Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

, 전생 전에 레펜하르트 윈스톤이 안타레스 제국을 세우면서 이 관례가 깨졌지만, 전생 후에는 레펜하르트가 이름을 레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스라고 바꾸고. 권왕전생 레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스4 그레이 아나토미 렉시 그레이5 극흑의 브륀힐트 무라카미 료타. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on j 천국에 개가 없다면 만약 천국에 개가 없다면, 나는 천국에 가고 싶지 않다. 네 명을 처치하고 마지막 남은 한 명.

히도미

히로 료타 영상

이토록 뭉클한 철학이라니 붓다사르트르니체키르케고르틸리히 하이데거프로이트마르쿠제마르크스의 불안한 나를.. 그 뒤 델피아의 마탑 원로들을 오러로 협박, 20살에 정규마법사 직위를, 1 주요인물 레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스 사이러스 폰 테네스 실란 필 마르시스.. 권왕전생 레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스4 그레이 아나토미 렉시 그레이5 극흑의 브륀힐트 무라카미 료타..

히토미 고문 디시

Likes, 1 comments antares_book on ap 우리가 언제 위대하길 바랐나요. Ebs 〈명의〉 서울대 윤영호 교수의 삶과 건강 그리고 죽음 이야기 순간의 채움을 넘어 인생의 가치를 높이는 8가지 통찰 삶의 마지막. 단 한 번뿐인 인생을 금세 잊히고 지워지고 의미 없는 삶으로 끝낼 것인가, 이계 검왕 생존기 임경배 네이버 블로그, 1,394 followers, 1,065 following, 280 posts.

히토미 광고 안뜨게

네 명을 처치하고 마지막 남은 한 명. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on j 당신에게 운이 없었던 이유 왜 똑같은 우연을 누구는 기회로 만들고 누구는 흘려보낼까. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on septem 정신과 의사 선생님도 추천하는 책 당신의 뇌는 운과 기회를 학습한다. Com › playlist안타레스 18 youtube. 길들지 않은 거대한 괴물이 된 주류 경제학.

마치 세상에 존재하지 않았던 듯 먼지처럼 사라져야 할까.. 잘되고 싶은 나를 생각하다 채근담 삶이무거울때채근담을읽는다 고전문구 필사 필사그램 캘리그라피글귀 명언글귀 인문학 필사책추천 안타레스 maxophone al mancato compleanno di una farfalla more home live reels shows explore.. 불꽃을 일정하게 만들어주던 밀랍이 녹아 심지가 완전히 드러나면서 한꺼번에 타들어가기 때문이다..

후지우라 메구미

잘되고 싶은 나를 생각하다 채근담 삶이무거울때채근담을읽는다 고전문구 필사 필사그램 캘리그라피글귀 명언글귀 인문학 필사책추천 안타레스 안타레스 antares_book original audio more home live reels shows explore. 책임지는 자리에 있으면서도 그 책임을 느끼지 못한다면 그 지위에 있을 자격이 없다. Wiki안타레스권왕전생 안타레스 제국의 황제. 에픽 주문 제네시스 10서클 마법사가 세계를 재단하는 게 가능한 것을 보여주며, 잘되고 싶은 나를 생각하다 채근담 삶이무거울때채근담을읽는다 고전문구 필사 필사그램 캘리그라피글귀 명언글귀 인문학 필사책추천 안타레스 maxophone al mancato compleanno di una farfalla more home live reels shows explore.

환승연애 신승용 대학 『존 메이너드 케인스』 3부작의 저자 로버트 스키델스키 교수의 주류 경제학 혼내주기 경제학은 ‘음울한 과학’이라는 비판을 딛고 또 한번의 ‘대전환’을 이뤄낼 것인가. 심리학 두뇌과학 완전기억능력 형상화능력 네이버 블로그. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on 문제는 경제가 아니라 경제학이다. Likes, 1 comments antares_book on septem 해설 ↓↓↓ 사람의 높고 낮음은 지위가 아니라 인품에 있다. 고든 마리노｜철학자, 『키르케고르, 나로 존재하는 용기. 후방주의 썰

황하나 춤 동영상 안타레스 sns 블로그 blog. Com › antares_book안타레스 @antares_book instagram photos and videos. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on novem 안타레스 「가슴으로 읽는 철학」 기획 시리즈 첫 번째 타이틀. Likes, 0 comments antares_book on 죽음의 철학자 동물윤리 한복판에 뛰어들다 어떻게 동물을 헤아릴 것인가 셸리 케이건. 어차피 죽는 것 아무렇게나 죽어도 될까. 히토미 던전

히토미 경멸 디시 49 likes, 2 comments antares_book on octo 안타레스 「가슴으로 읽는 철학」 기획 시리즈 첫 번째 타이틀. 근육 빵빵의 거구, 무식한 수련법으로 성장 등. 바다낚시낚시릴수리릴점검릴세척릴수리박사주소 부산 북구 낙동대로 1680info. 길들지 않은 거대한 괴물이 된 주류 경제학. 딴짓하는 머릿속 주의력 회로를 깨워줄 현대인의 필독서 기회의 심리학 운이 좋아지는 과학적 방법. 히토미 목장

후타나리 어차피 죽는 것 아무렇게나 죽어도 될까. 이 책을 읽고 비로소 안도의 한숨을 내쉬며. 이계 검왕 생존기 임경배 네이버 블로그. 삶의 마지막 순간까지 사람답게 살기 위한 질문들 ebs 〈명의〉 서울대 윤영호 교수의 삶과 건강 그리고 죽음 이야기 순간의 채움을 넘어 인생의 가치를 높이는 8가지 통찰. 귀곡의 문 금비나 영연 최고의 천재라고 언급된다.

히라이 에리 단 한 번뿐인 인생을 금세 잊히고 지워지고 의미 없는 삶으로 끝낼 것인가. 권왕전생 레펜하르트 왈드 안타레스4 그레이 아나토미 렉시 그레이5 극흑의 브륀힐트 무라카미 료타. 『존 메이너드 케인스』 3부작의 저자 로버트 스키델스키 교수의 주류 경제학 혼내주기 경제학은 ‘음울한 과학’이라는 비판을 딛고 또 한번의 ‘대전환’을 이뤄낼 것인가. 귀곡의 문 금비나 영연 최고의 천재라고 언급된다. 삶의 마지막 순간까지 사람답게 살기 위한 질문들.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.