Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Let me explain them with some korean words. Tom cronin is a partner in grsms chicago office and has tried and mediated cases to favorable resolutions throughout illinois. These korean consonants are pronounced without any aspiration. Snow white has black hair and a white complexion.

스마트파일 광고 배우

스즈 할로윈 방주

Days ago 주말에 방문했던 헬로스파, Day ago 23 likes, 14 comments moltenkorea on janu 안녕하세요 몰텐코리압니다. 중고 215,295원 세금 포함 신상품 및 재입고 재고 수량 1개. Thomas tom eron exclusively represents private and public sector employers in labor relations and employment law with a combination of extensive legal read more.

For a guide to adding ipa characters to wikipedia articles, see templateipa and wikipediamanual of style.. Introduction in this lesson, you will learn how to use colors in korean by applying the ㅎ irregular.. So, to learn how to pronounce these consonants as a batchim, we just need to learn one.. 평가는 로튼토마토 에서 61%로 썩은 토마토 평점에 근접한 평균 수준으로 출발했으며 평론가들을 평가도 긍정적이지 못하다..

평가는 로튼토마토 에서 61%로 썩은 토마토 평점에 근접한 평균 수준으로 출발했으며 평론가들을 평가도 긍정적이지 못하다, Grammar focus when an adjective stem ending in ㅎ is, Shahwan bronson medical group logo 269 3417500read more, He has also been named one of the top 25 super lawyers for business restructuring and read more. A chartered arbitrator since 2012, tom has arbitrated employment cases under the canada labour code and appeared as counsel in both courts and arbitrations on read more, 톰 스마트 필 프로그램이 피부에 불필요한 묵은 각질들을 제거, 피부의 턴오버turnover을 도와줌으로써 여러분의 건강한 피부 사이클을 지켜주는 가이드가 되어 줄 것.

스즈 모리 레무

They are labeled into different groups according to their korean pronunciation, 韓国の伝統工芸雑貨 お土産, 韓国青磁 絵画, 人形、伝統工芸の歴史など, 『훈민정음』 해례본 용자례 用字例에서는 ‘ㅎ’음의 용례를 초성밖에 보이지 않았으나, 1933년에 제정된 『한글맞춤법통일안』에서는 ‘ㅎ’음이 초성과 종성에 두루 쓰이는 것을 인정하여 ‘ㅎ’받침을 허용하였다. Introduction in this lesson, you will learn how to use colors in korean by applying the ㅎ irregular, The queen gave snow white a red apple, 58 likes, 28 comments namheee7776 on janu.

Let me explain them with some korean words. Shahwan, md physical medicine & rehabilitation. 28 ♡ repost @abybom_joy 자연스런 무드가 젤루 고급진 우런니﫶 懶 햇살 미소가 예뻐서 햇님 인가. Thomas eron, labor and employment law. 사업자, 자영업자 가 되었어요 작업도 없는데 작업실 먼저 열고 매일매일 술작업 친목작업에만 여념이 없었네요ㅎ 오시는 분 모두 부암동 삼층서가 를 격하게 아껴주시기에 주로, 술맛 좋다고ㅋ 이제는 무어든 벌릴 때가 되었다, 생각하여 홈택스에.

이번에 헬로스파도 방문했을 때 다른 손님이 거의 없더라구요.. 3행시 제시어를 드릴텐데요 본게시물에 좋아요와 댓글로 농구공 또는 축구공으로 3행시를 남겨주세요 넵.. Shahwan bronson medical group logo 269 3417500read more..

슬림텀 트위터

스 푸닝 설희 마사지

난 초딩 입 맛이라 나가서 먹으면 국물만 흡입. In this lesson, you will learn how to use colors in korean by applying the ㅎ irregular, 평가는 로튼토마토 에서 61%로 썩은 토마토 평점에 근접한 평균 수준으로 출발했으며 평론가들을 평가도 긍정적이지 못하다. 기본적으로 자음 앞에서는 ㄷ으로 발음하지만, 예사소리가 이어지면 그 예사소리를 거센소리 로 만든다. 톰 하디의 팬들 사이에서 영원한 대립을 낳는 주제가 하나 있는데, 2008년 잡지 attitude와의 인터뷰에서 남성과 관계한 적이 있는가.

슈버스 토렌트 ㄱ부터 ㅎ까지는 각각 오른쪽 목차의 1번부터 14번까지의 그룹의 문자로, ㄲㄸㅃㅆ은 각각 1518번 그룹의 문자로 변환할 수 있으며 도 ° 기호는 입력이 불가능하다. 3행시 제시어를 드릴텐데요 본게시물에 좋아요와 댓글로 농구공 또는 축구공으로 3행시를 남겨주세요 넵. 나 점심 약속 99프로 안나가는 거 알지. ㅎ hieut is pronounced as a glottal fricative h, i. 3k subscribers subscribed. 스즈 자위 디시

스 트리머 빵빵 필라테스 이번에 헬로스파도 방문했을 때 다른 손님이 거의 없더라구요. Com › reel › duioswlkhuyinstagram. Thomas tom eron exclusively represents private and public sector employers in labor relations and employment law with a combination of extensive legal read more. Offering the finest selection of korean celadon pottery, lacquered and music boxes, dolls, figurines and paintings. If you just skip these rules, you would likely miss big things while listening. 스위치 이연

시드니 스위니 누드 『훈민정음』 해례본 용자례 用字例에서는 ‘ㅎ’음의 용례를 초성밖에 보이지 않았으나, 1933년에 제정된 『한글맞춤법통일안』에서는 ‘ㅎ’음이 초성과 종성에 두루 쓰이는 것을 인정하여 ‘ㅎ’받침을 허용하였다. 푸른 운동장을 달리듯 건강한 견생만을 달리길 첫 번째 생일을 축. 28 ♡ repost @abybom_joy 자연스런 무드가 젤루 고급진 우런니﫶 懶 햇살 미소가 예뻐서 햇님 인가. ㅎ의 변형편집 변형된 ㅎ이란, ㅎ으로 시작하면서 자신의 감정을 표현할 수 있는 단어들을 일컫는다. Snow white has black hair and a white complexion. 스판크뱅

스카톨로지 일본어 중고 215,295원 세금 포함 신상품 및 재입고 재고 수량 1개. 톰 하디의 네임벨류에 비하면 심히 저조한 성적이기도 하다. Learn korean, korean language, korean with english titles, learn korean language for beginners, how to learn korean, 한국어문법, 한국어배우기,ㅎ불규칙,ㅎirregular. ㄱ부터 ㅎ까지는 각각 오른쪽 목차의 1번부터 14번까지의 그룹의 문자로, ㄲㄸㅃㅆ은 각각 1518번 그룹의 문자로 변환할 수 있으며 도 ° 기호는 입력이 불가능하다. Introduction in this lesson, you will learn how to use colors in korean by applying the ㅎ irregular.

시노부 귀여운 짤 기본적으로 자음 앞에서는 ㄷ으로 발음하지만, 예사소리가 이어지면 그 예사소리를 거센소리 로 만든다. 28 ♡ repost @abybom_joy 자연스런 무드가 젤루 고급진 우런니﫶 懶 햇살 미소가 예뻐서 햇님 인가. 韓国の伝統工芸雑貨 お土産, 韓国青磁 絵画, 人形、伝統工芸の歴史など. 그만큼 좋구욯ㅎ 톰다운된 카키색셔츠찾다가 구매했는데 정말 색감 예뻐요 브라운같으면서도 카키. Day ago 23 likes, 14 comments moltenkorea on janu 안녕하세요 몰텐코리압니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.