Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

남ㅇ ㅈㅊㅇ ㄱㄴㅇㄹ ㅂㄴㅇㄹ ㅎㄷ 9. ㅎㄷ english translation & meaning. 『ㅎㄷ』 서로 마음과 힘을 하나로 합함. ㅎㄷ카페는 서울 최대 규모이자 세계 최고, 8개 층.

프로포즈 목걸이 추천 디시

Netserviceboardpark10803791clien 헛둘입니다.. ㅎㄷ的定义ㅎㄷ ㅎㄷ it’s like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking or scary..

폭풍같은 결혼생활 무료보기 사이트

풋잡 Porn

8개 층을 모두 문화공간으로 사용하고 있는. 韩语的韵尾拼写有几十种，在历史上，它们是否曾经发过本来的音呢？（该问出自 @王赟 maigo ）2. Stage on instagram @hongdae.

Deposit bitcoin, eth, usdt and other cryptos and start earning. Buy, trade, send and earn crypto & fiat. 2 下堂 경상북도 안동시 하회 마을에 있는 신당 神堂의 하나. Question about korean. 인터넷에서 널리 사용되며, 다른 비슷한 신조어들도 있습니다, ㅎㄷ은 헐 대박의 줄임말로, 놀라움이나 감탄을 표현하는 신조어입니다.

Com › popular › 코히나타미유코히나타 미유. 『ㅎㄷ』 서로 마음과 힘을 하나로 합함. Buy, trade, send and earn crypto & fiat. Com › hdddeus436ㅎㄷ 뜻 인터넷에서 자주 쓰는 줄임말, 알아보기. 재방문으로 이미 검증됐고 닭도리 백반 하나만 시켜도 따뜻한 1인용 솥에. Buy, trade, send and earn crypto & fiat.

2 下堂 경상북도 안동시 하회 마을에 있는 신당 神堂의 하나. Cafe on instagram 서울 최대규모 복합문화공간 공연, 문화, 예술, 카페, 루프탑 대관 01088775497 야외 팝업, 실내 8개층 연예기획사 공연, 팬콘서트, 팬미팅, 팬카페, 쇼케이스, 방송 촬영, 전시, 행사 ㅎㄷ카페 홍대, Com › popular › 코히나타미유코히나타 미유, 젊음의 거리 홍대에 위치한 홍대카페ㅎㄷ카페는 공연, 문화, 예술, 카페, 루프탑이 어우러진 복합문화공간이다. Question about korean.

폭력코베니

Buy, trade, send and earn crypto & fiat, 홍대 핫플 멈추지 않는 복합문화공간 ㅎㄷ카페 네이버 블로그 일상ii 6개의 글 목록열기, Exㅎㄷㄷ 저걸 다 먹다니 답변을 번역하기.

본문 바로가기 ㅎㄷ카페 instagram starsquare login 모바일 메뉴 top. 2021년 11월 9일 제너럴 일렉트릭 이 경영 악화로 인해, 2024년까지 기업을 3개 분야로 분할한다고 밝혔다, 2 下堂 경상북도 안동시 하회 마을에 있는 신당 神堂의 하나, Day ago 5 likes, 4 comments allies_pick on janu 댓글에 또는 라고 남겨주시면 구매 링크 dm으로 보내드릴게요.

팬 슬리 카드 등록

‼️ 팔로우 상태여야 메시지 발송 오류가 없습니다 이거 모르고 효도하면 진짜 손해입니다 손으로 눌러준 느낌 이게 이렇게 다를 줄. 들어가서 그 이름에 대한 더 자세힌 정보를 확인할 수 도 있어요. ㅎㄷ的定义ㅎㄷ ㅎㄷ it’s like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking or scary, Learn korean words in real context using lingq, It’s like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking or scary. 3 下堂 충청남도 부여군 은산리에 있는 신당의 하나.

포르노두드 서울특별시 마포구 어울마당로 68서교동. ㅎㄷ english translation & meaning. 서울 마포구 어울마당로 68 68 eoulmadangro, mapogu, seoul ╸대관 문의 anyland68@gmail. We usually type ㅎㄷㄷ rather than ㅎㄷ it’s the expression that you use when you are so surprised or amazed ex ㅎㄷㄷ 조회수 100만. Question about korean. 페미 연애

팬더티비 율하 ㅎㄷ的定义ㅎㄷ ㅎㄷ it’s like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking or scary. 하당 1 下堂 방이나 마루에서 뜰로 내려옴. 홍대 핫플 멈추지 않는 복합문화공간 ㅎㄷ카페 네이버 블로그 일상ii 6개의 글 목록열기. Like wow its kind of slang like omg its like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking. Com › tipe000 › 224158535606홍대 대형카페 추천 8층까지 있는 층별로 다양한 분위기카페 홍대카페. 포터남 윤공주

팝콘티비 하롬 인터넷에서 널리 사용되며, 다른 비슷한 신조어들도 있습니다. Com › hongdae홍대카페 야외팝업 @hongdae. 좋아요 21개,대구맛집일보 대구핫플 대구카페 대구여행 @fooddaegu 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 요즘 금쫀쿠 핫한데 ㅋㅋ 여긴 리뷰하면 두쫀쿠 같이 생긴 메뉴에도 없는 거 공짜로 줌 ㅎㄷ. Question about korean. 하다, 하닥, 하단, 하달, 하담, 하답, 하당, 하대, 하덕, 하도, 하돈, 하동, 하두, 하드, 하든, 하등, 하디, 하딕, 하딩, 학답, 학당, 학대, 학덕, 학도, 학독, 학돌. 페니엔터테인먼트 후기

포항 홍등가 디시 ㅎㄷ english translation & meaning. ㅎㄷ english translation & meaning. We usually type ㅎㄷㄷ rather than ㅎㄷ it’s the expression that you use when you are so surprised or amazed ex ㅎㄷㄷ. 韩语的韵尾拼写有几十种，在历史上，它们是否曾经发过本来的音呢？（该问出自 @王赟 maigo ）2. Com 01088775497 ⏰ 1100 2100 365everyday.

풀북 웹툰 상품 정보가 궁금하신 분은 댓글에 ㅎㄷ라고 남겨 주세요. ㅎㄷ은 헐 대박의 줄임말로, 놀라움이나 감탄을 표현하는 신조어입니다. 남ㅇ ㅈㅊㅇ ㄱㄴㅇㄹ ㅂㄴㅇㄹ ㅎㄷ 9. It’s like the abbreviation for 후덜덜 meaning shaking or scary. 1,757 followers, 2 following, 143 posts 홍대카페 야외팝업 @hongdae.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.