続きベター・プレイス代表取締役coo古市 成樹によるインタビュー後編を公開しました。 弊社のceo・cooは共に二拠点ワーカー！ベター・プレイスのカルチャー、上場を目指す理由やその先の未来、全員でつくった行動規範の. （彼氏と別れてから、感情的にも精神的にもずっとよくなった。） 例 my new promotion left me better off, 「better off」とは英語のフレーズで、ある状況が他の状況よりも優れている、またはある行動を取ることが他の行動を取るよりも有益であるという意味を持つ。weblio国語辞典では「betteroff」の意味や使い方、用例、類似表現などを解説しています。.

mib 결제 디시 Jp › content › ベターオフ「ベターオフ」の意味や使い方 わかりやすく解説 weblio辞書. Betteroffは過去に持っていたよりも多くのお金を持っていること、または他のほとんどの人よりも多くのお金を持っていること意味として使われています。 和訳：より良い読み方はˈbet. 法人名ふりがな 法人名英語 本店所在地 東京都練馬区春日町1丁目8番3号. Ski boot fitting at xraeb yuzawa. （彼氏と別れてから、感情的にも精神的にもずっとよくなった。） 例 my new promotion left me better off. mib 사이트 후기

macoto 디시 Jp › search「better off」の意味・使い方・表現 英辞郎 on the web. 法人名ふりがな 法人名英語 本店所在地 東京都練馬区春日町1丁目8番3号. Who is better off painting it every 10 years or leaving it for 30. nisa利用状況調査新nisa開始から2年で認知度 ・利用者の満足度は8割超も、利用率は3割にとど 株式会社ベター・プレイスのプレスリリース（202. 私たちについて つばめbhb株式会社｜アンモニアを. mib 103

mib 채아 나이 Better offの意味・和訳。形容詞もっと幸福または繁栄する状態で（例文）in a more fortunate or prosperous condition. 「better off」と「better」の意味の違いに悩んでいませんか？フレーズの語源から「well off」との比較、豊富な例文、「～した方がいい」というアドバイスの使い方もしっかり解説。あなたの疑問を完全解消します。. 「better off」とは英語のフレーズで、ある状況が他の状況よりも優れている、またはある行動を取ることが他の行動を取るよりも有益であるという意味を持つ。weblio国語辞典では「better‐off」の意味や使い方、用例、類似表現などを解説しています。. Who is better off painting it every 10 years or leaving it for 30. お前は死んだ方がいい。 weblio email例文集 1000万語の英語の意味を収録！weblio英和・和英辞書. mib 포르노

lspg dadys boy Be better off の意味 be better off の意味と使い方 you’d be better off の意味 まとめ be better off の意味 「be better off」の基本的な意味は「（～の方）が良い」です。 この「better」は well（良い） の比較級で「より良い」を表しています。 そして、この be better off には、「（私が）した方が良い」と「相手. Ldhの音楽クリエイター集団によるレーベル。exile tribeなどのソロ活動サポートや、exile shokichi主宰koma doggを包括し、次世代レーベルとして世界に展開していき. Better off 意味, 定義, better off は何か 1. Com › corporations › 1120002041707有限会社ベターオフ 1120002041707 法人番号検索api. Ldhの音楽クリエイター集団によるレーベル。exile tribeなどのソロ活動サポートや、exile shokichi主宰koma doggを包括し、次世代レーベルとして世界に展開していき.

marotix hitomi お前は死んだ方がいい。 weblio email例文集 1000万語の英語の意味を収録！weblio英和・和英辞書. 能登復興オフィス開設しました 2025年6月23日 2025年6月1日、金沢市在住の取締役を1名追加しました。これにともない、能登復興オフィスを開設しました。能登の震災復興に向けて最前線で対応してもらいます。. 有限会社ベターオフについて 有限会社ベターオフは、法人番号707で大阪府大阪市中央区西心斎橋1丁目5番5号に所在する法人として大阪法務局で法人登録され、2015年10月05日に法人番号が指定されました。 最終更新日は2015年11月20日です。. Jp › hojin › ichiran株式会社better・off 8011601019247 gbizinfo. ニコラス・エドワーズ（nicholas edwards、1992年7月31日 ）は、アメリカ人の男性歌手、俳優。日本テレビ系列の特別番組「のどじまん the ワールド！read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.